Firearms makers and gun-accessory manufacturers are certainly facing a hostile Senate and federal administration, but the battles aren’t all on the national stage. Several state governments are also making life difficult for firearms businesses, forcing gun and accessory makers in those states to consider moving their operations to friendlier locations. And some companies are beginning to push back, even if it costs them business. Examples:
In a nearby Shooter’s Log item, “What Would the World be Like Without Magpul and PMAG 30s?“, Dave Dolbee reports that “In their zeal to jump on the anti-gun agenda, lawmakers in Colorado have proposed banning the sale or manufacture of high-capacity magazines. The law would go well beyond Colorado’s borders by banning the manufacture of products to be sold out-of-state.”
In another Shooter’s Log item, “Gun Rights in Your State: The ILA and CRLDF,” CTD Scott points out, “State legislatures have more power than the federal government. Because of the smaller constituency and lobbying efforts, state governments can pass bills into laws with more ease than the U.S. Congress. So, you’re more likely to see restrictions on your gun rights come from your state than the federal government.”
Also in the Shooter’s Log, CTD Suzanne reports in the article, “Driving DPMS Out of Business: Minnesota House Bill 241,” Minnesota’s assault weapons ban would put DPMS out of business. On the company’s Facebook page, Adam Ballard, product manager at DPMS Panther Arms located in St. Cloud, said, “This bill would close our doors, put a great number of hard-working Americans out of work and infringe upon the rights of millions of lawful gun owners in Minnesota.”
However, some companies have begun pushing back against anti-gun state governments. In an item reported at GunAuction.com, competition-products retailer Creedmoor Sports has announced it will cease all operations at its Oceanside, California, location and relocate to the company’s newly acquired facilities in Anniston, Alabama. One cited reason: “Better business climate.”
Also in a report at GunAuction.com, Texas-based LaRue Tactical has changed its sales policy for state and local law-enforcement agencies. The company will only sell to local LE agencies what civilians in a given jurisdiction are allowed to own.
On the Olympic Arms Facebook page, Brian Schuetz, president of Olympic Arms, doubled down on LaRue’s policy and published this statement: “…Olympic Arms will no longer be doing business with the State of New York or any governmental entity or employee of such governmental entity within the State of New York — henceforth and until [the state’s gun-ban] legislation is repealed, and an apology made to the good people of the State of New York and the American people.” Find the full statement here.
Of course, Cheaper Than Dirt! reiterated our standing policy here.
York Arms has canceled “LE/Govt” orders in New York, as stated here.
Bob Reynolds, president of Templar Custom, Inc., has said, “We will not sell arms to agents of the state of New York that hold themselves to be ‘more equal’ than their citizens.” Read the full statement here.
EFI, LLC is a firearms manufacturer located in Inwood, West Virginia, that manufactures Heller Commemorative Rifles. Those rifles celebrate the 2008 decision by the United States Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller. The company’s government sales policy reads, in part: “The Federal Government and several states have enacted gun control laws that restrict the public from owning and possessing certain types of firearms. Law-enforcement agencies are typically exempt from these restrictions. EFI, LLC does not recognize law-enforcement exemptions to local, state, and federal gun control laws. If a product that we manufacture is not legal for a private citizen to own in a jurisdiction, we will not sell that product to a law-enforcement agency in that jurisdiction.”
We’re interested in your opinion:
If you live in one of the states that are further tightening gun laws (California and New York, to name two examples), will you still support the firearms-related companies that decamp for other states?
If you live in one of the states whose gun laws promote gun ownership, do you want companies such as Savage and Sturm Ruger (based in Connecticut) or Weatherby (based in California) to move your state?
Do you support LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms, and these other companies in their efforts to restrict LE sales in anti-gun states? Do you favor most companies’ response to match LE goods to local restrictions, or do you think Olympic’s ban on sales to New York State agencies and personnel is the right move? Will their efforts make any difference? Should other manufacturers follow suit?
Let us hear your thoughts in the comment section below.
The mission of Cheaper Than Dirt!’s blog, “The Shooter’s Log,” is to provide information—not opinions—to our customers and the shooting community. We want you, our readers, to be able to make informed decisions. The information provided here does not represent the views of Cheaper Than Dirt!
I deeply respect and salute these companies for taking the stand they have taken. I myself quit being a sporadic NRA member and signed up for its Lifetime membership. We all need to work together at whatever level to win this battle. I know I am making sure my children will share the essential values enshrined in our Constitution. A big thank you to these companies. Local law enforcement, and I hate to have to say this, will have to decide where to stand on this, either with the Constitution (the rule of law) or with the pandering politicians, and do their bit.
Comment by Marcus Fry — February 16, 2013 @ 12:03 am
This needs to be repeated by all gun, ammunition, “gear” etc manufacturers. You “guys” are our last defense against this tyranny.
Second Amendment is Under Full Attack: Time to Fight Fire With “Nukes” http://savingtherepublic.com/blog/2013/02/second-amendment-is-under-full-attack-time-to-fight-fire-with-nukes/
Comment by SavingtheRepublic.com — February 16, 2013 @ 12:26 am
As a New York State resident, I am sick and tired of being a second rate American Citizen! With the new, New York State recently passed gun laws, the line has been drawn in the sand, I have had enough!
I fully support “Cheaper Than Dirt” support, and ask Glock, S&W, Sig, Remington, Henry and any other gun company and suppliers of guns and ammunition to cease sales to ALL sales to NY State law enforcement agencies.
Thanks you, Cheaper Than Dirt, Charles French
Comment by Charles French — February 16, 2013 @ 12:47 am
I fully support the efforts of all those companies. I think it is a great idea that if a citizen can’t own something, the local/state/federal agencies shouldn’t have them either. If those companies move out of a state that doesn’t support their businesses and move to a state that does, I will buy from them.
Comment by CC — February 16, 2013 @ 12:50 am
You’ve got it. Fair is fair, if the government doesn’t want it’s law abiding citizens to have it, then they shouldn’t get it either. Considering that their actions directly impact the bottom line of the targeted vendors and manufacturers, I applaud their courage and committment to Americans rights. Thanks guys, we owe you.
Comment by Bill Johnson — February 16, 2013 @ 12:54 am
Yes, I support gun/accessory companies in their right and obligation to not sell to state agencies in a state that wants to strip away 2nd Amendment rights for its regular citizens. I used to live in Connecticut. They have a fine history of firearms manufacturing there. And look at what Massachusetts has become. A friend told me that he had to sign a form to buy ammunition. Years ago, when the NRA convention came to Seattle, I saw the Springfield booth. I asked the guy, “Why are you guys still in Massachusetts?” It was then one of the most anti-gun states in the union (now New York is). And to think, our revolution started in Massachusetts, and the Northeastern states led the fight. What a sad state (no pun intended) those NE states have become. Right now, we are in a cultural battle against the gun banners, who are clueless, idiots about guns. They want to ban guns; I want to ban idiots!
Comment by 2nd Fundamentalist — February 16, 2013 @ 12:56 am
I’m sure that firearms manufacturers will find a very good business atmosphere here in Texas.
Comment by Ken Savage — February 16, 2013 @ 12:57 am
I have already emailed my support of LaRue Tactical, Olympic arms, and York arms to say thank you for their stand. I have also emailed S&W, Glock, and Sig to ask that they join the movement. If we all don’t stand together now they will surely hang us separately. There are 800,000 law enforcement officers in state and federal but there are 80+ million law abiding civilians who purchase these arms– take a stand now or watch our rights be nibbled away. I refuse to patronize any company that doesn’t
respect me or my right but will gladly patronize those that do- hence my outstanding orders at LaRue and Olympic and will be glad to peruse the York catalog.
Comment by michael kerr — February 16, 2013 @ 12:58 am
Though in reality, these may be more symbolic in nature, I do support their statements and actions. If this useless ban on standard size AR magazines passes, I won’t buy anymore Magpul products if they DO stay in CO. Yes, while plants can’t be shipped out overnight, I’d be da*ned if my business would stay in a non-permissive environment.
Sometimes, laws like these indicate other red flags for businesses like higher taxes,increased regulations and businesses are just looked at as cash cows.
If you don’t live in CO, let people know why you’re not going to visit, I know good people will be hurt but it’s the only way to get your point across. CO legislators aren’t going to listen to us.
If you’re a CO resident and these unconstitutional bills pass, start targeting these traitorous legislators for defeat, some sneaked in by the skin of their teeth. And for God’s sake, get rid of Gov. Chickencooper in 2014.
Take back Colorado.
Comment by mr. parker — February 16, 2013 @ 12:58 am
You are damn right I will back up the companies that back up the 2nd amendment. The first thing I did was calculate how much I spent at my local Wal Mart, when they were unsure of where to stand, and I told them I and maybe up to 4-5 million others would pull out of Wal Mart in total if they caved in to the political knee jerk reactions that were stripping us of our 2nd Amendment rights. I am sorry about every incident that cost civilian lives but with an enforcement level of .00055%, as explained by US Senator Lindsey Graham (SC) how in the world did it make sense to put more laws on the books when we are not using the ones we have. That is just a start, this is a political move made on the dead children on Newtown, Conn. which makes it even more disgusting. Fast & Furious, Benghazi, Operation Wide Receiver,…when are we going to hold Obama accountable? What else do we not know about? I expect a drone to be overhead any moment so let me sign off before I vanish from a Maverick. Liberty to all. Stand and be heard or shut up and be buried, history proves it repeatedly.
Comment by Richard White — February 16, 2013 @ 12:59 am
I as a resident of Georgia would love to see those companies relocate to our state, and will do anything in my power to support their decisions to restrict sales to LE and government agencies to reflect the firearms laws of their state. They should live by the same laws they dictate to their citizens as they are not above the law. I am a proud owner of 2 DPMS firearms and feel that what Minnesota is doing is unjust and unfair. They should not dictate what they manufacture for legal purchase in other localities it’s one thing to ban it in your own state but to control what it sells elswhere is crossing a line.
Comment by Jeff Adams — February 16, 2013 @ 1:03 am
I applaud these companies, come to NW Florida we love our guns, and we appreciate our companies and the Jobs they bring. We also do not have a state income tax. And you don’t have to worry about counties or cities making laws that restrict weapons, only the state can pass gun laws in this state.
Comment by Larry — February 16, 2013 @ 1:07 am
Great job Cheaper Than Dirt, Olympic Arms, LaRue Tactical and any other firm with the guts to stand up to these repressive state governments! This policy is nothing short of brilliant and I applaud you for making such a bold statement. I am going to personally commit to supporting any company which stands by the Second Ammendment and the American People by looking at them first for all future purchases. Thank you!!!
Comment by Scott Sloan — February 16, 2013 @ 1:08 am
I absolutely love this attitude, would welcome any gun industry company in my great State of Nevada, and hope to see total solidarity from ALL gun industry participants in this stance.
Comment by Chris Bolton — February 16, 2013 @ 1:09 am
I live in Maine and I believe we would love to have any and all of these companies move here. We are one of the highest taxed states with one of the lowest incomes. Having any or all of these companies here would be great for everyone on both sides. Thank you CTD and all the other companies for standing up for the people who strongly believe in our second Amendment. I will pass this on to all my friends, who also shop at CTD.
Comment by Bill Bradbury — February 16, 2013 @ 1:10 am
I totally support everything Cheaper Than Dirt is doing and all the companies that are standing behind our second amendment right..I personally will support all companies that are willing to go the extra mile for a pro-gun person such as myself..I will now look to these companies to buy from in the future and encourage all my fellow NRA friends to do the same..I truly hope all gun companies will follow suit. I would say without doubt, that my state (Texas) would gladly welcome with open arms, any and all gun companies to come to our wonderful state and open your businesses!!! I thank each and every one of you for supporting our rights as gun owners..God Bless Mel
Comment by Mel Whitworth — February 16, 2013 @ 1:11 am
God Bless LaRue, Olympic, CTD and all those companies that are fighting back. Those of us that are not sheeple, will support your companies and I am sure that the governments of KS, OK and TX along with WY, and MT would be glad to have you set up shop in their States. Those that support gun grabbing seem to forget that this is a Republic and not an Autocracy. First the 2nd amendment, then the 22nd? The time to stand against them is now folks!
Comment by Joe Pawlak — February 16, 2013 @ 1:11 am
I applaud the efforts of CTD, LaRue Tactical, and other companies who have stood up for the American Citizens. I have been a customer of CTD for many years and am glad to see that they are taking a patriotic position on this matter. The other manufacturers that were mentioned also have my profound thanks and respect for taking a stand; standing with Us, the U.S. Citizens against this tyrannical regime and their unconstitutional tactics. I will support these brave CEO’s and their companies to the best of my ability. Thank You, Mark Sartor.
Comment by Mark Sartor — February 16, 2013 @ 1:16 am
This is a great idea. I know it is not possible, but what if the gun industry just sold to civilians and to the Feds if Washington enforces the 2nd amendment.
Comment by Mike Hansen — February 16, 2013 @ 1:16 am
Olympic Arms President, Brian Schuetz said it best: We must stand together, or we shall surely fall divided.
A great American. Thank You!!
Comment by chuck — February 16, 2013 @ 1:18 am
Not only do I support these actions but I hope this wave of action grows… We need to see the big companies like Colt, Smith and Wesson, Remington, Ruger, etc… Do the exact same thing.
The LEO market is FAR smaller than the non-LEO market is, these companies need to step up and make sure that their largest customer base is the customer base they are willing to stand by.
Comment by Chris — February 16, 2013 @ 1:20 am
It is about time that manufacturers who will be run out of business recognize that the word civilian includes civilian authorities. If Obama and Feinstein and Biden demand that an entire industry and millions of jobs be immediately removed from this nation, then let the entire nation suffer together.
Comment by Herbert S. Searched — February 16, 2013 @ 1:21 am
I totally agree that any state or federal agency that does not allow its citizens to be equally armed does not deserve to be able to buy arms and accessories that the common man can’t own.
This is America and we are equal to protect ourselves against a tyrannical government.
Molon Labe
Comment by Larry Zeolia — February 16, 2013 @ 1:23 am
I support 100% any and all efforts to push back against any governmental agency which promots this attack on our 2nd amendment rights. All gun manufacturers ans related manufacturers should immediately relocate out of these “gun control” states to states which are enlightened. When the economy’s of these “gun control” states feel some impact their political leaders may get the message.
Comment by Pat Noto — February 16, 2013 @ 1:26 am
I will gladly support any company that moves. What I won’t support is cheaper than dirt anymore.You are price gouging om magazines, and I will not do business with you anymore.You are exploiting a tragedy just as much as obama and the dems. If you are cheaper than dirt, your dirt must be made of gold!
Comment by mike oates — February 16, 2013 @ 1:29 am
I completely support any company that willingly supports the 2nd Amendment. If a company that does business in a restrictive area decides to move I fully support that as well. The states have to realize that they are not only cutting their own throats for limiting the legal citizens to defend themselves, but also they are killing their tax base, not only by the lose of sales tax but also by the employees of those companies being put out of work, unless the employees are able to move with the companies.
What I would also like to see is the ammo companies refusing to sell to the U.S. Government and sell all ammo to the citizens so that we may protect ourselves from this would be dictator.
Comment by Timothy A. Riley — February 16, 2013 @ 1:29 am
These companies are leading the way and more need to follow. If a large company like Ruger, S&W or another join up with the ban that will be when people start to take notice.
Comment by Dane — February 16, 2013 @ 1:30 am
As a California resident, I am grateful to companies like La Rue, Barrett firearms (not mentioned) and others who are refusing to sell to this oppressive state that has limited the firearms I can own, yet allows LE and others to own without restriction. The mentality of California and New York is exactly the opposite of what the founding fathers intended with the 2nd amendment.
Comment by Don Glan — February 16, 2013 @ 1:32 am
I think it’s great that these firearms manufacturers/accessory manufacturers are willing to stand up against state and federal gov’t. along with the people.I commend them on putting civilian buyers before dollars and not selling to LE agencies in states that do not recognize civilians 2nd amendment rights to own certain firearms/accessories.I believe this will send a message to lawmakers/gov’t. that they are not above the laws they make and should not be allowed to purchase items the general public cannot as well as letting them know that their laws are ridiculous&unconstitutional.I only wish more firearms companies would join in!
Comment by Chris Hayens — February 16, 2013 @ 1:34 am
I applaud and support any firearms company that is willing to take these strong measures against tyrannical state and local municipalities, let alone our federal government! The hypocrisy of Obama talking about putting people to work, while pushing a gun control agenda that would put tens of thousands out of work and out of business is lunacy. If I owned a firearms related company and could afford to do so I would move it to a state that would welcome my company, my tax dollars, and the contributions I bring to the local economy! Of course the problem is addressing the issue of the LOYAL employee’s whose skills and dedication have helped make a company that are left behind. Damn this administration for it’s short sightedness and hypocrisy!
Comment by John Franco — February 16, 2013 @ 1:41 am
I will always support any company that fights for our constitution. It is nice to see commerce taking the risk as we do when we support them. If the politicians have their way they would just take our guns away and give nothing in return. The Supreme Court got it right when they said there is no way the police can protect the public and it is not their responsibility to do so. As long as that is true (and it will be forever) it will always be my responsibility. I accept that and no government agency has the right to stop me or negate our constitution.
Comment by Chris — February 16, 2013 @ 1:43 am
States like Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas and others have a very pro second amendment
rights position and would welcome any firearm or firearm related businesses to relocate there operations in these states. We would think Remington (The Freedom Group), as an example, should consider moving ALL there plant operations to a more firearm friendly state.
Comment by Terry M. Owen — February 16, 2013 @ 1:44 am
I support any company that takes such a stand against doing business with a state that puts it’s LE/Govt rights and accesses to gun culture products above the rights of it’s citizen’s. This is truly putting your money where your mouth is, and I applaud those companies for their willingness to take a financial hit to make clear how they feel about the direction things are going these days. I think we could all take a closer look at things we spend our money on and where they are coming from. Vote against those people and places who want to manipulate your Second Amendment rights using your voice, your feet, and your wallet.
Comment by RJS — February 16, 2013 @ 1:46 am
Yes!!! I support LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms, and these other companies in their efforts to restrict LE sales in anti-gun states.I also favor most companies’ response to match LE goods to local restrictions.I do believe Olympic’s ban on sales to New York State agencies and personnel is the right move and their efforts will make a difference.Other manufacturers follow suit and move here to south Mississippi.
Comment by Reggie — February 16, 2013 @ 1:47 am
I agree, if it not allowed for the citizenry to possess a type of weapon, then LE should be forced to abide by that very same law.
Comment by Elon Mix — February 16, 2013 @ 1:50 am
I live in North Mississippi, and I think I speak for all of north Mississippi in saying we support any company who values the rights of citizens.We also love our guns here. If any of these companies would like to move to north Mississippi we would welcome them with open arms. It would also be easy to obtain land and a skilled workforce as there are many development programs already in action here.
Comment by Keb Wallis — February 16, 2013 @ 1:54 am
I’m a California resident, and I wholeheartedly support the efforts of manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers to fight back against “more equal than you” laws. I’m a small-business mentor, and let me tell you–these companies are putting their bottom lines at risks for civilians by refusing government orders. We owe them. Let’s support them.
Comment by Hilary — February 16, 2013 @ 1:57 am
I think that it is only right that law enforcement and citizens have the same and equal rights to firearms of all types. Unfortunitly it was only a few hundred years ago that the citizens of the US had to free the country of tyrany and it is not inconceiveable that we may have to stand up for our freedon again aginst a government that trys to take away our rights and freedom AND the right to bare arms. I am not a violent person but history has proven that what goes up always comes down (Governments and Nations) and we have to be brepared for what may happen. At the present time I think most people are to far extreme in their feelings, because of fear, and I hope things come back to neutral and reasonable. I am in total agreement that the arms companies should stand up for equal rights for the average person and not sell weapons to government agencies that they cannot sell to us.
Comment by Barry Martin — February 16, 2013 @ 2:04 am
I think it is a very bold stance and I applaud those who will risk potential business for the greater good. As of reading this post, I plan to change my purchasing habits as well as talk to my local shops about this move and make sure they are aware that I will only purchase from those who support only selling to LE that allow citizens to own the same.
I would, as would my state, welcome any gun or gun related item maker and also applaud them for taking the risk and financial hit to move.
Thank You for this post!
Comment by Justin S — February 16, 2013 @ 2:08 am
This is the best idea i have heard of. I think if all manufactures would do this, these states would re think their positions. As for myself i live in Washington and am seriously looking at other states to move to if Washington passes any of the restrictions that are rumored. I really think the manufactures have a lot of power if they will stick together. We need to support them.
Comment by John Niederer — February 16, 2013 @ 2:14 am
I think that states that constrict on the fire arm rights of its residents LE shouldnt be any different. They are no more than citizens with a badge.
Comment by Jason Harvey — February 16, 2013 @ 2:18 am
Companies that stand up for my rights will win my business even if it means I might pay a bit more.
Comment by Russ Kaufmann — February 16, 2013 @ 2:18 am
great job you gun companies are doing I respect and will pass the word along to as many as I can. keep up the great work and the rest of the people will stand by you as you khow I will
Comment by Randall Cote — February 16, 2013 @ 2:36 am
Fortunately for me, I live in a state that recognizes and supports the 2nd Amendment. I lived in New Jersey until the age of 50 and went through the whole “Assault Weapon Ban” from 1994 to 2004 while living there. At the time, I owned a Colt Delta Heavy Barrel AR-15 that my wife had bought for me as a Christmas gift. In order to keep it I had to join a rifle club that was affiliated with the DCM to show that I used the rifle in competition. The annual cost for that was almost $200.00. I then had to “Register” the rifle with the state police (even though I filled out a Form 4473 when I bought it) as an “Assault Weapon”. Because it was an “Assault Weapon”, I had to be finger printed and also pay a $50.00 fee to the State Police. Looking back, that seems rather mild compared to what’s on the horizon. This current gun grab is nothing but another attempt to infringe on our GOD given rights, that being to protect ones self and family (and against a tyrannical government). I applaud all the gun manufacturers and sellers thereof as well as companies who deal in accessories for those guns for standing up and taking what is sure to be a financial hit. What a concept, morals over profits. You’ll never see that on Wall Street. GOD BLESS THEM!! If all companies in the firearms industry would follow suit, can you imagine what the fallout would be? We’d have the pinko’s in retreat? And then maybe, just maybe, the citizenry would stand up themselves and say “Enough is Enough”. That may be wishful thinking because this country of 200 some odd years ago is not the country of today. Back then the patriots had a voice and acted when needed. There are actually some schools today that are treating the Boston Tea Party as a “Terrorist Act”. Can you imagine? Schools are telling students that you can’t wear the American Flag because it might offend some students. But, I digress. This whole feel good gun legislation so we can save the children, if only one child, is common sense, is NONsense. It’s about confiscating your guns and your ability to stave off the oncoming Marxist/Socialist Government. The Elephant is in the room people. GOD help us all!
Comment by George Reilly — February 16, 2013 @ 2:36 am
I think it is a great thing pushing back against anti-gun state governments. Another way to bring attention is for gun owners to stage a mass boycott of NY state lottery. By boycotting Lottery sales lots of other business and especially the state would suffer millions of dollars in revenue loss. Small businesses such as bars and mom and pop stores would soon be crying from the loss.Lottery players can buy online from states that support 2nd amendment.
Comment by J brunet — February 16, 2013 @ 2:36 am
We must come together as members of the shooting sports and believers in the Constitution of the United States and take a stand. Each of us needs to understand that there are some who will never be swayed from their belief that gun control is the answer…do not fight the battle with them. Get out there and share your love of the sport with those who may sit on the fence. Be the very best spokes person for your discipline and show others that the firearm is not to be feared and that the people who do evil are the danger. Set the next generation up for success by taking the time to teach, coach and mentor those who will stand with us, not against us. Get your shooting buddies to MAKE time to write their representatives. We must pull out all the stops and forge forward with a winning attitude that counters anything the anti-gun lobby throws our way in a succinct, intelligent and confident manner. This is the good fight!
Comment by SWAN — February 16, 2013 @ 2:38 am
Thank you for your continued support of the 2nd Amendment. I support you and your efforts in combating our ridiculous legislative bodies both federal and state that pass laws that are not only impossible to enforce but that serve no practical purpose nor will cause no change in violence rates. Crazies are going to do what they do and copy-cats will also. The main stream media certainly is no help for either 2nd Amendment rights nor law abiding gun owners. No group should be exempt from the laws these legislators pass, in fact, if a legislator came to a gun shop to buy a weapon or a magazine or ammunition, I think they should be turned away also.
Comment by Rodney Roberts — February 16, 2013 @ 2:45 am
I agree very much with the decisions of these companies, and support them whole heartedly.
Comment by Jim Bullock — February 16, 2013 @ 2:50 am
Hi,
I received your email about “Cheaper Than Dirt Supports Citizens’ 2nd Amendment Rights” and I also read it on your facebook page. I don’t have an account with Facebook so I can’t comment there. I just wanted to say “THANK YOU” for standing with the 2nd Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms. I am proud of the companies taking this stand and I hope that all companies that deals with anything pertaining with Firearms does the same. I am proud to do bussiness with you and any company that does the same.
Again “THANK YOU Cheaper” Than Dirt!!!
Comment by Monte L. Miller — February 16, 2013 @ 2:51 am
This article makes me very happy! Finaly other companies and orginazations other than the NRA are taking a stand against anti gun laws.
Comment by Ryan — February 16, 2013 @ 2:51 am
This is great!
Comment by Mike — February 16, 2013 @ 2:55 am
I do support companys such as LaRue FULLY!!! I belive if us as private citizens are not allowed to owen or buy the type of guns spoke of in current legislation neiher should L.
E. Due to the fact that obama and his cronnies belive that limiting our access to thies type of firearms will solve an eliminate all gun violence murder and assaults inturn NO LONGER necessary for L.E. to have thies weapons either…
Comment by justin smothers — February 16, 2013 @ 2:59 am
I applaud the stand that LaRue, Olympic, & CTD have instigated towards anti-gun states. I urge all firearms companies, accessories companies, ammo companies etc. to follow suite. Now more than any time in the modern history of our country we must stand united. Our government federal & state only support their personal political interests. Ever notice when president Obama talks about gun violence he never ever mentions the violent movies and video games Hollywood has been turning out over the years and each action movie seems to be more violent than the previous hit movie? It’s because he knows his campaign fund raising and celebrity endorsements would dry up. I believe Obama’s real agenda is to disarm American citizens. To all us consumers please support the companies that are taking a financial hit for us.
I know times are tough for most Americans. WE MUST UNITE FOR THIS CAUSE !!!
Comment by Jim — February 16, 2013 @ 3:02 am
Oh please, please, please, please move your gun factories to Southern Oregon ( Medford)where you would be appreciated more than you could imagine, Magpul you get the Red carpet treatment Road House Grill on me…
Henry weeks
Comment by henry weeks — February 16, 2013 @ 3:12 am
I fully concur with the position being taken by companies to sell only products allowed by citizens to be sold to government agents. There is constitional support for said position; simply stated – it is a government by the people; not the ‘elite’. All firearms companies are welcome in Virginia; unless our state leaders go rougue.
Comment by Mike Goldman — February 16, 2013 @ 3:17 am
I support the companies who refuse government and LE sales if civilians aren’t allowed to buy the same items. Other companies should do the same. Manufacturers would be welcome in my Southern state, just in case the secessionists gain enough support. The previous conflict was lost due in part to lack of local gun makers.
If enough companies are willing to forego revenue to make a point, maybe some of these misguided politicians will realize that increased contributions for their opponents will also result.
Comment by Jim Bob — February 16, 2013 @ 3:24 am
It would be nice if there was a list of businesses that are taking action to refuse sales to anti 2nd amendment governments and that are moving their operations to friendly states. I would certainly prefer to spend my money with them.
Comment by Deems — February 16, 2013 @ 3:25 am
I fully support these companies in their decisions to curtail or cancel orders from LE agencies in states that disregard the second amendment.
Comment by MMSDave — February 16, 2013 @ 3:29 am
While supporting the intentions behind these actions, I remain baffled why the vast majority of politicians seem to gloss over the fact that the ‘trained’ LE individuals are especially trustworthy beyond the public in regards to handling and buying advanced firearms. They are recruited from the public and return to the public at large when they inevitably retire, incorporating them at both ends of the trained vs untrained spectrum of the process. Obviously they are, as individuals, expected to be responsible firearm maintainers on and after duty, yet they ARE real human beings, with real life stress, drama and issues of their own, not gods embodied in a uniform.
Limiting what a non-uniformed individual is ‘trustworthy’ to own over what someone being issued is ‘mandated to carry’ is an underhanded way of stating that “If we didn’t provide it, you shouldn’t have it or are incompetent to own it.
The short term losses in the sales while moving to a firearm friendly jurisdiction will likely pay large dividends both in continued appreciation for quality firearms by purchase and also by ensuring that short-sighted legal bullying by a few groups do not deprive the rest of us from a reasonable product to use in a safe and legal manner.
Comment by CDW — February 16, 2013 @ 3:30 am
Good job i’m all in. Police should not be exempt, whats good for the goose is good for the gander. Maybe if they can’t get Ammo they can start throwing rocks, back to the stoneage
Comment by Ryan — February 16, 2013 @ 3:32 am
I absolutely support the decisions of these companies. I also think toilet paper companies should do the same thing, refuse to sell to those governments that enact stupid gun laws.
Comment by Vernon Brown — February 16, 2013 @ 3:42 am
I do agree! I welcome you one and all, come to Indiana. We have plenty of hard working Americans willing to work side by side in a comfortable business environment.
Comment by David — February 16, 2013 @ 3:46 am
I never understood why Firearm Companies continued to run their business in Anti-Gun States. Usually the Anti-Gun States are Anti-Business too. I support all of these Companies moving to Pro-Gun States. Magpul, please move up here to NW Montana, we have more space than you could ever need, it is becoming a Firearms Industry hub and we have the labor force.
Comment by D.A. Hancock — February 16, 2013 @ 4:03 am
Yes, I definitely support those companies that relocate from a State that restricts the sale of items produced in that state from its own citizens. Those states are receiving tax revenue from the sale of those products and from the Companies operating in their state. They are also receiving revenue from the employees that work for those companies. There are other states that will gladly welcome those companies for the jobs that they will provide and for the revenue they will generate.
Manufacturing companies should place sanctions on State agencies that impose unjust gun laws and restrictions on their citizens.
Remember; “WE THE PEOPLE” and “FOR THE PEOPLE AND BY THE PEOPLE”
Comment by Leslie Winslow — February 16, 2013 @ 4:05 am
I absolutely support the companies that choose to move. Come to Texas! I also agree with companies that choose to limit sales in any area that restricts citizen gun ownership. The 2nd amendment is not about hunting or target shooting. It is about the citizens’ right to protect themselves against a repressive government.
Comment by David — February 16, 2013 @ 4:08 am
As an aspiring gunsmith who is months away from completing my degree and applying for my FFL, I was scared that any gun ban or restrictions would hurt the industry that I am wanting to open my business in. I am very relieved and in full support of any and all companies who have done what these companies have done. I first read the deal with LaRue Tactical about 2 weeks ago on Facebook, and I felt like a kid on Christmas Day. To me it was a sign of reassurance and hope; not only for the firearms industry, but for 2nd Amendment rights. One thing that really ticked me off was that BHO claims he is a supporter of American Jobs, but how can this be if what Obama and the Democrats are purposing, would end thousands of American jobs in the largest and oldest USA industry!
I am a Connecticut resident and would like our local manufaturers to stay here (I have 5 friends who are employed by Mossberg and 2 employed by Savage, but I will continue to support any of them if they relocate to stay in business, even at the cost of local jobs. As long as they do NOT relocate to China, I will support them 100%!
Comment by Dave — February 16, 2013 @ 4:15 am
I think this is a great policy. It defeats the purpose of the Second Amendment if the government will only allow the people to be “armed” with bows and arrows. A disarmed people will be dissatisfied with their government if they are not allowed to deport themselves as do the civil police forces, charged with “their” protection. If you first disarm the police, you may then consider disarming the people. It is the police who are responsible for the spike in large capacity magazines. If they need them, we need them. If they dont need guns, we dont need guns.
The reasoning is strikingly clear. The cops are the experts on the current
criminal trends. If they have determined that a “high capacity” semiautomatic
pistol and a .223 semiautomatic rifle with 30-round magazines are the best
firearms for them to use to protect people like me and my family, they are
obviously the best things for us to use to protect ourselves and our families .
You cannot deprive us of that. We do not work for you, you work for us.
Comment by Linda — February 16, 2013 @ 4:20 am
just want say: “Hoorah!!!”
Excellent! please do more!! If a company is in a state like CT, NY, NJ, CAL, COL….
all that seem to hate guns SO MUCH! …Hit those states were it hurts most!! …
TAX REVENUE!!! TAX REVENUE and JOB! AND SUPPORTIVE IND.’s JOBS! “HIT THEM IN THE POCKETBOOK” – IN THEIR BOTTOM LINE! HAVE A RALLY TO SUPPORT THESE BRAVE AND COURAGIOUS PATRIOT COMPANY! HAVE OPEN STATE AUCTIONS TO INCENTIVES AND SUCH!!!
if gun co. would just up and move or threaten to do so… you’d see those states change their tunes pretty quite – THAT’S for sure!!!
GOD BLESS THE GUN COMPANIES AND GOD BLESS THE (STILL FREE, JUST BEARLY) USA!!!
Comment by dave cobden — February 16, 2013 @ 4:26 am
I think this is great. I was going to buy a scope for my AR from some optics website, but after finding out about this Gov’t ban, I purchased the same scope from CTD. My way of supporting companies that support me.
All of these companies doing this have earned my respect and business.
Comment by James — February 16, 2013 @ 4:29 am
I urge any companies involved to relocate to Florida. You are welcome here, and we can use the jobs. Florida has been in the forefront of CCW and we like our self defense laws. We would welcome DPMS, Magpul, and all others who seek a gun-friendly environment.
Comment by jetdrvr — February 16, 2013 @ 4:29 am
This is an outstanding tred. The question of civilian owenrship of military grade firearms for the common defense of the people , satates, and constitution of the united states has been settled law since the 2nd amendment was ratified. The rights reserved to the people by it are not open for debate by any legislature, or congress save another prohibition style constitutional amendment. What these bodies are proposing (or passing in the cases of CA and NY)is at its’ core, rebellion against our people and their defined rule of law. We need to be voting out rebels from our elected offices and voting in people who respect our country and work withing its’ system of law to change what they don’t like. It is every americans’ duty to resist rebellion against our country to the best of their ability. I am proud to see companies doing this, especially DPMS which is located in my hometown of St. Cloud MN. Rock on gentlemen.
Comment by Dave — February 16, 2013 @ 4:32 am
I wholeheartedly agree with the above corporate statements. No entity should be above the law.
Comment by Ron Moore — February 16, 2013 @ 4:35 am
I fully support each of the firearms manufacturing companies’ thoughtful actions to cease sales to LE & other government agencies that hold themselves “more equal” than the citizens who THEY serve. I encourage weapons-friendly states’ governors to reach out to firearms manufacturers currently located & operating in firearms-unfriendly states, to relocate their facilities, employees and hence the tax base.
I had already determined that I will never agan vacation in New York, Colorado or California and spend any money in states hostile to our Second Amendment rights.
Comment by Dave — February 16, 2013 @ 4:38 am
I believe that the gun and gun related companies are doing the right thing by holding states and gevernmental agencies to the same standards as “we the people”. Would like more of those company’s to consider moving their businesses to the pro gun state of Kentucky,whoa! Donald R. Hohman CWO USA (Ret) POW
Comment by hohmandr — February 16, 2013 @ 4:42 am
I know of many “Firearm Friendly” Southern states that would be more than happy to have these companies relocate to the SE region. A strong majority of Southerners believe in upholding the US Constitution and would love to have the chance to work for these companies.
Comment by Eric Herring — February 16, 2013 @ 4:46 am
I applaud the brave decisions of the firearms and accessories manufactures to fight back in any productive way to protect their and our 2nd amendment rights. I reside in Massachusetts and live under restrictive arms controls already. I never believed in owning firearms but changed my mind in 2009 when it became apparent that a culture war was comming. As Mark Levin said the other night; ‘We must fight with every legal means necessary to slow the Progressives and Marxists down’ (paraphrased). Like our forefathers before us we must be ready to die to defend freedom. I am a son of the ‘Greatest Generation’ that ever was. It’s now my turn, at the tender age of 65, to step into the ranks and yet again defend freedom in this land and fight those, in our own tyrannical government, who oppose liberty. God bless is all!
Comment by Dennis Lindsay — February 16, 2013 @ 4:49 am
You have made my day! I think you are on the right track to do this government ban. I hope and pray all the companies will do this-especially Colt and S&W. They sell so much to local gov’s and the Fed. Besides voting against the bums that support gun bans, what can we as individuals do?
Comment by Braxton Lee — February 16, 2013 @ 4:54 am
Do you support LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms, and these other companies in their efforts to restrict LE sales in anti-gun states? Absolutely, and I should think that it would apply to all support and sales of parts and accessories.
Do you favor most companies’ response to match LE goods to local restrictions. Yes!
Do you think Olympic’s ban on sales to New York State agencies and personnel is the right move? Yes, even better than matching local restrictions! Law enforecement agency leadership may rethink their support of gun bans once it is applied to them.
Will their efforts make any difference? Yes. Should other manufacturers follow suit? Absolutely, a unified response to this is necessary.
It may have unintended consequences, like an attempt by gun control advocates to nationalize one or more manufacturers, however whatever follows will require more discussion and may bring the discussion around to the issues with which we should be concerned; mental illness and enforcement of laws already on the books which effectively keep guns out of the hands of criminals and mentally unstable individuals.
website = email
Comment by Michael Tillery — February 16, 2013 @ 4:55 am
10 years ago the state government of Vermont tried to set prices it paid for prescription drugs. American pharmaceutical companies would have had to sell their products at a loss in Vermont . By refusing to do business in Vermont, These drug companies forced Vermont to return to free market practices and allow the competitive market to set drug prices. Hooray for fire arms companies for using these tactics against these anti-2nd ammendment state governments! It will work!
Comment by Richard F. — February 16, 2013 @ 4:58 am
I live in south Florida, and I am following this Gun issue very closely. I support Gun Rights, our 2nd Amendment rights, our Constitution. I support every one of these companies as they move to stop selling to state and LE agencies in those states who are writing legislation to infringe on the rights of a free America and our Constitutional rights. The time HAS come for Americans to stand up to tyrannical Governments hell bent of stripping Americans of their Constitutional Right to Bear Arms. WE the People, those who are the majority of Law Abiding Citizens in this great country that own Firearms and who are NOT the few perpetrating violent heinous crimes on society shall not be forced to live under such Govt oppression due to the actions of a few. It Is the law abiding citizen who is licensed to Carry, and own firearms in our homes that Can and all too often DO stop violent offenders who acquire their guns illegally and from the Black market. Lets all stand up now and fight our irresponsible law makers as they try to strip us of our 2nd Amendment rights in their efforts to disarm a Law Abiding Majority of Americans because of the few criminals and mentally disturbed. I support each and every GUN and Firearm accessory manufacturer who stands up to the reckless irresponsible law makers!
Comment by James — February 16, 2013 @ 5:11 am
you bet LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms as well any gun manufacture or arms dealer that stop selling to theses states or govement is doing right. the constution was desigend for the protection of the american people. If we lose our right to bear arms it won’t be long before we will have another Hitler running this country. Then it will turn into another Bosina with ethnic cleansing. like Thomas Jefferson said turn your guns into plow shears you will be plowing for those who don’t thank you for letting me say what I feel keep up the good work George
Comment by george — February 16, 2013 @ 5:14 am
Move your businesses to Pennsylvania. At least we have a State Constitution that supports gun rights.
Article 1 Section 21 reads:
The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.
Doesn’t need to be interpreted by anyone.
Comment by Clete — February 16, 2013 @ 5:16 am
I live in New York State and think all gun, ammo and parts manufacturers should follow the lead of LaRue and Olympic, also I believe they should suspend sales to federal agencies that are accumulating excess ammo and weapons which only seems to be to prevent
citizens from getting resupplied.
Comment by Red Mack — February 16, 2013 @ 5:20 am
I know that companies who refuse to sell to local and federal governments that ban sales to private citizens will suffer reduced profit. But, with an issue this important, everyone should support them in their effort. I hope that all weapon and ammunition manufacturers follow the actions of Creedmoor Sports, LaRue Tactical and others. My hat is off to them. Keep up the good work
Comment by Rhea Harris — February 16, 2013 @ 5:27 am
I would like to offer my insight on SB 281 heard by Senator Frosh on Wednesday 2/6/13 in Maryland.
I did not hear one person mention anything about Saxton Outdoor Supply gun shop that was robbed, in PA and the Baltimore Police chased and caught the robbers with over 29 stolen hand guns. The guns were going on the streets of Baltimore!
Source: http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/content.detail/id/568296/Two-alleged-thieves-hospitalized-after-chase.html?nav=756
Mr. Frosh was very disrespectful to Jake McGuigan of the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) based in Newtown when Mr. McGuigan spoke about the (Liberal Medias Name) “Assault Weapons” Ban. Mr. McGuigan stated that the FBI Homicide Statistics that 2 of the 400 homicides were committed with a rifle at he and Mr. O’Malley want to ban. TWO Rifles. There has to be more to Mr. Frosh and Mr. O’Malley gun grab if only 2 rifles were used in homicides.
Mr. Frosh stated “You’re coming from Newtown, Connecticut, to tell us an assault-weapons ban would not save lives?” asked Sen. Brian E. Frosh (D-Montgomery).
Mr. Frosh and Mr. O’Malley have not made the public aware that only 4 hand guns were used in the attack and found at the school in Connecticut according to NBC News. Mr. Lanza tried to purchase a gun in Daubery, Connecticut on December 11, 2012 (Tuesday) which has very strict gun control laws and was denied the purchase a rifle in Connecticut. Your so called “Assault Rifle” was found in the trunk of the vehicle. On the 13 of December 2012 Mr. Lanza went to the school and had an altercation with four (4) staff members according to NBC NEWS. Why has the media not covered this? Because this will not help their gun-control movement or agenda. Did you know that?
Source: http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495
What Mr. Frosh and Mr. O’Malley have not told the public ( are withholding important information that will not support their gun ban) is that while participating in what was billed by the White House as a “Fireside Hangout” on the website Google+, Biden acknowledged that “assault weapons” (modern sporting firearms) account for a small fraction of gun deaths in America.
Source: Source: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/01/24/biden-gun-safety-google/1862309/
What Mr. Frosh and Mr. O’Malley have not told the public is that Mark Mattioli, whose son, James, 6, was killed at Sandy Hook asked the committee: what have those gun laws done to make Chicago a safer city?” (Refering to Chicago’s strict gun control laws) Mattioli went on to condemn liberals for using the attack on Newtown to “spread fear on gun issues”. 1/28/13
Source: http://www.theoutdoorwire.com/
Bill Stevens, whose daughter attended Sandy Hook Elementary school, scene of the mass shooting in December, Although his daughter was not harmed in the shooting, his daughter’s friend’s little sister was a victim.
In his testimony, he was very clear on his stance against going after legal gun owners and that no one will take his freedom away to protect his daughter. A video of a father, Bill Stevens, whose daughter attended Sandy Hook Elementary school, scene of the mass shooting in December, is making its rounds today of his testimony against gun control at a Working Group Public Hearing at the Connecticut State Capitol on gun violence prevention.
Although his daughter was not harmed in the shooting, his daughter’s friend’s little sister was a victim.
In his testimony, he was very clear on his stance against going after legal gun owners and that no one will take his freedom away to protect his daughter.
Stevens told the panel that he is not there to cite statistics, lives saved by a gun or the economic impact. He was there to remind those people about the U.S. Constitution and the 2nd Amendment,
Source: http://www.examiner.com/article/newtown-father-you-ll-have-to-take-my-guns-from-my-cold-dead-hands
You, Mr. Frosh or Mr. O’Malley make no mention of holding the Media or the Violent Video Games Industry accountable for their part in the decline of Americas Values or Lives. The President of the United States who received financial support in his re-election campaign from the Hollywood Elite and has made no mention of media. Is this right?
Why did Mr. O’Malley not include anything in SB 281 about the violent video games or violent movies but tied school security money in the bill to win the bills approval so there is money to take home for each school district. If school security is major concern, a bill should have been submitted for just school security and not tied to another bill to wins is passage.
If the President, Mr. Frosh and Mr. O’Malley cares so much about this he would DO EVERYTHING possible and they have not. Mr. O’Malley is making sure that he does not hold the Hollywood Elite responsible or the Violent Video Game Industry so that he has a revenue source for his run for president. Shame on you Mr. O’Malley!
Mr. Frosh and Mr. O’Malley have made no reference to U.S. Senator Ted Cruz and his recommendations about waiting until the Newtown Police report is finished and released before anyone makes ANY decision.
Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi6gZU01yF8
Did Mr. Frosh or Mr. O’Malley mention that more than 1100 former Green Berets, for example, have written a letter that puts forward their suggestions for how to deal with what they call a “complex sociological problem” not a “gun problem”.
1) Support the Second Amendment
2) Support State and Local School Boards in establishing safety protocols in “whatever form they deem necessary and adequate”. They point out that state and local governments can be creative in solving problems and there is no one-size-fits all solution.
3) Advocate for Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) laws in every state. Those allow the courts to order certain individuals with mental disorders to comply with treatment while living in the community. In every mass shooting, they point out, the perpetrators have been mentally unstable.
4) Support the return of firearms safety programs to schools. Those courses can be taught in schools by sworn peace officers or other trained professionals.
5) Work to discourage glorification of gratuitous violence in movies and games be discouraged. Note that our best warriors say that war and war-like behavior should not be glorified. As they say “War is not a game and should not be ‘sold’ as entertainment to our children.”
6) Support the repeal of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. They point out it may sound counter-intuitive, but the fact is that they just don’t work.
7) Border states should take responsibility for implementation of border control laws to prevent illegal shipments of firearms and drugs. With the “dismal performance record that is misguided and inept (“Fast and Furious”), they believe that border States are far more competent at the mission than the federal authorities.
8) Everyone take personal responsibility for their choices and actions, not abdicate responsibility to someone else under the illusion that we have “done something that will make us all safer”.
“We have a responsibility to stand by our principles and act in accordance with them,” they write, “Our children are watching and they will follow the example we set.
The President of the United States or the governor of this state make no mention of the “Fast and Furious” . Why is that? Why has no one has been prosecuted for breaking guns laws that are already on the books?
Why are they not standing up for the people that were killed by the guns from the “Fast and Furious”? No one cares about them because there is nothing to be gained politically. Shame on all of you. Brian Terry a Border Patrol agent was killed with guns from the “Fast and Furious”
In September 2011, ATF estimated that Fast and Furious weapons had been recovered at eight violent crimes in Mexico. As CBS News has reported, guns trafficked under ATF’s watch in a separate investigation were also used in the murder of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agent Jaime Zapata in Mexico in February 2011. The families of both Terry and Zapata are suing government officials for alleged negligence and related claims. Who’s standing up for them?
Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-34222_162-57559809-10391739/fast-and-furious-gun-found-at-mexican-crime-scene/
We need the federal , state, or local government to do more to enforce the gun laws that are on the books. All branches of the government have no money and the last thing they want to do is prosecute more gun crimes and send the convicted person to jail. This cost the states money that they don’t have correct? $20,000.00 + a year for each inmate incarcerated.
We need to hold these criminals responsible for their actions and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the laws that we already have!
Maryland collects sales tax on firearms and the ammo we purchase. Why not put that to work by putting more cops on the streets and enforcing the existing gun laws in the counties where there is a problem?
Why do the law abiding citizens in Western Maryland, the Eastern Shore and Northern & Southern Maryland have to pay the price for the few counties that cannot and will not do what is required to arrest and incarcerate ALL GUN Violations in their county?
A Maryland based business stated:
Jeffrey Reh, general counsel for firearm manufacturer Beretta, which has a plant in Accokeek, warned lawmakers that O’Malley’s bill, which outlaws 45 types of weapons and their knockoffs, could have a severe impact on the company’s business. He also said that because gun manufacturers in Maryland are required to register as firearm dealers, it’s unclear whether the company would still be allowed to export guns for sale in other states.
“We’re confronted with a state government that wants to ban the products we make,” Reh said. “Not surprisingly, we are concerned.”
Everyone is concerned about what the liberal democrats will do to all of gun owner’s rights.
I cannot stand by any longer and let a few take away my rights and my fellow law abiding citizen’s rights. Abraham Lincoln said “ It is a sin to remain silent when it is your duty to protest”
Today ”I PROTEST”
Tom Grosh
Comment by Tom Grosh — February 16, 2013 @ 5:30 am
I do support the decisions of these companies. Last night I took it a step further while shopping for a craft beer. I noticed that the beer was made in Harrisburg, PA so I chose another brand.
Comment by Jack — February 16, 2013 @ 5:31 am
I fully support any and all company’s actions to protect 2nd amendment rights for citizens in every state of the union . The States implementing the most restrictive actions should be the focus of the most assertive counter measures by voters and manufacturers alike .
Comment by Michael C. Revak — February 16, 2013 @ 5:32 am
GUN MANUFACTURERS – WELCOME TO OHIO! Come one, come all. Ohio welcomes each and everyone of you. Your business is greatly appreciated and we support your position.
Comment by Larry Allen — February 16, 2013 @ 5:35 am
I respect and support what companies are doing regarding restricting sells of equipment to LEOs and government agencies to that which is legal for citizens in their jurisdictions to possess and the considerations of some companies to relocate. Also I heard recently in the news that freshman senator Ted Cruz (one of my governmental representatives) extended to several firearms related companies the invitation to move to Texas. I believe that was a good gesture. I don’t wish upon any family the loss of their livelihood, but a line has to be drawn somewhere. When people in states like California and New York see the economic effect of the ideology embodied in the people they have elected maybe they will go to the polls and correct their mistakes.
Comment by David Waarren — February 16, 2013 @ 5:36 am
Absolutely I support the firearms industry in our fight to keep our second amenbment rights intact. The socialist liberal politicians and media are way off base. The recent spate of murder-suicides show that there is a problem with the development and mental health of our young male population. Whatever the cause I see no reason to infringe on the gun-rights of mature, responsible adults in this country.
Comment by JT Cernek — February 16, 2013 @ 5:37 am
It’s about time! The U.S. Constitution is about God given Rights that are enshrined by divinity to the People of America. No State or Federal government can take away these Rights, since these Rights did not originate from any government source.
Comment by Allison Beringer — February 16, 2013 @ 5:37 am
totaly applaud these companies that are refusing sales to the facists. come on and move to more freedom loving states. JUST LEAVE ANY LIBERAL MORES YOU HAVE THERE. too many people bring what they hate where they live with them and want to change where they move to to what they left.
Comment by george doby — February 16, 2013 @ 5:40 am
I live in Colorado and for the first time in my life I am ashamed to call myself a native. I applaud the efforts of all the companies like PMAG and will make sure that when I make any future purchases it will be from these companies. I do wish that someone would publish a list of these bold companies so I could distribute them to all of my friends so they can also buy from them!! I wish all the gun and ammunition companies would do the same and refuse to sell to anyone that doesn’t abide by the 2nd amendment. Cheaper Than Dirt has a customer for life in me!!!
Comment by Edward Eggleston — February 16, 2013 @ 5:42 am
Thank you to all gun related companies who are now demonstrating courage by resisting the war on our Bill of Rights. The enemies of freedom are well funded, well organized, disciplined and ideologically zealous. It is rare that we see anyone courageous enough to stand up against them publicly. We eagerly await a coherent counter-offensive by all of us with a stake in our freedoms and are inspired by those taking the initiative, individually, until a much broader coordination appears. I will make every effort to do as much business with any and all of the brave companies who are now making a stand.
Comment by Dave Stone — February 16, 2013 @ 5:43 am
This is a great movement, and it will, hopefully, gain some serious momentum. It will take guts and sacrifices by the manufacturers, but that’s what got us the Bill of Rights in the first place. I think they should take it a step further and – short of violating existing contracts – refuse to service firearms already owned by those “more equal” than the rest of us.
How about it, Ruger? Smith? Colt? You know who you are. Can you stand up?
Comment by Bob Christensen — February 16, 2013 @ 5:44 am
If I dont need it then neither does LE. I am my first line of defence. Use any means at your disposal to pressure these anti gun states into respecting citizens 2nd amenment rights. & move to another state if your business is in an anti state!
Comment by Brian Crittendon — February 16, 2013 @ 5:51 am
To All Gun and accessory mfgs.
if i were in the gun or other related business and my state is not wanting gun and goods sold or owned by citizens, i would move to a state that did like my business and create some jobs for people and revenue for those that dont threaten out 2nd amendant rights. so New York State with you Gov, And Leading Mayor against you,. move south, we welcome you and your business..
Comment by roger — February 16, 2013 @ 5:53 am
I am so proud of those companies. I think every company should do the same. Cheaper then dirt, i applaud you. I live in NJ they are passing horrible laws. I will move to PA as soon as i can, God willing
Comment by bill bauer — February 16, 2013 @ 5:54 am
We would welcome all an any manufacturer of firearms, in the state of GEORGIA.We love ourhunting hertiage and time of fellowship with other shooters and hunters. Remember this is not just about guns rights alone but a step to restricting our other rights and freedoms too.
ANY GOVERNMENT THAT IS STRONG ENOUGHT TO GIVE YOU EVERYTHING, IS ALSO STRONG ENOUGHT TO TAKE IT ALL AWAY………SO WHAT DO YOU THIBK THEY ARE DOING NOW?
THIS is the way other countries have gone, it only made the crooks and thieves more
active and brave as predators.
Comment by JOHN MITCHELL — February 16, 2013 @ 5:56 am
I live in Alabama and our Great Governor Bently along with our Great Senators Richard Shelby and Senator Jeff Sessions stand up for our rights, and we will not follow any Fedral law that violates the Consitution! I have worked here for the last twenty years as a Manufacturing Engineer and Alabama has a common sence approach to Enviromental issues, fair taxes, and has brought in alot of new companies to our state because of that. We have a great talant base of skilled workers in machining, welding,processing and any skill that anyone would need to build products. Great schools, affordable housing and wonderful real American People. We are a “Right to work state” and this would be a great place for any company to move their operation to.
Comment by Harold (Lee) Smith — February 16, 2013 @ 5:56 am
Don’t sell them a thing. And Im recently retired LE. Any company in CA should leave to a more business friendly State. Im also a trapped re of this fascist State.
Comment by mark shaffer — February 16, 2013 @ 5:56 am
100% support companies owned and staffed by true Americans standing up and saying “enough” to the government of the people that is neither of nor for the people!
Comment by jeff — February 16, 2013 @ 5:59 am
I fully support your efforts to fight back. It is important that in the recent climate of government bullying, that business and the individual American start to take a noticeable stand. It is time to hold the government accountable as a servant of the people, not the people as a servant of the government.
This administration has proved in a short time what can happen to freedom when good people do nothing.
Bring your manufacturing to Texas. We will maintain our freedom.
Thank you,
Comment by Gary Hash — February 16, 2013 @ 6:00 am
I think that all the manufactures should follow suite.
those companies like Smith and Wesson and Savage here in this state should follow to include the possibility of relocating to a friendly state.
united they will have a great impact on state and federal governments.
Comment by MTCH — February 16, 2013 @ 6:03 am
I fully support the rights of the people pertaining to the 2nd amendment. I also agree and support companies who choose not to conduct business with states or LE agencies that will not allow lawful citizens to defend themselves with the same types of weapons that criminals use, including high capacity semi-auto. So to those companies like Larue, DPMS, Sturm Ruger or any others who want to move to a State that supports the rights of its people to keep and bear arms to defend themselves, consider Oklahoma. IMHO I believe the people as well as the states leaders would welcome the opportunity for companies to come here and offer further employment, IMO.
Comment by mark — February 16, 2013 @ 6:04 am
When a state or other subdivision declares a product illegal then agents of that state or subdivision are breaking the law by using that product. But in the long run these severe restrictions by governments will be struck down by the SCOTUS, because they are nothing but populist kabuki theater by politicians.
I hope all major gun makers join the “boycotts”, forcing government agencies to shop for foreign makers. But most major agencies have policies against buying foreign goods (witness the failure of the Chevy Impala police cruiser made in Australia).
Liberals often to see future unintended consequences in their quest for utopia.
Comment by JiminGA — February 16, 2013 @ 6:06 am
I commend the actions of these companies, and will show my approval by inquiring about and buying products from manufacturing facilities outside of anti-gun controlled states/districts.
I also intend to avoid anti-gun states. Why should my money end up in the tax coffer of states I dis-agree with?
Comment by Bob — February 16, 2013 @ 6:08 am
I totally agree with these gun manufacturers. It takes a strong belief in the American people and their products to enact restrictions such as this. All of the gun manufacturers and dealers should get together and organize to restrict sales to all government agencies and police departments. It’s time to push back!
Comment by Mark — February 16, 2013 @ 6:08 am
New York resident for more than 45 yrs and I now ready to get out of here. Disgusted with the politicians here and the idiot governor. I hope Remington fire arms decides to leave the state too.
Comment by B. Percival — February 16, 2013 @ 6:10 am
I like the idea. The only problem is what are unintended consequences?
Could this be done on a federal level or are the contracts too lucrative to pass up?
Comment by Wil — February 16, 2013 @ 6:14 am
What is good for the citizens is good for government and LE. I support these above-mentioned companies and any other companies with similar policies. I will certainly support them with my business and word-of-mouth advertisment.
Comment by Jim O'Daniel — February 16, 2013 @ 6:14 am
I completely agree with evry company who has decided not to sell to these Tyranical Regions of our government. Keep up the good work.
Mark Vukovic
Comment by Mark Vukovic — February 16, 2013 @ 6:15 am
I support these companies in their actions and hope more companies will follow their examples
Comment by Don Skaggs — February 16, 2013 @ 6:17 am
I would love to have any of the gun companies or any parts of guns manufacturers move to Idaho. When they do not sell to/in states that are banishing weapons or mags or anything to do with guns is GREAT!
Comment by Avery Brown — February 16, 2013 @ 6:18 am
It is about time more companies got on this wagon. If we could only convince every gun maker in CA, CT, NY, and IL to more to a state that doesn’t hate them. To bad the big guys like Remington colt will never follow.
Comment by Gun_nut — February 16, 2013 @ 6:19 am
I salute the companies that are standing with the citizens to fight these stupid gun restrictions. I also support any manufacturer that wants to move their operation to a gun friendly state. I’m sure Texas would welcome one and all.
Comment by Mike — February 16, 2013 @ 6:20 am
1) If you live in one of the states that are further tightening gun laws (California and New York, to name two examples), will you still support the firearms-related companies that decamp for other states?
ABSOLUTELY ! Send a message ! I respect manufacturers and vendors that stand up to the uniformed, misleading, self serving jugarnaut government. I will be, and shall purchase, from those that stand up for our rights. If all shooters support the vendors and manufacturers, the money lost now will be short term. I would like to see a listing of the vendors and manufacturers that go the extra mile. We will support them and purchase exclusively from them. Spread the word.
If you live in one of the states whose gun laws promote gun ownership, do you want companies such as Savage and Sturm Ruger (based in Connecticut) or Weatherby (based in California) to move your state? I live in Maryland with an absolute fool named OMalley and his croney speaker Miller. I find it absolutely disgusting that they fight the “will issue” status but THEY can carry while we can NOT. This is not a state that would accept a manufacturer.
Do you support LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms, and these other companies in their efforts to restrict LE sales in anti-gun states?
OMG – I LOVE this tactic. Let them build their own then. IF you can get ALL manufacturers to band together, let’s see what the governments would do then. Money talks, but sometimes you just got to send a hard line message.
Do you favor most companies’ response to match LE goods to local restrictions, or do you think Olympic’s ban on sales to New York State agencies and personnel is the right move?
Total sale ban will hit them hard. Let the governors give them sling shots to protect themselves.
Will their efforts make any difference?
Over time, it will sqeeze them hard. Trick is, who blinks first.
Should other manufacturers follow suit?
In numbers, there is strengh. Divided, they will fail.
Keep up the good work. I have been shooting all my life and usually do not get so emotional about goobermint goings on. I am not an absolute hard line advocate and nutjob. I believe that there can be middle ground without infringments. Address teh overall problems, not just the gun itself. That is the easy route. BUT, I and anyone with grey matter between their ears can see that this is a outright move to capitalize on a very tragic event. Talk about LOWLIFES, our governments are truely showing the slim that they are by using this sad tragedy by pitting emotions as a means to drive an agenda – really sad.
Comment by Larry — February 16, 2013 @ 6:20 am
Thank God for brave and principled men, women and their businesses.
I’ll only do business with you.
Comment by chuck kuhns — February 16, 2013 @ 6:21 am
Good for you! Cheaper Than Dirt, LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms and York Arms you are doing the right thing here and we appreciate your sacrifices! We know you are losing business by curtailing some of your sales, but this is obviously due to asinine restrictions put in place by unpatriotic and unAmerican politicians. Thank you again, in the long run this will force the politicians to reconsider their positions and to do the right thing for the law abiding citizen responsible gun owner.
Comment by Steve — February 16, 2013 @ 6:22 am
I live in florida and completely support gun/ammo manufacturers and law abiding gun owners to move to the south where firearms are embraced. The buisinesses will bring jobs and more armed citizens will make this area safer while the unarmed areas of the country get more and more like Chicago and other criminal friendly zones.
Comment by Derek Perry — February 16, 2013 @ 6:24 am
This gun band and hire restrictions are not going to stop criminals and psychos from getting them. It will be harder for lawful people to guns. But how will still get them any way. Thats righ, the criminals and psychos. They. Care about the laws. We don’t blame cars for drunk driving death. But they happen every 30day minutes in this country.
Comment by sean boucher — February 16, 2013 @ 6:24 am
Good for the arms and equipment makers who are standing behind their convictions! If the governement agencies can’t get their stuff, maybe our lawmakers will wake up. And how can a state legislature override federal laws? By circumventing the Constitution and whittling away at our freedoms. Well, two can play that game. If the citizenry can’t have “X-type” of firearm, ammo, or magazine, then neither can law enforcement agenices! I guess LE will have to go to China to get there guns now–oh, that’s right, China won’t sell their AK’s to the US!
Comment by Virginia Bergman — February 16, 2013 @ 6:26 am
maryland is trying to enact strongher gun laws. they already have 3rd most strick. only ones going to hurt are us law abiding gun owners. i guess they will go after the knives next. i do agree with these companies doing this. we do need to stand strong and togerther. from cecil co. md.
Comment by allen foulk — February 16, 2013 @ 6:27 am
I fully support these companies in their decision not to sell to hypocritical states and local govt’s.
I just wish these companies would take their manufacturing to friendlier states.
I live in MO and we would roll out the Tax Free welcome mat for these companies to setup shop in our state.
Let these liberal anti 2nd Amendment states dry up with no tax base and no funding to feed their socialist agenda.
MOVE TO MISSOURI! We need the Jobs!
Comment by ALAN S — February 16, 2013 @ 6:30 am
My highest respects go out to Cheaper than Dirt and all of the manufacturers listed in the article who are making their voices heard by taking action in their businesses. These bold steps are going to be necessary for our country and its leaders to wake up and realize that the citizens of this country will not cower to the plots of socialistic groups to neuter our country’s ability to defend its self like they have done in many European countries, Australia and others.
There may be much higher consequences to come, but that is when people of this country will have to decide what they value more: “liberty or death” or “slavery and submission”.
Comment by Alan P. — February 16, 2013 @ 6:34 am
South Carolina would be more than happy for you to relocate here. We are also a right to work state.
Comment by Rick — February 16, 2013 @ 6:37 am
What a great idea… I would like to know who had this brainstorm. With some tactical thought and a willingness to support the law abiding gun owner we can put the shoe on the other foot. I can only wish that all manufactures would jump on the wagon and if financially possible follow in the footsteps with more of these innovative ideas. It gives the entire gun community hope and an incentive to support these companies with future sales. I would really like to see the millitary suppliers contact their congressmen and let them know that ideas such as this culd have a snowball effect. Support your “local gun owners think tank”.
Comment by David Treosch — February 16, 2013 @ 6:37 am
I live in NC. We remain a firearm friendly state. I am hoping that companies such as Magpul, Ruger, Remington etc would consider opening up shop in NC. We have skilled labor, a business friendly environment, a conservative legislature and incentives for companies looking to relocate. Besides that NC is a great place to live and raise a family.
Comment by Richard Bell — February 16, 2013 @ 6:38 am
Move to Virgina! Rural labor is cheap. Weather is mild. Right to work state! Supportive of gun ownership. And you will be right next to the trouble makers in DC. I95 cover the whole easter seaboard for easy distribution. What are you waiting for. Relocate to VA now. Texas is also great but the weather here is milder and you are close enough to thump your nose at DC.
Comment by R W Gore — February 16, 2013 @ 6:40 am
This is an *excellent* tactic by the gun companies. I am glad they thought of it. Whoever found this solution is a genius. I will strongly support all companies that make this decision, and effective immediately I will not support those companies who do not join these brave patriotic companies. In fact, if ALL the gun companies do it, we will be able to put the gun grabbers and assault on the second amendment completely out of business instantly. Hopefully the huge government vendors like S&W and Ruger and Remington see this opportunity for the great power it has, and stops their sales to the us military immediately also, unless full second amendment rights are restored nationally.
(This action by the gun companies is our force multiplier. This power has been in our grasp all along. Let’s swing this to a huge win for patriots. Well done!)
(Who thinks that Obama will nationalize and put under govetnment control their biggest military vendor companies if they try what Olympic has done? Nationalization of even one gun company is our line in the sand, Patriots.
Comment by Mass. Patriot — February 16, 2013 @ 6:41 am
I think that the firearm manufactures should stop selling to all federal, state, and local agencies in states that are anti firearm. Let them enforce their laws with bow and arrows.
Comment by Barry Ferguson — February 16, 2013 @ 6:42 am
I wholly support the actions taken by CTD, LaRue, Olympic and others. I will only support those companies and purchase from them.
I applaud the position they have taken.
Comment by Frank Horner — February 16, 2013 @ 6:42 am
I agree with the above statement, when a local citizen is disallowed owner ship of a weapon, then the local gov’t employees shouldn’t be allowed to either. Our elected “0fficials” are going to push mfg’s to other countries and creat a huge blackmarket in firearms and ammo, and then spend billions trying to police it like the illicit drug trade! What America need is a thorough house cleaning of all of our state and federal gov’ts!
gary
Comment by Gsry Moseley — February 16, 2013 @ 6:43 am
I wholeheartedly support this action, but it’s going to take more than those few companies that are already on board. It will take those large firearm manufacturers that actually hold most of the government contracts.
For starters, Glock, Sig, Smith, Colt and Beretta would have to join this effort in order for it to have any significant impact on government agencies.
Comment by M40 — February 16, 2013 @ 6:43 am
Not selling to the municipalities and agencies in states that limit citizen’s rights is a great Idea, however it needs to extend to repairs, repair parts and ammo. This should include embargoing armors courses and other repair/maintenance courses for the offending agencies.
For example the Chicago LEO agencies should be embargoed all firearms! The rest of IL should be severely limited as they limit the citizens. New York should get absolutely no ammo, repairs, repair parts, or repair/maintenance courses. California and Colorado are next as is MN.
Next is warranty work…buy back the broken equipment rather than repairing it for the offending agencies.
We also need the MAJOR manufacturers such as Glock and S&W to join the embargo of states and municipalities that limit the citizen’s 2nd amendment rights.
Comment by Joe — February 16, 2013 @ 6:44 am
I like it. I commend these companies for taking a hard stance against state and federal government infringement on the rights of its citizens. If a 12 gauge or low capacity magazines are considered suitable for the defense of American citizens then they should work just fine for those agencies.
Comment by Rob Mitchell — February 16, 2013 @ 6:45 am
Bravo. I most certainly will support any and all Manufacturers who take a stand against these ridiculous anti gun laws. I also encourage more manufacturers to step up and take a stand.
Comment by Terry — February 16, 2013 @ 6:47 am
If all of the companies jump on board this really could make an impact. It will be tough on companies like Glock where a large amount of their sales come from Law Enforcement sales. If they all do it though, it should not be too long until things change and those companies get their sales back. This is probably the best option for fighting back and I will support any company that takes this stand.
Comment by Joel — February 16, 2013 @ 6:47 am
I support the actions of those manufacturers/suppliers who respect individuals rights to own firearms of all types without limit on ammunition. Relinquishing that right and yet allowing LE/Government Agencies to buy ammo and firearms without restriction is very dangerous. As a decorated Viet Nam Vet, I fought for the freedoms we are supposed to have in this country. I shall continue to exercise those freedoms to my last breath.
Comment by David Luikart — February 16, 2013 @ 6:49 am
I support these manufactures in their right to not sell their products to gov. or L.E. agencies that are trying to enact or have enacted gun control laws that violate the 2nd amendment. I will continue to buy these manufacturers products and services
Comment by Ron Glover — February 16, 2013 @ 6:50 am
I absolutely support the position taken by manufacturing firms to refuse to sell their products to LE and governmental agencies if the same product is prohibited to citizens in that jurisdiction. In this economic climate there are only two ways to influence politicians. One it loss of jobs, business, and tax revenue which these policies will impact and the second is obviously the vote. There are enough gun owners in this country to influence, or even win, any election on any level. So if we lose our gun rights we have only ourselves to blame. Gun owners need to support business entities which produce guns and related products, they need to register to vote and vote, and they need to support national, state and local gun organizations with their time and money.
Comment by Jack Well — February 16, 2013 @ 6:51 am
What liberals just can’t grasp is that choices have consequences. These actions are precisely the kind of consequences that should be happening. I for one will not spend one dime of my disposable income for anything, not so mch as a pair of socks that come from blue states. Crush these states economically.
Comment by Steve Q — February 16, 2013 @ 6:52 am
The question posed is extremely broad and the purpose might be better served by breaking it down to bite-sized pieces. I absolutely laud the companies who move their operation to a friendly locale — it makes no sense for opponent states to get revenue taxes that work against us, especially in CA, NY and like-minded states. And I believe they would all be welcome in NH, which is the home of SigSauer and branches of other major manufacturers.
I’m less sure about limiting Law Enforcement (LE) sales to whatever the citizens may purchase; it makes perfect sense from a 2nd Amendment perspective but I’m very concerned whenever LE is outgunned by the bad guys. But I suppose they can ask the National Guard or Feds to supply their exotica — which might cut into the quantities the Government is hoarding. So I’m leaning in favor of the sales restriction to LE.
Comment by Rog in NH — February 16, 2013 @ 6:52 am
LaRue and Olympic are doing the right thing and I appreciate what they are doing. I am from an anti gun state, I pay 10% income tax to the state and $10,000+ per year property tax on my home in large part because of municipal unions which include the police. A police offer retires here after 20 years (yes he could be just 41 years old) with a six figure pension for life and medical benefits private people cannot buy even if they could afford them. Why is this relevant? The reason is because the municipal unions have vested interest in ensuring that the public will not seek work force or budget reductions. One way to do that for the police is to convince people that they cannot trust others particularly those who may own firearms and that they are dependent upon police protection for safety. LE needs to get some message that there are consequences when they contribute to this hysteria.
Comment by Ben — February 16, 2013 @ 6:53 am
LaRue and Olympic Arms are the leaders of freedom in 2013. It would be nice to see other companies following there moral & just ways. Further, i would gladly welcome all pro-2nd amendment manufacturing companies to move here to the great state of Michigan.
Comment by Michael — February 16, 2013 @ 6:54 am
We hope to move out of New York state to a normal state where gun ownership is recognized as nothing out of the ordinary. We support the idea of not selling guns and I would ammunition to authorities who consider themselves above the law.
Anyone who wishes to help I would like to create a website helping people in California and New York who wish to move to friendlier States We would provide gun law info and cost ratios. Please help me get this done.
Comment by Philip Viverito — February 16, 2013 @ 6:55 am
As a 17 year Veteran Law Enforcement Officer, I applaud the efforts of Olympic Arms and other companies who will refuse to do business with State, County and Municipal Law Enforcement Agencies that are in States that do not support private ownership of firearms. I know that I have nothing to fear from a law abiding gun owner and also know that private ownership of firearms and in fact concealed carry of firearms deters crime. It’s so simple for me to understand that gun laws only effect those that obey the law to begin with. Any additional anti-gun legislation will only effect those who don’t break the law to begin with. Criminals will not magically begin to obey the law! That’s why we call them criminals! They committ crimes! I was a gun owner prior to entering law enforcement and held a concealed carry permit. I support the right of all citizens to have the same protection afforded to me. The day they ask me to begin confiscating privately owned firearms from citizens, I will turn in my badge and fight back! I wish that all of the firearm manufacturers would relocate to the Great State of Alabama, where we still believe that the Constitution of the United States of America is a sacred document.
Brad Penton
NRA Life Member
Comment by Brad Penton — February 16, 2013 @ 6:55 am
As a new firearm owner I am appalled at the governmental bullying of companies and citizens regarding their rights to own and bear arms. The latest round of restrictions in states like NY only go to show their real intent and that is to ban firearms altogether. It’s great to see companies stand up against this bullying. If given the chance I will support any company that relocates or refuses to do business in states that promote restrictions.
Remember people, elections do have consequences!!
Comment by David Geiger — February 16, 2013 @ 6:56 am
please move to Alabama, we would love to have you here
Comment by b parker — February 16, 2013 @ 6:56 am
How many times must history repeat itself before people will learn from the past? How far must our “Chancellor’s Reich Congress” go to banning all weapons before people realize that then only his shock troops and the criminal element (differences?) will have weapons and all the power?
I applaud the actions by the mentioned businesses and as far as the state of Florida protects my rights, I encourage them to come here to the Panhandle to set up shop. Heck, I’d be plumb tickled to have them.
Comment by John Stanley — February 16, 2013 @ 6:56 am
I totally support the companies like LaRue and Olympic and I wish all the Arms and Arms related suppliers would follow suit. One of these days we have to take back our country, and I prefer doing it economically rather than militarily.
Comment by Jim — February 16, 2013 @ 6:58 am
I applaud the companies that have the integrity to stand up to the government and match sales between LE and civilians. I also welcome them to relocate to the magnificent State of Texas as does our state and local governments. C’mon down y’all, we appreciate ya.
Comment by Jeff Beach — February 16, 2013 @ 6:58 am
American civilians own an estimated 270 million guns, or about 90 guns for each 100 people. The U.S. military has about 3 million guns. All law enforcement agencies have less than 1 million. Also, you may have seen the new American University survey of 4,000 high school and college students, which found that 60% of these young people definitely intend to own a gun, or are considering owning a gun.
The uptrend in U.S. individual gun ownership is almost a mirror image of another trend: A long-term decline in total U.S. gun violence against young people.
States which legislated more open citizen access to concealed weapons permits during 1976-95 saw mass homicides decline 84%, and gun deaths decline by 90%. Researchers John Lott of Yale and William Landes at the University of Chicago concluded from several studies: “The only policy factor to have a consistently significant influence on multiple victim public shootings is the passage of concealed handgun laws.” By that, they mean greater access to concealed-carry permits. Here in Black Hawk County, IA, my friend, Sheriff Tony Thompson, says 5,000 citizens have concealed carry permits. That’s 1 person in 25.
Comment by Jerry Carlson — February 16, 2013 @ 6:59 am
Must applaud gun mfrs and sporting outlets that make important decisions to not do business with govt/LE orgs in overzealous gun-control states. With R Emmanuel’s call in Chicago for banks to not do business with gun mfrs, economic retaliation is now in play. Urban police chiefs, NY State & CA LE officials standing behind the new gun-control efforts will hopefully find their grandstanding has become a measurable budget detriment. When budget money gets in the way, these folks often find themselves quickly stepping down from the grandstand.
Comment by B Joyce — February 16, 2013 @ 6:59 am
I support these companies to ban sales of arms and equipment to LE and government agencies if the state does not allow private citizens to purchase the items. I will definitely support these companies if they move to a more 2nd amendment friendly state. It costs a lot of money to pull up stakes and move your business. I will support these moves with the most potent power i have. My wallet.
Comment by Rick Scott — February 16, 2013 @ 7:01 am
I am thankful for all that is being done to stop the irrational actions of our lawmakers. Thank you. We are going to Pro-gun rallies here in NY to show them what we think about the 2nd Amemdment and our right to bear arms. If we lose this one, the 1st will fall next.
But, I am afraid they have their agenda already made, and they don’t care about our wishs.
So, I think the only thing that will affect them is hitting them in the pocket. So any company that can help us take a stand we will support. Thanks so much.
Comment by Earl Schultz — February 16, 2013 @ 7:04 am
Olympic arms and the other manufacturers absolutely made the right move by refusing to sell their products to states LE / Mil. agencies who choose to Unlawfully / Unconstitutionally restrict the rights of their citizens.
This policy should also be observed by every U,S bullet manufacturer as well.
It’s time that Congress gets a sample of what it’s like to not have the means of protection that every American is rightfully entitled to.
How else are we going to stop these Unconstitutional gun grabs, (short of an all out Civil war if they keep pushing us), if we don’t start standing up to these Communists in the Federal and States Legislatures?
Millions of Americans are going to refuse to comply to these Unconstitutional gun grab laws, and it would certainly give our effort some teeth if the firearms, bullets, and accessories manufacturers would stand with us and keep us armed as we get closer to putting the Criminal gun grabbers in their rightful place.
You can bet that I will be purchasing a couple Olympic arms AR-15′s just as soon as the supply reaches my local gun store again.
I will also be adding other accessories as well. The gun grabbers are in for a fight, and hopefully the 2nd AMENDMENT will have the support of the every Firearms / accessories manufacturer in the country. It is your key to survival as much as it is the key to keeping our Liberty intact in this free nation.
Comment by FreeAmerican — February 16, 2013 @ 7:05 am
I think this is a great idea I think what is good for the everyday civilian it should be goog enough for law enforcement if we cannot own the firearms or accessories than they should not be able either.
Comment by Sean — February 16, 2013 @ 7:07 am
I look at these firearms manufacturers with admiration due to their stance, they truly are putting their money where their mouth is in this case. State and federalies need to realize since they can’t or won’t control the criminal element either because of lack of political will, lack of money , ( because they use the money for their other more important liberal / progressive causes. ) , or just can’t . Should realize the American citizen won’t stand forever against their constant eroding of our freedoms and their knee jerk feel good political actions that do little to curb gun violence and or crime. The guns used by criminals are not ones they have had background checks for anyhow!!! Hello! Those firearms manufactures should close up shop and move to friendlier locals. It may hit the states in their tax payer pocketbook and make a difference. But then they ( state and fed govts. ) may start getting their guns from their political equals ,the Russian and Chinese govts. For weapons to use against the citizens of the United States.
Comment by Patriotagent — February 16, 2013 @ 7:11 am
I’d support any gun company to be located in Arkansas. They’d be welcome and find plenty of workers ready to go.
Comment by Rowane — February 16, 2013 @ 7:12 am
I think what the gun companies are doing is fantastic. What’s legal for one, is legal for all. Hell yes. NOW WHEN ARE WE GONNA GET OUR AMMO though?! Sheesh louise, apparently the good ol govt can get THEIR hands on plenty, even in a time of need, so hellooo? Keep up there, all you ammo manufacturers…don’t sell to govt angencies!
Here in Virginia, we’re pretty gun friendly. Our legislators recently shot down all of the proposed bills submitted regarding gun control (basically, a state-level mimic of Feinstein’s bullsh*t)…the Dems are still pushing, but so far they’re pushing on a big mule who’s decided not to budge – US. So hey there DPMS (of who I own an AP4 and LOVE IT btw), c’mon and move to Va. We’ll welcome you with open arms!
Semper Fi & stay strong.
Comment by Scottie Hamer — February 16, 2013 @ 7:14 am
I applaud the efforts of those companies who match LE sales to civilian sales.I feel that sends a strong message about their respect for all of our 2nd amendment rights because it has the potential to affect their bottom line in lost sales. I would like to see all firearms companies and ammo manufacturers enact similar policies. As a consumer I will purchase items from a company with such a policy in preference to a company without such a policy. One of our greatest methods of influence is when we speak with our dollars and support those companies and organizations who strongly support our rights as citizens.
Ken
Comment by Ken — February 16, 2013 @ 7:15 am
The states that banned the guns and magazines are totally out of control.
To control the mayhem why sell ammo to those states to begin with.
Comment by Donald Hartman — February 16, 2013 @ 7:16 am
This is great. We need to protect our 2nd Amendment Rights and all other rights. Pull out of those anti-gun states and don’t sell them anything and see how they like it. Thanks for the information which I will post on Facebook.
Comment by Don McElyea — February 16, 2013 @ 7:16 am
I support any company that refuses to support tyranny in any form. These bans are an unlawful act against the people and need to start be reported as such. I am overwhelmed by the arrogance of any governing body to believes they can pass laws that do not apply to them.
Comment by Tim — February 16, 2013 @ 7:18 am
I commend the companies that are standing up for our rights as well as the states that are also standing up to the Federal Government. I fear that this may divide the United States into two sections, and if it does you may have a group of states that would be divided on more than just the second amendment. I could foresee states that not only allow gun rights, but would stop multi generation welfare. Obama phones might only call 911 and the working people could then pay less for them… etc. Maybe say the pledge of allegiance and a prayer before school. Well you get the idea, the important things our country was based on. I could then see not only companies, but families relocating to states that have their same beliefs. Let’s face it we know what happened in Nazi Germany when gun registration and restrictions started and I know I don’t want to have my family go through that.
Comment by Mitch — February 16, 2013 @ 7:19 am
I recently purchased LaRue Tactical OBR’s in both the 5.56 and 7.62. I am proud of fellow Texans like Larue Tactical that support the second amendment but am blown away by their boldness in speaking out in support of us, the citizen. In todays climate it seems a rare thing to see bravery and backbone in a U.S. company.
I doff my hat to LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms, Cheaper that Dirt, and other companys with likeminds.
Any company with similar backbone, that operate in these liberal “blue” states should move to Texas as soon as possible as we not only embrace them we help them flourish!
Comment by Dudley Land — February 16, 2013 @ 7:19 am
I will support, as much as I can, all companies that practice selective sales to LE/Gov’t entities as a means of keeping our 2nd Amendment rights in tack. The Left is going to push hard and we must all and I mean all gun Enthusiasts band together with our purchases. The purchasing power of millions of Gun Enthusiasts along with our Vote, our support of Gun Rights Organizations WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
I salute the companies who move out of California and New York especially. They can move to not only a friendler location for manufacture but also enjoy substantial State TAX relief. I imagine the TAX relief would help off-set the cost of relocation.
I lived and attended college in California for 5 years. What a traffic nightmare, and the people there are never cordial or friendly as is found in the Southeast.
Comment by John Delaney — February 16, 2013 @ 7:19 am
Come to Indiana! Having just passed “Right to Work,” you can choose whether you want a union or non-union shop, taxes are moderate, and (most of) the people are gun-friendly. Besides, maybe you’ll decide to offer free samples
Comment by Mike Hoppe — February 16, 2013 @ 7:20 am
I applaud the stand the referenced companies are taking and strongly urge that ALL firearm manufacturers and distributors do the same.
Comment by Bob DeLancy — February 16, 2013 @ 7:20 am
I am glad to see this push back by manufacturers and distributors in the firearms industry. Mao Zedong, Chinese dictator, said “real power comes from the barrel of a gun”, also exercised gun control and used that “power” to enslave the Chinese people. If anyone doesn’t think that is not happening here in our country just isn’t a thinking person and isn’t taking their own protection into account for themselves or anyone else. It is only by exercising our dwindling rights to hold our Federal, State and local governments accountable to we the citizens that we will keep our rights as laid down in our Constitution Bill of Rights. If that doesn’t happen, we will slowly; maybe not so slowly loose our rights and become slaves to the government. I am not worried for myself, but I am very concerned for my children and grandchildren’s quality of life in this country if things don’t change for the better.
Comment by Ron — February 16, 2013 @ 7:22 am
I live in Florida. We would be delighted to have gun related businesses relocate here. I definitely appreciate the fact that many gun related businesses will not sell products to LE if the non LE citizens of that state are so limited. Very appropriate response. Thank you and welcome to Florida.
Comment by Peter Myers — February 16, 2013 @ 7:22 am
I am sure any or all these companies will be welcome in Oklahoma.
Like Texas, Oklahoma is still a free state. As far as I know,OKLA is the only state that B O did not carry a single district in either election
Comment by Chuck Lowery — February 16, 2013 @ 7:23 am
I absolutely agree with these companies and the stand they are taking. I’d like to see more companies following suit as well as munitions suppliers too. Stop selling it to the government and give it to the people.
I would like to see Louisiana start actively pursuing some of these companies. I’m a little disappointed they havent been.
Comment by Darren Colletti — February 16, 2013 @ 7:24 am
A-effing-men. I applaud this action and before I buy any ammo or weapons from any company I will surely check to see that they support this ban to LE/Govt agencies. I will also cease to support any police org. like FOP in response to their support of anti-gun legislation.
KevinZurrin
Comment by Kevin Zurrin — February 16, 2013 @ 7:26 am
My congratulations to all the companies for their decisions. I support them whole heartedly and I hope more enterprizes will join them.
Comment by William Hayden — February 16, 2013 @ 7:26 am
I prefer that the companies adopt Olympic Arms stance of no sales. Force our gov’t to have to buy arms from Russia and China. At least then maybe people will start to open their eyes to the 1960′s hippie trash they voted into office.
Comment by DB Cooper — February 16, 2013 @ 7:26 am
The ammunition companies should be doing this as well. These companies should never have sold the government such massive amounts, knowing it would cause a shortage and knowing what the government planned with the ammo.
Comment by David Frisby — February 16, 2013 @ 7:27 am
I agree 100% with these companies. Finally a few companies that realize that the government is not more important than the citizens. Move them all to Texas. We need more companies to push back on the socialist and communist actions of the current president. I will support theses companies to the best of my ability.
Comment by Lee — February 16, 2013 @ 7:28 am
as a former ffl who was run out of business by the atf years ago, I applaud the gun manufacturers for taking a stand against the abuse of power shown by the obama lovers
no le should have the rights that the citizenry can’t share
Comment by edward smith — February 16, 2013 @ 7:28 am
I think Every Manufacturer should get on board and not sell to Gov or LE groups in Ban Areas. In my opinion if you are an officer of the law or a soldier above everything your an american citizen and you should abide by the laws and also should be speaking out against attacks on our contitution, because your the one on the front line fighting the wars for these rights. The article mentioned Minnesota house bill 241 and what it would do to DPMS. I would like to add that Missouri house bill 545 Will do the same to CMMG. Our represenatives in our states take an oath of office to uphold and protect the contitution I want to know why impeachment charges havent been brought against these people for clearly attacking our contitution? And you forgot to mention Colt (based hardford, CT)They can move to my town sure. They better wait to see if HB 545 passes though.
Comment by Larry Motley — February 16, 2013 @ 7:30 am
Hell yes I support all of those fine companies and any and all are welcome and I hope continue to be welcome in Texas. Come on down boys
Comment by Brian — February 16, 2013 @ 7:30 am
I commend all companies restricting sales to government agencies that do not support the second amendment and the constitution of the United States.
Comment by Greg Engler — February 16, 2013 @ 7:30 am
I applaud manufactures of firearms that are taking this stand. I would like to say that I would be pleased to have any of these companies re-locate to my state. However, I live in Illinois!! As you know, Illinois is in the very real danger of having the crime ridden city of Chicago becoming the tail that would wag the dog (ie; the rest of the law biding residents of the state).
Perhaps if all firarm manufactures would take this stand,lawmakers will listen!
Brian McNamara
Comment by Brian McNamara — February 16, 2013 @ 7:31 am
These companies are doing exactly the right thing. I would like to see all the manufacturers in those states move to a state where their products are fully legal.
Comment by Roy L — February 16, 2013 @ 7:33 am
it never fails. one person does something wrong and the masses pay the price. that happens across the board. millions of legal law abiding gun owners, of which i am one, are being held responsible for the actions of a few. we did not write the constitution, we don’t write the laws, we don’t ask for anything but our legal, constitutionally protected right to bear arms. If the laws that are already on the books are prosecuted to their FULLEST extent(no plea bargaining) something good may happen. But, it seems to me that the FEW reign supreme. The old squeaky wheel crap.
i applaude the companies that are not selling product to state personnel that are above the bans. i am an NRA member and i will vote against any politician i can that is supporting ANY ban on any product for weapons.
claude williams
flagler beach, fl
Comment by claude g. williams — February 16, 2013 @ 7:34 am
I absolutely agree with the companies that are pushing back on restrictive state governments. I would hope any of them considering relocation would consider Arizona, where I live as it is a very gun friendly state. It takes courage for companies to face the prospect of lost revenue in favor of principle and I salute those that do so. If individuals in the affected states would do like wise things might improve. I for one have not and WILL NOT comply with any law – local, state, or federal that impinges on any of my inalienable rights, period.
Comment by Rick deCastro — February 16, 2013 @ 7:35 am
I completely support what these companies are doing. Now we need to get all the rest on board. It would be great if all American ammo manufacturers would do this too, and not just to states but the feds as well. Can you imagine what would happen if all ammo companies told the federal government, “We’re not selling you anymore ammo until you drop this pending gun legislation.”
Comment by Svend0311 — February 16, 2013 @ 7:35 am
Hell, Yes! Move on down here to Louisiana!! We’d love to have any manufacturers here and I’d bet you’d do one heck of a good business just in-state!
Comment by Pappy — February 16, 2013 @ 7:36 am
It saddens me for a government established on the scriptures of our great and
glorious GOD to be led down this road. Satan is attacking this great country for one reason, “freedom of religion”. The 2nd amendment is the only barrier preventing the loss of our right to worship the GOD of creation, the father of our Lord Jesus Christ. We must stand strong against this tyranny!
Comment by john carter — February 16, 2013 @ 7:36 am
Bravo! That is America stand up for what you believe in! I applaud these companies their employees and their right to defend our second amendment rights. Without these and other rights established for specific purpose could you imagine the laws these clueless people would pass.
Keep up the good work and voice your opinions to all your representatives after all YOU elected them!
Comment by Mark — February 16, 2013 @ 7:36 am
This is great. I totaly support all of these companies. Thank You All
Comment by william — February 16, 2013 @ 7:37 am
I live in Kentucky and I applaud these companies. Now if we can get the ammo and gun accessories companies to come on board. Any one in any part of the Firearm Industry need a home? We could use the work.
Comment by Stephen — February 16, 2013 @ 7:37 am
Mississippi is a state that I feel will welcome any gun -ammo company to conduct buisness here .we have some small mfg’s here now ,ms. had a ammo plant located on NASA test site ,I thing it was closed due to Government red tape ,firearm & Ammo co. look at ms.We may be a good home for you. Thanks Robert Sellers
Comment by Robert Sellers — February 16, 2013 @ 7:39 am
Small manufacturers pushing back like this wont make a lick of difference. Upstarts in the gun making business will be happy to fill the void. That is unless the coordinated effort of these libs is to drive the small manufactures completely out of business by passing these bills on a state level. That will only leave large manufacturers in business subject to extortion and threat of govts who can yank large orders. We may be witnessing the beginning of an age where only a few number of manufacturers rely on the govt for survival. Libs realize they cannot attact the individual law abiding citizen and the constitution so they are focussing their effor in states where they enjoy a majority in the legislature to attack the induxtry with a bully govet. I would wxpect the next round of legislative assault will be to tax the hell out of companies that manage to stay open in theae states. Wouldnt be surprised if state DES and all other depts suddenly take keen interest in auditing gun makers.
Comment by bartjoebob — February 16, 2013 @ 7:40 am
I believe if Minn passes this law and puts DPMS out of business there the state should be required to purchase this company at full market value AND give every worker a minimum of 1 full years wages as severence. They will have passed a law making a previouslly legal business illegal and taken it from the owners and the workers without just compensation. Its the same as if the gov’t needed my land for a road. They cant just take it . The gov’t has to compensate you at a fair market value.
Comment by DB Cooper — February 16, 2013 @ 7:41 am
I applaud Cheaper Than Dirt and ALL gun retailers and manufacturers who disavow the obvious double standard perpetrated by all LE agencies from the Feds down to local agencies. Our gov’t knows EXACTLY what it’s doing by disarming the populace. A citizenry that cannot defend itself becomes a slave to the state: TOTALITARIANISM.
keep up thre great job you guys and I will continue to purcgase from Cheaper than Dirt !!
Comment by andrew a smith — February 16, 2013 @ 7:41 am
I find this to be exemplarily great action by the manufactures. I sincerely hope this will yield some fruit. I also hope this extends to ammunition. I know many companies depend upon government contracts but if they ceased the sales of ammunition to these government organizations it could be dynamic.
Comment by Tom — February 16, 2013 @ 7:42 am
Locations of firearms manufacturing businesses is an interesting political issue. On one hand locating in a rural area will assure lower taxes and possibly a more friendly local business climate. On the other locating the nearest major city has advantages. Locating in a major city allows for all the advantages such as a pre-existing industrial infrastructure and many more potential skilled employees. It also has the benefit of every dollar being spent locally generates good will and improves the states’ political climate much more. Regardless of where the factory is located, the manufacturer should engage with the community and be a positive force for improving the quality of life in the community and region by being stewards of a great institution.
Just imagine that for a moment imagine that I am starting a gun company. I could locate in a rural area but then possibly not have as much existing infrastructure. Or I could locate in a city that once had a much larger manufacturing base. I would make sure that I paid slightly above prevailing wages and have a profit sharing program. If there is any hint of unionization, fire the managers most responsible. For recruitment, I would make sure that all avenues including less traditional ones are explored so that I don’t overlook any good potential employees. Finally once profitable, engage with the community and support local religious, cultural and charitable projects. I would even go so far as to invite local politicians to gun safety classes and the local rifle range, making sure to get pictures of them proudly holding their best target.
Comment by David — February 16, 2013 @ 7:42 am
It’s good to see manufacturers holding the government and their agencies to the same standards as the citizens. They seem to forget that they work for us and we are not their hostages. I’ve never heard of Creedmoor Sports but since they are relocating to my home state of Alabama I will support them, I wish some other manufacturers would come here as well, we are a very gun-friendly climate. For the sell-outs that support restrictive gun laws by selling to government agencies while restricting sales to the citizens, I would like to see a list published so we can stop supporting them.
Comment by Gregory Tenn — February 16, 2013 @ 7:43 am
I agree with these ideas. It would be nice if more weapons and cosmetic additions manufacturers would move to the South…Texas for one. I for one would welcome them for upholding the 2nd Amendment and forcing the Gov’t to do the same. I also wish ammunition sales would be restricted from the Government. Why or What does DHS have to have millions of bullets and selectable fire rifles? Are they attempting to diminish the flow and sales of ammo to civilians?
Comment by Doug Spillers — February 16, 2013 @ 7:44 am
ATK needs to start refusing govt orders. Janet Napalatano doesnt need to arm the National Weather Service with 2 billion rounds of hollow point ammo that not even our military can use in combat. Citizens should boycott any company that fills her order for 7000 full auto and select fire “personal defense weapons”
Comment by bartjoebob — February 16, 2013 @ 7:44 am
I applaud these companies with the moral courage to refuse to sell to these LE agencies whose politicians have enacted hypocritical and unconstitutional gun control laws. As a career Army Soldier, I have learned to appreciate the freedom in our country, especially after serving in combat zones and seeing where power is so unbalanced simply because people have no way to defend themselves against thugs. I have also seen where restrictive gun laws do nothing but disarm innocent people. Many illegal drugs can be found on any street corner in any American city which proves legislation simply doesn’t work. Where there is demand, there will be supply and we know criminals will always demand guns for their wicked deeds! These pathetic politicians will never understand that simple fact. In their zeal to enact laws, they are making criminals smile and appreciate their efforts to disarm honest people. Although I have always enjoyed competitive shooting, I own firearms for one primary purpose, to defend my family against those who mean evil against them. Politicians have no right to take away that duty I have as a father!
Comment by James — February 16, 2013 @ 7:44 am
I live in Texas thank God, but I openly applaud every gun company who is standing up for our rights. If anyone of you want to move you manufacturing or distribution to West Texas my family has 10,000 acres avaliable to you.
Jeff Hall
Comment by Jeff Hall — February 16, 2013 @ 7:45 am
I will make an effort to purchase from the gun and ammo/accessory manufactures who are taking this position. Here in Missouri our state legislature has a majority of Republicans in both houses and though some crazy gun ban proposals have been made, they have no chance of passing. I am sure that the state would welcome any manufacturer of weapons, ammo, or gun accessories, who is considering leaving one of the states banning these items and putting pressure on them. I hope the big manufacturers like Ruger, Smith and Wesson, etc take this same position. That would probably do more good than anything.
Comment by Kathy Casey — February 16, 2013 @ 7:46 am
Bravo to these companies… I will only purchase from companies that have this policy in the future!
Comment by Rob Tucker — February 16, 2013 @ 7:48 am
I support these companies and any who follow their example.
Comment by Bill Drake — February 16, 2013 @ 7:48 am
I agree with the companies to move to states that are not demanding they restrict the manufacturing of any firearm or product that is eligible to LE and not the public. If LE can own a firearm so should the citizens. Control needs to be the individuals thru the FFL process and each individual. You can’t stop stupid or misconduct by penilizing everyone for a few bad apples.
Also manufactures should not stop making firearm parts for the public and only make them for LE and Government. Thisis why there is a shortage of AR partts, the government is using our money to buy up all of the M4 product. What are there real intensions? These are not for use overseas, seems as if they are arming themselves for homland security and not arming the citizens.
Comment by Edward Sperry — February 16, 2013 @ 7:49 am
Stopping sales to all or any govt agency may be a good start. However, the relocation of any gun making firm will convey a much stronger reaction. You can just about bet your old combat boots that if any or better all the states lose the gun makers & THEIR JOBS they will start crying! Nothing more seems to effect them than a big kick in the wallet!!! It’s just strange to see all these anti-gunners cry about the 2nd amendment, but a large number of them are protected by people packing heat!!! Just recently I sent email to both senators & our rep asking them this question: With over 500 murderers in Chicago, how many were committed with legally purchased guns? Yep, you’re right I haven’t received an answer. It’s starting to look like both fed & state govts are hiding behind the gun control debate, simply because they can’t solve our major problems, that being the economy, unemployment, immigragion & last but not least are unable to pass a budget. If all those fools in congress had been holding a real job they would have been fired long ago!!!
Comment by Ron Kollas — February 16, 2013 @ 7:49 am
Living in Florida isn’t what it used to be. Once a Republican stronghold, and more recently a paradise for retiring Democrats from New York, Conneticut, Illinois, etc., the influx of Northerners has changed the political Demographics of our state. Companies such as Weatherby, Savage and Sturm Ruger, and other firearm manufacturers would be wise to choose a state with a strong Republican contingency, low northern migration, and a highly educated population that can also tell the difference between a Democrat, a leftist, and a Socialist. Socialist, like the one currently in power, must eradicate gun ownership as part of their ongoing agenda to suppress and toil us into submission.
Only in states with a strong Governor unwilling to break from US Constitutional law can any company or citizen seek reprieve till we, the People, do something about it.
Comment by ALLAN DOYLE — February 16, 2013 @ 7:50 am
I too encourage all firearms related manufacturers to adopt policies against selling product to LE and other state agencies located in jurisdictions that adopt gun restriction policies. Come to Oklahoma! Right to work. Friendly and hard working people. Centrally located. Plenty of land. Low cost of living. Conservative base. Open carry and open arms. We still believe in the constitution and are open for business.
Comment by Kevin Warren — February 16, 2013 @ 7:51 am
It is ridiculous this government and state governments think they know what’s best for us. With all the corruption in govt it is inane to think we are heading in the right direction. I applaud these companies and encourage others to follow suit. Once states start loosing business tax revenues they may begin to see the light, I only hope the light is in the form of political pink slips. Stand united people.
Comment by Mark Ladage — February 16, 2013 @ 7:51 am
I agree with much of what everyone has said in the comments. We all need to stand united for our rights. It’s the only way!
Comment by Anthony S — February 16, 2013 @ 7:52 am
I am glad to see these companies have taken a stand and hope Glock, Smith, Remington and Beretta do the same.
Comment by Andy — February 16, 2013 @ 7:53 am
I live in NYS and fully support any effort by gun makers to stop selling to Gov/LE in this state or any state that is similar.The law passed here will be fought to repeal. This type of support by these firms is much appreciated by the citizens who have been impacted and it is my belief that any company that follows suit will be well regarded not only by citizens but by a large portion of LE that understand the importance of well armed citizens.I hope that many other gun related firms enact the same policy as this will send a strong message that the Gov needs to butt out ot this continuing attack on gun owners rights.Go after the criminals and enforce existing gun laws.Thank you.
Comment by John Selkirk — February 16, 2013 @ 7:55 am
thanks for supporting us the aamerican people. I applaud any company that moves out of or refuses to sell to anyone not just state government, local or FEDERAL agencys that restricts our gun rights. I will only buy from companies that respect and help us to keep out gunrights. I live in geogia and you’re welcome to come here, atleast for now.
Comment by will — February 16, 2013 @ 7:55 am
Now Im going to give you guys all my business, thank you to every company that has stood up for us, a patroit will always stand on the side of the people. Thank you!!!
Comment by Heather K — February 16, 2013 @ 7:56 am
I support, and incourage, all companys in their efforts to send these strong messages to all government agencies at all levels. This is a great idea. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” Thank you very much to all who fight back to keep our rights. Pharaoh.
Comment by Pharaoh Magic — February 16, 2013 @ 7:57 am
I totally support the rights of these companies to restrict their sales..we must stand NOW or the next right they are going to go after is our 1 st amendment rights..I live in Texas and any of these companies would be welcomed down here…so come on down YA’ll…
Comment by John Catts — February 16, 2013 @ 7:58 am
Thank you to LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms, Cheaper that Dirt, and other companys with likeminds for sending a message to local and state governments. This is this kind of bold action that can and will change things for the better in this country. I live in California, and while I do not like seeing good businesses like these leave I respect and support their choice to do so. This state like others has become very 2nd Amendment unfriendly and so the only thing left is to move out both for businesses and citizens.
Comment by Michael — February 16, 2013 @ 7:59 am
This is how we can fight back because demonstrations will not work with the gun grabbers; they have an agenda and will not be deterred by us mere serfs or laborers.
This will be a very difficult decision for arms, accessory, and ammo manufacturers to make as it will definitely impact their bottom line. However, this is the only way to fight back against the tyranny that is being implemented short of armed rebellion. We need to call on all manufacturers of arms, accessories, and ammo to stop selling to these governments.
Then the next step is to call on all manufacturers that sell to the federal government to stop selling anything that is not legal for US citizens.
The 2nd Amendment was written to make sure the government doesn’t have anything bigger than the citizen so we can resist with force of arms if necessary.
We need to start a grass roots movement to contact all the manufacturers to enforce this policy.
I have already told my representatives that my wife and I will be leaving Maryland if they enact gun control and do not make concealed carry “shall issue”. Oh yea, and we will relocate our IT company in nearby Virginia as well.
Comment by Rick Albert — February 16, 2013 @ 8:00 am
Being from Colorado and whats going on I commend any company thats willing to take a stand at the unjust actions against lawfull gun Owners. A few make it sound like a majority but thats the way the liberals work. Being from a rural area and shooting all my life and raising a family on a ranch has made my family a stronger family with stron values. The states and governmet have gotten to powerfull and running over everyone. Whats good for the few governs the most and its not just the guns. Being a Veitnam veteran I have seen this happening since the 60s and it just gets worse so again I will support any one that will stand up against these unjust laws on guns and ammo. Sincerely
Alfred Weiss
Po Box 416
Moffat, Co 81143
weissman46@yahoo.com
Comment by Alfred Weiss — February 16, 2013 @ 8:01 am
Hooray!!! These companies and Cheaper Than Dirt should be lauded. C’mon down to Florida. Leave those states with unfair, restrictive laws behind. I will definitely patronize the companies that move to Florida!!!
Comment by PS — February 16, 2013 @ 8:01 am
I agree 100% with companies that are moving to friendlier locations. I also applaud & will support companies that are taking a stand against the government and their illegal actions. The Congress is always looking for a bad guy to deflect attention from important issues. Why else would they investigate steroids in baseball while fighting 2 wars and dealing with the beginnings a financial crisis. Congress has been handed their new bad guy and it will take the focus off of the fact that they are still a do-nothing-congress.
Comment by William Alexander — February 16, 2013 @ 8:01 am
I know it is difficult to move a business: been there, done that. But, if that move is based on obtaining growth and increased margins, then MOVE.
States like New York, California and Illinois are states which, in general, are anti-business. Their tax system, their regulation system and their buy-in to federal subsidies create a bad climate for a business to grow. If there is a bad business climate, then MOVE.
It is bad enough to deal with state taxes, regulations, and federal subsidies, but when a state targets a specific legal business because it does not agree with its product, then MOVE.
Comment by Don — February 16, 2013 @ 8:02 am
Ya’ll come on down to Georgia. The business climate is good, we are a right to work state and we love our guns.
I am impessed by these companies actions. I will be doing business with them.
Comment by Neil Cawley — February 16, 2013 @ 8:02 am
Move your business to North Carolina. We are a right to work state and welcome you with open arms to relocate to the “Tar Heel” state. We offer a community college system second to none to train your workers. We have beautiful beaches and mountains. Welcome home, we have it all and are waiting for you.
Comment by Steve — February 16, 2013 @ 8:03 am
I support all firearm and accessory suppliers who are pushing back at a government gone out of control. In light of the enormous purchases of ammo by alphabet gvmt agencies, supply has been affected for civilian use. All ammo producers should restrict purchases to all state, local and federal agencies that seek to undermine our gun rights. The civilian market for ammunition is obviously a larger market that is now being impacted.
Comment by Hal Thomas — February 16, 2013 @ 8:03 am
Every gun manufacturer in the U.S. should take this stance. Medals of commendation should be handed to those who blazed the trail. When the spawn of obumma is thought more higly of than the citizens that work to feed them, folks, we have a problem. I own many guns, of various makes and styles. They will be passed to my children, and their children after that. It makes no sense that a state will pass laws that take already starving communities and make them even more impoverished. I personnaly think it would be good to completely isolate those states. No food, except what they grow, no gas except what they can produce themselves or afford to ship from the countries whom they obviously love, and certainly no weapons of any kind. Not even a pocket knife. To all gun manufacturers and citizens who have taken this much needed step, and all soon to follow, I salute you!!!
Comment by Gerald Miller — February 16, 2013 @ 8:05 am
I agree 100%! Come to Georgia we luv our guns & we would luv to have anyone who supports this! These are the manuf I will look at for future purchases!
Comment by Terry Norris — February 16, 2013 @ 8:07 am
I truly support these companies in their decisions and if more would do this then we could get somewhere. The companies that are supplying the DHS in their stockpile are doing citizens wrong and don’t have a good image in the eye of consumers. I wish that the companies that operate in anti gun states would move to pro gun states. Can you imagine the impact it would have. Actually if one thinks about it, that in a way it is a violation of the constitution to supply the DHS like is being done without suppling citizens equally and our military. Our military is being shorted. Here in Oklahoma, we will except and promote any gun manufacture or distributor and I know texas is right there with us.
Comment by Daryl Miles — February 16, 2013 @ 8:11 am
It is my opinion that if the average citizen cannot have it or buy it then the storm trooper with badges should not be permitted them ether. Here in the state of Ohio we just had the Cleveland Police fire 137 shoots into a car with two unarmed people in it, killing both, one officer fired over 45 shoots. This was done with a high capacity mags using simi-Automatic weapons. If the say we don’t need them then thy don’t ether. So those companies that refuse to sell to Government and LE are doing their part and should be commended. A final note: in 1776 if the citizen did not have firearms equal to those of the British military, we would not be America, we would be governed by Britton.
Comment by Rev. Dr. R.H.Smith — February 16, 2013 @ 8:14 am
I applaud the firearms businesses that restrict their sales to government agencies/employees which are located in states that prohibit various areas of gun ownership. If any of them wish to relocate to Arizona, they will be welcomed with open arms. We, so far, have the most liberated attitude on guns and accessories of any state. We do have our doofusses who advocate gun control but they are by far in the minority here. I currently have products that are produced in gun unfriendly states but it is no longer an option to purchase those products unless the companies have taken a stand against sales to unfrindly gonernment entities.
Comment by Alex Glenn — February 16, 2013 @ 8:14 am
Why keep paying TAXES in these states that do not want you there. you will be welcome to TEXAS ya’ll come on down now LOVE FOR YOU TO MAKE THIS YOUR HOME
Comment by B BARRETT — February 16, 2013 @ 8:15 am
Thank you, CTD, for for supporting citizen 2A rights. We absolutely need mfgs. to join this effort. Especially the large volume mfgs. such as S&W, Ruger, Colt, Glock (yes, foreign mfgs. as well), etc. It will be very interesting to see which companies are willing to stand up for what is right vs. giving up the profits they make selling to New York and any other states that ban their products to the average citizen. As consumers, you and I can make a difference with our wallets. Please, please, please support those companies that are willing to take a loss to do what is right. And refuse to buy from those companies that are more interested in the dollar vs their values. For those that decide the dollar is more important, we need to make them feel that in the long run they will be hurt financially by not supporting our rights.
Comment by JB — February 16, 2013 @ 8:17 am
I say to all the firearms manufacturers and wholesalers in hostile states, come on dawn to Texas where y’all be greeted with open arms and affection…
Comment by Bob — February 16, 2013 @ 8:17 am
I also join the list in support of these companies. Oklahoma is very gun friendly and would love to have any and all of these companies relocate here. I to would like to see a list of companies that are stating policies of equal rights between the gov forces and citizenry in order to direct more of my business their way.
Comment by Ron Hakola — February 16, 2013 @ 8:17 am
I was shocked this past week to find out my Texas home city has made it illegal for anyone to carry on any FFL activities from a private home. This means that there can not even be “arms-length” internet sales or gunsmithing which do not even involve on-site retail sales!
I applaud the stand taken by these companies. However, I regret the possibility that some local law enforcement officers may find themselves “outgunned” by criminals simply because they were unable to easily procure what they need.
Having said that, I also want to state that, if one of these companies were to look at relocating to our state/county/city, I would support it whole-heartedly!
When thiinking about activism to support our 2nd Amendment rights, don’t forget to lobby your local Economic Development Corporation or similar entities. They are the ones who work with companies and politicians to create a climate that promotes business in your community.
Comment by Jack Foster — February 16, 2013 @ 8:19 am
I applaud these manufacturers standing up for the Second Amendment. My fear is that we have already passed the point of no return with our federal govt. I truly beleive that their intent is to provoke a civil war through constant erosion of our rights along with collapsing the economy through regulation and spending. These intentions were artfully hidden during the campaigns of 08 and 12 to ensure reelection. Now the real agenda is exposed for what it truly is, a neo communist/socialist/elitist state that has no use for small businesses or capitalism. I am well armed against the criminal element and I’m proficient with small arms, but my skills are no match for a drone carrying hell fire missles, driven by an anonymous government agent thousands of miles away in a reinforced bunker. Wake up, people. I
Comment by rob g — February 16, 2013 @ 8:19 am
Great! Made my day! Keep up thefight! We need ALL the gun manufacturers to get on board with this. Unfortunately, I live in Colorado where the legislatures are only listening to the anti-gunners. I am considering moving to a state where they still have their desire to stand up to all the fanatical antis.
Comment by Don Alderman — February 16, 2013 @ 8:20 am
as a resident of ny with 2nd resident in pa which you know from my orders from you [ stand by you 100% i have made up my mind to leave ny and live in pa as i still work in ny i will have to commute 5 hours aday but its better then living in a commie state i will make my money in ny but i will pay my taxes and spend money in pa god bless america and pa
Comment by brian — February 16, 2013 @ 8:21 am
From the Republic of Texas, these actions are held in high esteem. We welcome All firearms manufactures to our great Nation of Texas!
Comment by Matthew Jay — February 16, 2013 @ 8:21 am
I am not sure why any firearms manufacturer would want to remain in a gun hating state, where the laws are contrary to their business and the labor unions hate their company. Why not move to a state that loves the company and the products they produce. It only makes sense that a company would want to operate in a friendly environment.
Comment by Shawn Cook — February 16, 2013 @ 8:22 am
All NY, CA, and other firearms/related manufacturers: vote with you feet. take your people with you. While you still can………………..
Comment by Tree Dee — February 16, 2013 @ 8:24 am
I commend these companies for having a true understanding of what the second amendment stands for. I live in a gun friendly state and would welcome any firearms manufacturer with open arms.
Comment by Nate — February 16, 2013 @ 8:27 am
I live in Michigan. The sheriff here has made a statement in the local press and tv news that her swore to uphold the law and the constitution of the United States of America, and he sees the new gun legislation as unconstitutional and WILL NOT enforce it.From the people I know in lawenforcment, they tell me the even existing gun laws do nothing to stop gun violence by criminals. They didn’t work from 1994 to 2004 so why would these laws be any differant.
Comment by Bill W — February 16, 2013 @ 8:28 am
I fully support these moves and expect other companies will follow. However with CTD charging $59.99 and $79.99 for Magpul mags has me wondering if they are being true to their customers. This pricing is rape and is keeping many gun owners from acquiring Pmags for present and future use, I expected better from CTD.
Comment by David W — February 16, 2013 @ 8:29 am
I fully support all the gun companies and the new statements they have made. When I read my Cheaper Than D
Comment by Gregg — February 16, 2013 @ 8:29 am
I think it is great that those companies have chosen not to sell products to govt agencies… At least someone understands how strongly we feel about the 2nd Amendment… I would like to see the other companies follow suit … I would deffinately purchase product from companies who have chosen to relocate to more gun friendly states … These times are very trying and we must be prepared to make changes in order to show the people who we voted in to office , what it is that we “THE PEOPLE” are expecting from them … I for one expect them to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America and the 2nd Amendment that reads … “THE PEOPLES” Right to Keep and Bear Arms “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON”…
just so we are clear … it reads SHALL NOT … not PLEASE DONT … I hope that the men and women we voted into public office have the courage to stand up and fight for us “THE PEOPLE” in this battle against gun control …
Comment by Jason White — February 16, 2013 @ 8:31 am
I highly respect any gun or accessories manufacturer that takes a stand for the 2nd amendment and refuses to cooperate with any assertion by local, State or federal government that puts it’s employees rights above those of the average citizen. Good job guys!
Comment by Ernie Davidson — February 16, 2013 @ 8:32 am
I fully support all of these companies. I live in Colorado and right now the law-makers here are right on the cusp of passing legislation that mirrors New York and California gun laws. MagPul is here and has stated that they will be forced to move if these laws are enacted. The economic fall-out of such legislation is a looming disaster all over this nation, not to mention the direct infringement on the Second Amendment rights of law abiding people. Our country is falling apart at the hands of a tyranical Democratic run government!
Comment by Leland Pierce — February 16, 2013 @ 8:35 am
I have to say im so VERY proud of these companies who STAND the common peoples rights & that they do NOT put government, or gov. officials over the COMMON PERSON. My hats off to ALL you. You will be remembered & MY BUSINESS go to you in support of what you are doing. WE THE PEOPLE—thank you.
talkercalls.com
Comment by David McFarland — February 16, 2013 @ 8:36 am
I commend these company’s and support there endeavors, I live in Massachusetts, which is a neo-communist state. I would love for some pro gun support to come our way. Originally being from Wisconsin which is a pro gun state, I would like to see some of the New England firearms company’s move there to do business!!
Comment by Jason z — February 16, 2013 @ 8:37 am
I live in NY. I applaud the sentiment, but I can see the govt. either taking over a manufacturer if they so desire, or just going overseas. If the govt can declare eminent domain over your personally owned land and steal it from you without payment, what’s to stop them from stealing the land, and factory built upon it for “emergency needs”??!!?? Also, there are currently-friendly countries such as Italy, Germany, Israel, Belgium, Switzerland and others who might step up (or step down) to make US Govt. sales. So, although a good idea in mind, I wonder how it would actually pan out in deed.
As an asides… and off topic…late last year(before any of this all started), I sent 3 emails to two different addresses at Larue Tactical (using their own links), requesting info on a potential future purchase. They never responded to any of them. Although I laud their statement of defiance, I refuse to purchase from a company that won’t even acknowledge a customer. If they don’t care about answering queries, how much more will they care if you have an issue with one of their items after the sale? I learned that lesson after purchasing a firearm made by MGI. They too don’t answer email or phone calls for that matter( please leave a message…we won’t answer it, but please leave it anyway). My MGI firearm, wont need to be registered, because if it doesnt shoot, then is it a firearm?
Comment by Andy — February 16, 2013 @ 8:38 am
I applaud the companies that are taking a Pro 2nd Amendment stance and fighting back. Shame on those who don’t. I will not support those companies that cower away and do nothing. I live in Northeast Mississippi and our state and local governments are 100% Pro 2nd Amendment rights and pro-gun. We would welcome and completely support any company that wishes to leave any anti-gun state and relocate here. We are already home to one Winchester ammunition plant and we also have very hard working, dedicated, God fearing people here in Mississippi. We intend to fight til the end to protect our constitutional & God given rights if need be. We keep pro 2nd Amendment rights leaders in office here in Mississippi and vote out speedily the ones who are not up to par. We are NRA supporting, gun toting, Bible clinging Americans that believe in God, Family & Country (in that order), and the overwhelming majority of us believe it’s high time that we take our country back from the liberal, politically correct blowhards that are now running our country into the ground faster than the 33,000 mph that the meteor in Russia was traveling when it entered the Earths atmosphere. God Bless Y’all.
Comment by Joseph Griffin — February 16, 2013 @ 8:38 am
It is great to see these companies push back, if any need to relocate, South Carolina is a Right To Work State with a Republican Governor, Concealed Carry is legal,and a strong support for our Second Amendment.
Comment by Ron Seigler — February 16, 2013 @ 8:38 am
I agree, including no sales to the feds. If DHS was not hoarding millions of rounds maybe there would be ammo available for the public again. I am sure the loss in sales to govt agencies would be made up for by civilian sales, and the suppliers would get getter prices from the public and have less govt red tape to deal with.
Comment by Joe — February 16, 2013 @ 8:39 am
I fully support all the plans of the gun/gun accessory manufacturers. It warmed my heart to read about them making a difference. This should send a much louder message to the gun grabbers than just my phone call to the Governor!
The Second Ammendment said nothing about hunting. ONLY THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS !!!!!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
Comment by Gregg — February 16, 2013 @ 8:39 am
Hat’s off to the few gun companies for fighting back. The current administration along with the liberals in both houses of congress seems to love the unions, for example, the Teachers union, United Autoworkers union and the Teamsters union. Politicians love them because of their powerful fundraising and lobbying efforts.
Perhaps if all gun manufactures join together like the unions, the shear power in numbers and the resulting political power will force government to reverse this dangerous course. If government is unable to purchase and restock from our own US suppliers, it will be forced to look elsewhere. This will be a big problem, since they are going through with the international arms treaty, and they would be breaking their own law.
Other powerful means to the end are right out of the liberal playbook such as;
1. Forcing a recall vote of politicians in states such as New York, (this is very costly for the incumbent)
2. Class action law suites, based on unconstitutional new laws.
3. Commercials and even movies illustrating the dangers of an unarmed public. (get in their heads like the libs do)
4. Sensationalizing every lawful, self-defense gun incident, just as the major media does with criminal shootings.
5. Broader publication of the true sentiments of law enforcement against the gun bans, and supporting those LE officials who do speak up. (make it the norm, not the exception).
Let us be as well armed with intellect as with guns.
Comment by Steve — February 16, 2013 @ 8:40 am
I understand the sentiment behind this decision but in a way I feel it is short sighted. Most Law Enforcement agencies in this country are small less than 10 sworn officers) and do not furnish weapons to their officers and if they do options such as patrol carbines are the purchase resposibility of the individual officer who carries them. So by doing this that hampers and potentially could endanger the officer in trying to do his or her job in protecting you and themselves as they execute their duties. Individual officers and agencies do not write state law and I dare say most stay out of the political fray completely or totally disagree with the current anti-gun trend. If folks think that local law enforcement are going to go around knocking on your door and seizing you magazines and rifles if it comes to that I think your mistaken. I agree that businesses have the right to do business with whom they choose but disagree with a decision to not supply state / local law enforcement. Google the video of the LA Bank Robber shootout from about 15 years ago and see why. I hope they reconsider individual officer purchases. Folks like LaRue sure haven’t ever had a hard time taking hard earned individual officers money before.
Comment by Doc Dean — February 16, 2013 @ 8:40 am
Move to Virginia, we are ones that house the beginning of this Great Nation plenty of the original working/sporting people want to work furthering our Right. Great what these companies are doing. Continue.
Comment by Oliver wood — February 16, 2013 @ 8:42 am
Way to go guys I am sick and tired of American citizens being punished because are liberal government is trying a knee jerk reaction to a mad man that steals a gun. I live in kentucky and are state government is as well trying the same stuff. Thank job it is only a small few it’s funny to me are federal government is talking about jobs but at the same time these ediots are trying to put hard working people that work at these company’s out of work and put these company’s out of business I wish that all of these gun company’s would do the same. I support all company’s that refuse sale to the government and LE agency’s because if I can’t have it why should they. If we stand together we can put the breaks on congress and we hired them and we can fire them. I would like to see all pro gun states repeal any federal law that restricts gun rights to LAW ABIDING CITIZENS and make a example out of people that break the laws that are on the books. Let’s put these anti gun liberals out of office once and for all and make them regret ever hitting the button to restrict are gun rights just like we did after the gun ban in the 90s and let them know if they intend on changing the constitution they can move to a country that has no constitution or bill of rights.
Comment by Bengie howard — February 16, 2013 @ 8:43 am
I agree and admire the stance that these companies are taking. It is a brilliant idea, and I truly hope that more companies follow thier lead.
Comment by Edward — February 16, 2013 @ 8:46 am
I fully support companies which are doing this. I also think that the ammo manufacturers should take on the same attitude. Selling ammo in equal amounts to citizens first and then to States and especially the government. Not selling a BILLION rounds to the government!!!! This sounds like a side agenda if they cannot take your guns then they will take ammo. Also, I am sure that Texas will take any manufactures jobs and money (Henry, Remington, and others) with open arms.
Comment by RWC — February 16, 2013 @ 8:46 am
The House of Representatives in the State of Missouri has recently introduced legislation that will make all semi-automatic weapons illegal. If passed this will give legal gun owners 90 days to surrender their arms. If they fail to do so, they will be labled fellons, and homes are subject to search and siezure. As one of my friends put it, “I hope it passes. Let the revolution begin here and now.” This guy is not some low life or nerdowell. He is an executive and has directed national sales teams. This crosses all socio political bounds. Democrats and Conservatives alike had better wake up and smell the coffee. We owe this to the sacrafice of all of the veterans from past to present that have ever worn a uniform, to not stand by and allow our Constitutional Inallinable (God Given), rights to be taken from us. The spirit of the blood that flowed through their veins, flows through mine. “The United States is a Country Born of War, and Baptized in the Blood of Patriots!” Don’t Tread on Me!
Comment by Stan Clement — February 16, 2013 @ 8:47 am
Wow, awesome. I hope this gains momentum. Please send these comments to all the companies that are not yet taking the same stand. If we said we would only support those companies that support this move to protect gun rights, maybe others would join in. They will lose revenue in the short run, but gain in the long run. Or if they don’t stand in support now, noone will be able to buy from them eventually anyway. While others slammed CTD when they regrouped to see if they were following the laws, and halted sales temporarily, I stood by and observed…now those people should thank CTD for taking this stand against selling to LEA that are in gun ban states. Judging by the ammo shortage of practically all calibers, I suspect everyone is gearing up for the time when government doesn’t allow sales of ammo to civilians. I can see it coming…then what good are guns without ammo? I understand the frustration of parents who have lost loved ones to gun violence, but it won’t stop criminals from continuing violent acts if they take guns out of hands of law abiding citizens.
Comment by Ed — February 16, 2013 @ 8:47 am
I do believe its each companies right to do business with whom every they wish. That said I personally can’t see any good reason why anyone would not support there decision to help us protect our rights. Also do realize the business are already getting squeezed out of income and choosing to further forfeit income by not selling to government and law enforcement is a statement that we as gun owners respect and support. I do believe if the state said business are in want to stop them from doing there regular business they should move where they can continue doing regular business.
Comment by Dan proud gun owner — February 16, 2013 @ 8:48 am
For those companys that want to move please contact the State of Oklahoma We would love to have you move here and hire our workers just for the thought we are in the center of the states main highways, railroads and good work force I could promise you
you would be welcome
Comment by A Schofield — February 16, 2013 @ 8:50 am
This recent gun grab spits in the face of all who have ever fought for our freadoms! I fully support all gun and gear manufacturers to boycott goverment sales. If law abiding citizens can’t own it then neither should the government. We are the Nation. Our government is here to serve US not just themselves. All weapons and gear manufacturers should boycott all sales to any government agency. We need Colt, Springfeild and all other manufacturers that have large scale contracts to cancel any orders for government agencys. It’s time to send a clear message. If We the People can’t have it you The Government can’t have it either. God bless America and her citizens!
Comment by Ryan Grant — February 16, 2013 @ 8:50 am
Many thanks to the gun industry for taking such a stand. After all the sane and common sense people leave states like CA and NY, we’ll see just how stupid these two state’s legislators really are. Just think how much safer the gun toting states will be when most of the criminals move to CA and NY for easier picking.
Comment by gapatriot — February 16, 2013 @ 8:50 am
I have to say, it is companies like these that make me proud to be an American again. I have had little reason to be so proud as of late. I will support and post on both out website and facebook this amazing movement and ask everyone I know to support these companies with their business.
Comment by Anthony Barone — February 16, 2013 @ 8:53 am
You bet I support these companies decisions. Yall come on down here to Texas we would be glad to have you. We would also make your business grow since most of us love to shoot and have our right to own as many guns as we can. See you here.
Comment by Wayman Morrow — February 16, 2013 @ 8:59 am
There is one element of government’s feverish to pass draconian gun laws that isn’t being discussed. The firearms industry is one of the only profitable enterprises remaining in this country. It must be destroyed, if only to prove that Capitalism doesn’t work.
Comment by 2WarAbnVet — February 16, 2013 @ 9:00 am
one thing that is not talked about,the gov buying up all the ammo(HOMELAND SECURITY)a billion rounds is nothing to them because they dont pay for it. they can have the FED print more fiat money that they blow on any thing they want. why isnt FEDERAL,WINCHESTER,HORNADY,REMMINGTON restricting sales to H.S,F.B.I,A.T.F, that are intended to dry up the market place. are they blind to this or just GREEDY!!!!
Comment by jeff carlson — February 16, 2013 @ 9:01 am
A big thumbs up for companies taking these actions. They should go one step further. They should suspend all sales to all Govn’t and LEO agencies period. Get the message across loud and clear. Until this attack on our 2nd Amendment is stopped we will not support the government.
Comment by Brad Alexander — February 16, 2013 @ 9:01 am
I totally agree with Greg Miller’s post from this morning. We welcome them all in Tennessee. God Bless America.
Comment by Lawrence Stevens — February 16, 2013 @ 9:02 am
Manufacturers should come to San Antonio. Right to work state, easy standard of living, and home of the Alamo a plus. Will sponsor families that make the move with you. Enchilada and brisket plates for all. Come on down.
Comment by Dustin — February 16, 2013 @ 9:04 am
They would be welcome in Lousiana, which has some of the most gun friendly laws in the country.
Comment by Richard — February 16, 2013 @ 9:04 am
What’s good for the goose(us) is good for the Gander(Gov B****es). Our great nation is so focused on being Politically Correct, making sure everyone is treated equally, then let is all be equal!! The fact that the LAPD officers shot 40+ holes in the wrong color and make of vehicle shows that they (LE) are, by and large, LESS responsible gun owners than the general American public!!!
My future purchases will surely be effected by the individual stores policies toward LE/Public equality!!! Thanks for the 411!!!!
Comment by Clint Wood — February 16, 2013 @ 9:05 am
I for one realize that this action is going to cost manufacturers and retailers money. You are doing the right thing, not only to protect your market but also to protect the Country. Count on this – those firms that are stepping up and not selling to Government will get my business in the future. I hope other Citizens will do the same.
Bravo, Patriots.
Comment by Anthony — February 16, 2013 @ 9:07 am
Isn’t it great how Liberals always seem to know more than anyone else about everything? How would we ever survive on our own?
Comment by Mikial — February 16, 2013 @ 9:07 am
From behind the iron curtain in Californistan, a heartfelt thanks to the management teams of those companies (Larue, Olympic, CheaperTD,et al)for supporting American Citizens. As noted by others, ammo mfg & suppliers and all related need to take the same position. These State-level 2nd Amendment assaults are being coordinated and cheered by the White House. (Biden reportedly calling Dems in CO on their votes) Any remaining manufacturers in California I would encourage you to leave asap. Why? Because you will go out of business if you stay and your business is too important to the country. So relocate asap. Difficult as it is, time to start. Move your HQ offices, open a second plant, begin production there, then shift it all–pulling all taxes out of the hostile State immediately. And depart loudly, publish the jobs lost, taxes lost, etc and cite the culprits for the nation to see. As for me, don’t worry. I don’t have a manufacturing plant to relocate or hundreds/thousands of employees to worry about. I can pick up pretty quickly and change State residency–pulling out my income taxes as I close the door behind me.
God Bless
Comment by Mark — February 16, 2013 @ 9:08 am
It’s about time! I fully support all gun makers and ammo suppliers! At time now, I even buy ammo to guns I don’t have!
I say if the government is going to ban it from citizens, then the companies need to stop selling to ANY agency of law. Not just in those cities and states, because the LE will just buy it from another state. Keep them from accessing it at all cost!
I’m a law abiding citizen, if the laws changed here in Missouri, then I want the cops and Feds to follow suit. And for Missouri, vote NO on house bill 545. This bans all guns over 10 rounds and semi auto rifled! And there’s no grandfather claus!
Comment by Jermaine — February 16, 2013 @ 9:09 am
I live in Illinois and, should our Governor and certain members of our state legislature have their way, I fully expect to see the gun manufacturers in my state to leave. I also fully expect to see the state of Illinois up for sale on eBay at any time since the morons currently running things are completelt clueless on how to restore the state’s economic health.
Comment by Joseph Volpendesta — February 16, 2013 @ 9:09 am
I agree and feel most Nebraska residents would welcome any firearms, ammo or parts manufacturer. Plenty of room and citizens who would embrace these industries. I will definately go out of my way to purchase from companies and producers who are making a stand. Thank you. God bless America
Comment by Cortney — February 16, 2013 @ 9:10 am
I am absolutely behind each of the stand up gun and ammo companies fighting back. Many many citizen around me think like wise. Many of these are NON gun owners. All of together can recenter this imbalance of thinking.
Comment by Dr. Ben w Laverty III — February 16, 2013 @ 9:11 am
I support these companies and would welcome their decision to move to Texas. I have written to the Governor of Texas suggesting that he contact gun and parts manufactures in California, Colorado and New York to see what can be done to move them to Texas. If you live in Texas contact the governor and let him know you support this idea.
Comment by C Wells — February 16, 2013 @ 9:13 am
I’ve been a cop for 22 years. I applaud any gun company that stands up to government organizations that want to ban the Citizen’s right to Keep and Bear Arms.
Comment by EdH — February 16, 2013 @ 9:13 am
I absolutely support these companies’ decisions and urge other companies to follow suit. No guns for citizens, no guns for the state.
However, I find it a bit hypocritical for Cheaper Than Dirt to praise these moves, when CTD itself will not ship handguns into Maryland that are legally allowed in the state. Perhaps CTD should practice what it preaches and start allowing Maryland citizens to buy legal handguns from their website.
Comment by Cliff — February 16, 2013 @ 9:14 am
I Fully Support The Manufacturers Right, To Ban The Sale Of There Products To Law Enforcement. In States That Ban The Sale Of There Products, To There Law Abiding Citizens. If They Think It Is Not Safe For Law Abiding Citizens, Than It Is Not Safe For Law Enforcement. After All Law Enforcement Is Made Up Of Citizens. All People Deserve The Same Rights. No One Life Is More Important Than Another. We All Have Family, That Depend On Us. You Can Not Let The Actions Of A Criminal, Restrict The Rights Of The Law Abiding Citizens. This Is A Good First Step. But The People Need To Step Up To. The Gun Banners Are On The Move. And They Will Never Be Happy Till All Guns Are Banned. Then Only The Criminals Will Have Them. Criminals Love Gun Banners.
Comment by Ed McDonold — February 16, 2013 @ 9:15 am
Every gun manufacturer, Ammunition manufacturer, guns smith in the U.S. should take this stance and refuse to do any business with any state or Federal government law enforcement agency unless that government agency publicly denounce and state that they will not adhere to Dian Feinstein and the Obama Administration tyrannical demands of neutering the 2nd amendment in any shape way or form in writing.
Comment by Anthony — February 16, 2013 @ 9:18 am
I would love to have various gun manufacturers move to more friendly states but the realities of making this happen may prove challenging. I’m sure the owners of these companies are concerned with the well-being of their employees and would think twice before relocating. With pending legislation that may outlaw some of their product, going through the cost of a move may not be wise (though I suspect that none of the bans will pass). Also, there is a certain logic to stay in these states and fight the political hacks that would limit the 2nd Amendment rights of their citizens. I fully support with my wallet companies such as Larue and CTD that will not sell unless the product is legal in the related jurisdiction. All this non-sense about banning “assault weapons” and high capacity magazines is really unbelievable. I believe the anti-gun crowd knows that it will have no real affect on gun violence which in turn makes me believe it is only a piece of a broader gun control agenda.
Comment by Dave Y. — February 16, 2013 @ 9:18 am
We are so thankful and appreciative to these companies who are willing to stand up and do the right thing. We highly encourage all gun related manufacturing companies to follow their example. We will support you! There is power in numbers. I have written my congressman and senators, but they are only one vote. We need a larger commitment which we can support to send our message loud and clear to a government who is determined to forcefully take away our rights as citizens of the United States. Our country needs PATRIOTS to protect Her. For these companies to be willing to risk everything to do what is right is refreshing and we will definitely be supportive of you. This is the first I have read of this movement. This needs to be more publicized. Come on down to Alabama!!
Comment by Jackie Joiner — February 16, 2013 @ 9:19 am
Absolutely I support these manufacturers and businesses. I would love for them to move to my area and continue operations. Heck, I’d volunteer my time to help them if I could.I’m proud of all of them.
Comment by Scott — February 16, 2013 @ 9:19 am
The proposed MA laws are onerous. The worst of which will end the sales of new magazine fed firearms. No manufacturer will build a MA specific product, a magazine that cannot be converted to hold more than seven rounds, or a firearm that will accomodate one. I’m on my way out. Don’t know why a manufacturer would stay where it wasn’t welcome.
A few years ago an old line manufacturer in Gardner was forced out of business. The equipment was purchased, shipped south and is now being used to build guns out of state. The politicians celebrated the loss of over a hundred jobs. The loss of S&W might get their attention.
Comment by jib quinn — February 16, 2013 @ 9:20 am
I hope all other gun, ammo, and accessory outfits all do the same thing. Maine welcomes any gun or ammo manufacturer to set up shop. We are open for business! Look to Wiscasset, Maine. Lot’s of land in the mid coast area and easy shipping, it’s a great community that wants your business.
Comment by Rick — February 16, 2013 @ 9:24 am
I also fully support the decision of the named companies and hope all the manufacturers of firearms and accessories follow suit. Might I suggest an additional tactic we, as hunters and sport shooters, can do? How about we boycott any and all hunting in the states that threaten our 2nd Amendment rights? I live in Minnesota and the revenue generated by the hunters and shooters in the state adds a lot of money to the state coffers. We pay sales taxes on our equipment, we buy gasoline for our trips which generates more taxes for the state, we spend our money for food and lodging and we buy licenses. We have 500,000 deer hunters in the state and loss of all that revenue would be something the legislature would understand. Yes, it would cost jobs at the DNR, yes, some programs might have to be shut down but we ARE talking about the state abusing OUR 2nd Amendment rights for no good reason. We know that laws only work for those who obey them. Punishing law-abiding gun owners because of a very few tragic incidents involving insane people is not going to solve the problem. The above is just an idea that may have some merit. Maybe we can hunt in another state or maybe we have to declare a moritorium on our hunting for a short period. Governments understand revenue loss. Just the threat of the loss of millions of dollars might be enough to get them to readjust their thinking. BTW, About three years ago, the Minnesota legislature made .22 caliber center-fire rifles legal for deer hunting with no specification of rifle type. Accordingly, with that change, the State of Minnesota recognizes the .223 AR as a legal hunting rifle, not just a “weapon of war”. I believe it is a legal hunting rifle in several other states as well.
Comment by Jim Kelly — February 16, 2013 @ 9:24 am
I commend all these companies for standing up against the governments that always think they are above the citizens of this country. Come on down to Texas and make yourself at home. Here in Texas we and our government supports the 2nd amendment
and we would welcome and support companies who do the same. I have printed these articles and plan to support these companies firt when I am in the market for their products. I am proud to be among the supporters of the American Consitution.
Comment by Charles Crittenden — February 16, 2013 @ 9:24 am
I support all the companies that are putting up a fight against the left wing agenda of gun control. I think Cheaper Than Dirt and other supporters should publish lists of those companies that support this new wave of gun control. This is the only way, us as individuals, can vote with our purchasing dollars. If it were widely known which companies support the left on this issue, the consumers could hurt their bottom line as we did with Chaves’s oil sales in the US.
We need to know what companies support the gun control agenda.
Comment by Richard — February 16, 2013 @ 9:26 am
I absolutely support the companies taking this action. I think all companies should take this action.
Comment by Jeff Egan — February 16, 2013 @ 9:27 am
I wholeheartedly support these companies. I am a FFL holder and will support those companies that take a stand. We the people dictate to the government not the government to the people.
Show em with your dollars!! I know I will and will ask every customer I have to do the same. We will support you with our dollars!!
God bless America.
Comment by S.Aldridge — February 16, 2013 @ 9:28 am
I fully support and stand with ALL firearms manufacturers. I am in the State of Ohio, and I bombard my representatives and Governor with requests on a semi-daily basis, to uphold the Oath of Office they took. when Ohio becomes citizen friendly, I hope any manufacturers that will move, please move here.
We need the work, and have quality workers for you!
I will only spend my money on Companies that support those of us as “WE the people”.
Sincerely,
Jerry McMains
Comment by Jerry McMains — February 16, 2013 @ 9:29 am
I live in the People’s Republic of California, where we have the communist dictator Diane Feinstein. She is the architec of all these unconstitutinal laws. Unfortunately, the CA legislature is now has a super-majority of members of the Democrat Communist Party. They are currently passing more anti-gun laws to ban the purchase of ammo online, limit the amount of ammo we can buy, and force us to get a license to buy ammo. This must be stopped. This is unconstitutional, and they don’t care. All the guna and ammo companies must boycot the state of CA to force CA to change their stance on gun and ammo control. Just think about it….if you didn’t have any ammo, and you wanted to buy some at the store, but you could only buy 50 rounds per month, how long do you think that ammo will last? How does this not “infringe our right to keep and bear arms?”
Comment by Kevin Keesler — February 16, 2013 @ 9:32 am
AWESOME JOB I TOTALLY AGREE WITH LA RUE AND DIRT CHEAP AND OTHER COMPANIES I HAVE BEEN EMAILING ALL FIREARM COMPANIES URGING THEM TO DO THE SAME. THIS THE U.S.A. NOT A SOCIALIST COUNTRY. LETS TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK FROM THESE GUN GRABBING CAREER POLITICIANS. ALL FIREARMS COMPANIES ARE WELCOME IN MISSOURI WE NEED THE JOBS
Comment by Tom (missouri) — February 16, 2013 @ 9:33 am
I fully support the decisions of these companies and will spend my money with them. expanding on that, i will not purchase from a company that does not follow these companies in there efforts. I think ALL companies that manufacture gun parts, firearms,ammunition, brass, bullets Etc. should follow suit and sell nothing to these states that don’t allow citizens to own the same. I am sure that Arizona would support those manufacturers and accept them with open arms, as we already have many gun parts, accessory and ammo manufacturers already.
Comment by rocker46 — February 16, 2013 @ 9:35 am
Chicago has the strictest gun laws in the country ,no guns period and the highest murder rate in the nation.Obama,Cuomo know stricter gun laws do not stop murder,Chicago is the proven fact,this is not about stopping murder this is about total control Obama wants to be our first DICTATOR.We need to impeach before we lose all our rights that our forefathers fought for, we need to uphold the Constitution and Bill of Rights at all cost
Comment by Roland Salisburg — February 16, 2013 @ 9:35 am
This is a clear sign that we now must, as a free America, stand behind the companies and people that make up the workforce of that company.And, for the companies that decide to bow to the laws enacted by the Federal Gov ‘t, or adopt their unconstitutional laws, maybe we can with hold our purchases. We are well aware that in America, money talks, and everything else walks. PLEASE FORWARD THESE LETTERS.!
Comment by Russell — February 16, 2013 @ 9:35 am
I applaud any mannufacturer,distributar,re-seller, that has the fortitude to stand up to tyranny. 4 Months ago, I owned a 22 semi automatic hand gun, A friend suggested I take a concel carry class. That is when my eyes were opened. Otherwise I was another lamb being led to slaughter. I now own 2 12 Ga shot guns,2 9mm semi auto hand guns, 9 mm carbine, !R 15, 22 tactical rifle, and enough ammo to survive. We need to form strong community,I think this is going to get worse before it get better.
John
Comment by John — February 16, 2013 @ 9:38 am
I totally agree with companies that refuse to sell or service their products to any gov. agency that restricts the same rights from it’s citizens.
I would go further identify the brand of guns these depts. have, and no longer honor any warranty repairs or replacement parts to them, until any restrictions of the same is made to it’s citizens.
Comment by uncle knife — February 16, 2013 @ 9:38 am
Come to Florida! Kel-Tec has done quite well here. I left the state of California 22 years ago because I found the state government to be run by incompetent, moronic, hypocritical imbeciles. I have found that Florida offers what I like about California with the distinct absence of those things I dislike (with the exception of some counties in central/southern Florida). Ammunition manufacturers should definitely follow suit and not sell to agencies that restrict, ban or support the restriction or banning of ammunition to citizens as well.
Comment by D. Robbins — February 16, 2013 @ 9:40 am
Add my name to all those supporting these companies restricting sales to oppressive government agencies. I also welcome these companies to relocate to Texas for a 2nd Amendment friendly business environment. The Republic of Texas is alive and well.
Comment by Tom D — February 16, 2013 @ 9:41 am
Well done! I applaud your effort to cease doing business with government entities who limit what the public can buy, but find themselves exempt from the very same laws that trample 2nd amend rights of it’s citizens. The governments need to be held accountable for their actions.
Unfortunately, I live in NJ. No firearm-related company owner, in their right mind, would want to relocate their manufacturing and distribution here, since the laws are some of the most intrusive in the country.
Stand and fight!
Comment by Andrew Auletta — February 16, 2013 @ 9:42 am
Amen Brother. I like the Open Arms portion of the comment too.
Comment by Stan Clement — February 16, 2013 @ 9:43 am
I believe that what they are doing is the right thing to do. If a civilan can not own one why should the le be able too. Some of the Northern states over reactin, this country was built on God and Mans right to have fire arms and to try and take that away from us is wrong. Our country is going so far away from what God did for us, we are going to end up like the Isrealites lost and with out a country.
Comment by Bikermarine — February 16, 2013 @ 9:44 am
Oklahoma is gun friendly. Move your business here. I suggest that all manufacturers refuse to do business with any other business that does business with anti second amendment state/local governments.
Comment by doug — February 16, 2013 @ 9:46 am
This is an extremely courageous move by these companies, knowing these actions have a direct impact on their bottom line. The misguided, emotional agenda of many of our elected officials stands to do nothing towards curbing crime and the illegal use of firearms. We know the community of legal gun owners and sportsmen and women. Law abiding, logical thinking people who take the responsibility of gun ownership seriously. To infringe on the rights of millions in the hopes of deterring the actions of a few seems to be the definition of insanity and the direct opposite actions that a free democracy would take. I will absolutely support these companies who are on the forefront of this battle. Teaxas may become overpopulated if other state legislatures continue to levy unconstitutional bans on the lawful citizens of their states.
Comment by RPG — February 16, 2013 @ 9:47 am
I support the actions of these companies to move and not to sell to those who would not support the Constitution. Whether it be a Federal, State, or Local government. Also let us not forget the actions of CTD when they pulled their gun sales and the so called supply and demand prices they have imposed on products. There are still better companies than CTD that still receive stock and sell at or below MSRP even in this time of supply an demand. CTD just seems to be another Profit hungry BIG Business instead of a Second Amendment supporter.
Comment by John — February 16, 2013 @ 9:47 am
Yes, I absolutely support private individuals and companies right to do business with who they choose.
People’s Republic of Kalifornia
Comment by bfw — February 16, 2013 @ 9:48 am
Mandatory registration of citizen’s owned GUN’S will not resolve the high insidents of GUNS related crimes. Since 1952 Puerto Rico USA has had in effect very strict laws regarding the purchase and ownership off GUNS & AMMUNITIONS. At the time of purchase all GUNS & AMMUNNITIOS are inmediately register with the POLICE DEPARTMENT TRHU A COMPUTER SYSTEM. Puerto Rico’s
GUN’S related crime rate increases every year. Criminals always fine a way to beat the system
by purchasing their GUNS in the BLACK MARKET.
Comment by David Bernard Mendez — February 16, 2013 @ 9:49 am
Excellent idea. Great thinking just hope many more will come onboard. Fight fire with fire. Now if the ammo mfg’s would follow and do the same.
Comment by roger payne — February 16, 2013 @ 9:54 am
This is fantastic news. Leave it to the real patriots in the firearms industry to come up with a sensible solution to Uncle Sam’s attempt at tyranny. Governmental hypocrisy should never be tollerated. The whole purpose of the 2nd ammendment is to level the playing field between the people and the government. The firearms industry is doing the right thing by “leveling the playing field between the people and the government”. James Madison clearly laid out the spirit of the law regarding the 2nd ammendment in Federalist Paper #46. His words need to be in the news at a time like this. I strongly recommend taking the few minutes of time it takes to read Federalist Paper #46. God Bless the firearms industry.
Comment by James Gaul — February 16, 2013 @ 9:54 am
I completely support the action of those companies who are doing this. Hopefuly ALL of the gun industry will follow.
Comment by Bill Doyle — February 16, 2013 @ 9:55 am
I applaud those gun companies that have taken such a bold move to not only stop selling guns to law enforcement but to also move their operations. I’m in agreement with most that have already posted that I will support those companies with my future purchases and other companies should also consider doing what these companies have started. Stand united!
Comment by Terry Matsunaga — February 16, 2013 @ 9:57 am
I fully support the policy adopted by Olympic and others. Include the ammo manufacturers and it will be a hat trick.
BTW, Idaho is very gun friendly and shouldn’t be forgotten for states to relocate to.
Comment by Carl Yee — February 16, 2013 @ 9:57 am
I support your decisions, if I could afford your guns, I would buy them, I hope you all can move to better states and get blessed for your decision. Fair is fair, and right is right.
Comment by Cat — February 16, 2013 @ 9:58 am
I think think this is a brilliant move and I applaud and support it! If the big boys, like Glock, S&W, Colt, Federal, etc… were to join in, I think we might really get some leverage on the politicians. I will monitor this and it will influence my buying decisions.
I live in GA and would love to have more manufacturing jobs located here. Please, bring it on!
Comment by Deanocraft — February 16, 2013 @ 9:58 am
I think this is an exceptional strategy. I would love to see all weapons manufacturers/dealers, ammo manufacturers/dealers, and gun accessory manufacturers/dealers adopt the strategy to sell to LE/gov only those items that can also be sold to private individuals in their jurisdiction. But I would like to propose we, as gun owners and buyers, go one step further. We should all contact our favorite gun/ammo/accessory companies and request they adopt this policy. I hesitate to suggest we stop doing business with those companies that don’t adopt the policy because that would just hurt their business. However, I do think we can suggest to them that, when we are evaluating competing products for purchase, the company’s stance w.r.t. this policy would be a contributing factor. If enough of us were willing to do this, I think we can create true enough pressure to change the policies in many places. Personally, if I can find the information to let me do so, I plan to adopt this strategy for my own purchases. I encourage others to do the same.
Comment by RonLand — February 16, 2013 @ 9:59 am
I fully support the decisions of all these gun and accessory manufactors! In fact, Louisiana would welcome any of these companies to relocate down here. Our Speaker of the House, earlier this week, committed to defend our right to protect our family. We have plenty of “Southern Hospitality” waiting for any “unwanted and unappreciated” firearm, ammo, or accessory manufactors .
Comment by Allen Whittington — February 16, 2013 @ 10:00 am
I absolutely support these companies, not only in policy, but more importantly with my money!
Companies looking to relocate for a more friendlier business atmosphere, might I recommend moving to Florida. Where not only do we love our firearms, but have a Governor (R. Scott) and State Attorney (P. Biondi) who are fighting hard for our 2nd Ammendment freedoms, and working hard to make things easier for all companies to relocate here.
Comment by charlie R. — February 16, 2013 @ 10:00 am
I fully support companies that will not sell to government stat and fed, if they can not sell to citizens as well, and i feel that they should move their operations to states that are more firearm friendly, and move those jobs there. stop all work in states like california, Ill. New york, and other liberal states and move to states that are more firearms freindly.
Comment by ira polson — February 16, 2013 @ 10:01 am
It is like the old saying, whst is good for the goose is good for the gander.
When all of the agencies start having problems getting the supplies, ammo, and
parts that they need, they will realize what they are doing to the common man.
Comment by william Ake — February 16, 2013 @ 10:04 am
Democrats lost the first Civil War because the arms makers weren’t in the areas they controlled. Time for history to repeat itself.
Comment by SDN — February 16, 2013 @ 10:05 am
Agree, that is basis for our 2nd Amendment Rights: Law abiding citizens having access to equal Arms as government agencies.
Comment by David Baldinger — February 16, 2013 @ 10:08 am
As so eloguently stated in Benjamin Franklin’s statement, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately” We are in this together and we admirably salute these companies and wish them God’s Speed in these troubling times.
Comment by DARTER — February 16, 2013 @ 10:09 am
I applaud Cheaper Than Dirt, the Firearm Manufacturers, and the various other companies that sell firearms for their courageous stand. I only hope that other manufacturers and gun distributors have the courage to follow suit. I feel very fortunate to live in Texas, and encourage any firearms manufacturer that is currently housed in states that are not as friendly to Second Amendment rights and firearms as Texas is to PLEASE move to Texas and make this your new home base of operations. Our Governor and State Attorney General have been very clear in their message to citizens in other states that Texas is pro Second Ammendment and is against restriting any type of legal firearms.
No state or federal legislation will keep any type of firearm out of the hands of criminals and others who mean to do harm. The police cannot and will not be there to protect honest, law abiding citizens. The only way to ensure that a safe environment is to allow those law abiding citiizens who wish to do so to arm themselves as they see fit, and to be allowed to carry their firearms either through open or concealed carry. I’m proud to say that I’m licensed to carry, and I do so knowing that I at least have the opportunity to protect myself, and those around me, if the situation should ever present itself.
Comment by Robert Gerhardt — February 16, 2013 @ 10:09 am
Of course I support these companies in their decisions. It is crazy to think that these states should benefit in any way by the laws they put in place. If you want to take somethnig from a citizen, then the government loses it also. If you want to out law a weapon, than the government loses that tax base and gets to explain to their citizens why the unemployement rolls are growing. Fiscal responsibility is something the left has never understood, but the citizens and law enforecement that do see the results will have to take action if they want to avoid these impacts.
I live minutes from the Magpul facility and Colorado is ready to allow them to continue to manufacture and sell, just not in their home state. To Magpul’s credit they are having none of that. They will move their 200+ jobs and millions in revenue out of the state. Support Magpul and the others with your pocket book. I am today!
Comment by Dan Golec — February 16, 2013 @ 10:13 am
i do support all the company’s that have chosen to take this action & feel that all the others should do the same. the weapons in question,(assault & high cap mag.) don’t kill with out someone operating them, i feel sorry for the family’s of the mass murder incidents that have happened in this country, but more enforcement of the laws that we have on the books now will do more that banning these weapons.
Comment by michael fenchak — February 16, 2013 @ 10:13 am
As a former Special Agent, Counter Intelligence, DOD, and a Retired Senior Officer CSI. I agree with these Company’s in their actions. It is time We took a stand.
Thank you
Comment by David — February 16, 2013 @ 10:14 am
You have my absolute & total support!! I certainly hope north carolina does not follow ny or ca, or any states lead in this idiotic & unconstitutional act!!! I would welcome any firearms co. to move to NC. !!!!
Comment by randy smith — February 16, 2013 @ 10:14 am
Sic semper tyrannis! Thanks for taking a stand for Freedom, which we are losing EVERY day.
Comment by Dr. Timothy Levin — February 16, 2013 @ 10:14 am
PLEASE HEAR THIS: I think that without doubt LOUISIANA would love to have all of you !!!
Comment by Joe — February 16, 2013 @ 10:16 am
I fully support those companies who have taken the stance that if a law abiding citizen cannot purchase, own, or use a product then the Law Enforcemt or Governments at any level should not be able to purchase them either. Now those companies who now have manufacturing or business interest in states or locations that are passing laws and regulations that restrict thier buisness. The solution is to move to a more business friendly place in the United States. Take full advantage of any tax breaks that come with the new location. If enough companies relocate, and stop doing buisness with Law Enforcment/ Governments in areas that restrict citizen rights it will make a difference. To get any large corporation or government to change their hostile actions is to cost them MONEY!
Comment by William Barnard — February 16, 2013 @ 10:18 am
I applaud these efforts wholeheartedly!! I never thought of a gun and ammo ban for law enforcement and other government agencies in the affected states.. It’s brilliant!! I hope all of the firearm and ammo manufacturers follow suit!
Comment by Dave Griess — February 16, 2013 @ 10:20 am
I hope they all stop selling hollow points to the Govt. too., as well as AR15, and 5.56 Ammo. Sell to the Citizens Militia first…
Comment by Tom — February 16, 2013 @ 10:22 am
Thank You To all of the companies who are taking a stand.We need everyone to stand together . I live in Maryland where 80% of the state is controlled by the two counties around Wash Dc and Balt city.We need your help. What about Beretta? They are located in Maryland. At least for now.Please watch out for our governor who wants to run for President.He is trying to place even more gun restriction on us now.
Comment by dave burkhardt — February 16, 2013 @ 10:22 am
As president of a Gun Club in the State of New Jersey, a NRA member, a member of the NJ Federation of Sportsmen,and member of the Forks of the Delaware Historical Arms Society, I fully support the Gun and Ammo manufacturers for their stand. We too as Americans need to stand together and fight for our second amendment rights. Our Gun Club and its membership have decided to reach out to the other NJ Sportsman Organizations in an effort to unite and support our rights on a State & Federal level. NOW is the time for all Americans to stand up and be heard! Our government has NO right to infringe on our Constitution. They were elected by the People and are paid for by the People…..and we the American people must let them know we can REMOVE them. STAND STRONG fellow Americans ! GOD BLESS AMERICA !!!!
Comment by Tom K (SWGC) — February 16, 2013 @ 10:23 am
You’re all welcome to come to Missouri. We can use the jobs. I’ll be more than happy to talk to the local politicians to try and get locations, tax breaks, anything you need. We’re not right to work yet, but it’s coming.
Comment by Geoff — February 16, 2013 @ 10:24 am
I, unfortunately, live in the PRK (Peoples Republic of Kalifornia), I fully support the companies who refuse to sell their weaponry to state and local agencies whose legislatures have enacted laws restricting its citizens from owning the same weaponry that they possess and want more of. Please publish a list of these bold and patriotic companies so that we can support them by directing our business in their direction.
Comment by John — February 16, 2013 @ 10:24 am
As a proud member of the NRA,I have two comments to pass on to all support of freedom. We as Americans have put these politicians in office we can also remove them the same way. Second,to all of you,join the one organization that does fight for freedom.Join the NRA now. If you are a member speak with wallet,send a donation,add a couple year to your membership or recruit a new member.The anti freedom fanatics can only be contained if we are organized and speak with one voice. A voice proclaiming liberty for all.
Comment by james van splinter — February 16, 2013 @ 10:29 am
I second the N.C. by #227 above. I am a land broker in this state and have working relations with numerous Economic Development groups. I will be more than happy to help any of you with relocation.
Comment by Mike Williams — February 16, 2013 @ 10:30 am
I am a firearms dealer and will support all companies that will NOT sell to LE/Goverment that support Gun control or bans. I live in OKLAHOMA we support all open carry and firearms owenrship. If any of these companies would really like to move, Oklahoma would be glad to have them, we are a right to work state and we have many cities that would love to have new buisness, I would even be able to supply some land to build on. All you need to do is Contact Governor Mary Fallon’s office and bet there would be incentives in place for buiness opertunities. I think it would be a good idea if there was a list available of all the companies that are in support of this! That would making buying efforts easier for all of US. Thanks Roger Wilson. Oklahoma CITIZEN, not subject!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by Roger Wilson — February 16, 2013 @ 10:33 am
NE Arkansas is very Conservative with little industry but lots of people willing to work for a decent wage. Any gun manufacturer who would consider moving here would have a very good choice of sites & a very enthusiastic potential workforce.
Comment by Larry — February 16, 2013 @ 10:33 am
I totally agree and hope all companies do the same.Citizens are not 2nd class to law enforcement or anyone.I want to thank these companies for having values above profits.I would encourage any and all to relocate here to Ohio where at least so far we do not have these issues except in a few cities.
Comment by Rick Cutshall — February 16, 2013 @ 10:40 am
I fully support this concept and will support those companies that have similar policies and will not support those companies that do not. I live in Nevada and would love to see more companies locate here.
Comment by Jim Blackwell — February 16, 2013 @ 10:42 am
I totally agree for manufactures and suppliers not sell arms to government agency’s that ban the sell of weapons to citizens in there state. Further more I support firearm manufacturing and suppliers relocating to pro gun states to run their business. I to will do my part to live in a state that is pro gun and will protect my second amendment right. Further more I will not purchase any items from any state that is anti gun. The American public needs to use their power to boycott any anti gun state of any kind of consumer goods as much as humanly possible. Americans united. Don’t let our dis functional government tear down the constitution which our forefathers put together after suffering the tyranny prior to breaking away from England and fighting the American revolution to be a free nation.
Comment by Don Robinson — February 16, 2013 @ 10:45 am
Thank You; for putting the lead-in article in your advertising e-mail. I was not aware the business community was willing to stand up to the socialist government entities. I am glad to continue utilizing your business whenever I can.
I keep getting solitations from different groups asking me to contact my senator and asking them to not support anti 2nd amendment legislation. I live in Southern California, that option is not available to me.
Keep up the “Good Work”, it is appreciated!
Respectfully Yours; Nathan
Comment by Nathan — February 16, 2013 @ 10:46 am
Thank You; for putting the lead-in article in your advertising e-mail. I was not aware the business community was willing to stand up to the socialist government entities. I am glad to continue utilizing your business whenever I can.
I keep getting solitations from different groups asking me to contact my senator and asking them to not support anti 2nd amendment legislation. I live in Southern California, that option is not available to me.
Keep up the “Good Work”, it is appreciated!
Respectfully Yours; Nathan
Comment by Nathan — February 16, 2013 @ 10:46 am
I LIVE IN NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA. I KNOW OF AT LEAST TWO FIREARMS RELATED COMPANIES THAT HAVE RECENTLY RELOCATED TO THE GUN-FRIENDLY SUNSHINE STATE. I, AND I THINK MOST OTHER FLORIDIANS, WOULD WELCOME ANY FIREARM OR FIREARM RELATED MANUFACTURER, OR SUPPLIER OF SUCH GOODS TO THE WHOLESALE OR RETAIL SEGMENT, WITH OPEN ARMS. MANY OF US FLORIDIANS ARE “ESCAPEES” FROM THE MORE OPPRESSIVE STATES IN THE NATION. I AM FULLY BEHIND ANY COMPANY THAT CHOOSES TO “FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT”, AND STAND UP FOR OUR, AND THEIR, CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND OUR GOD-GIVEN RIGHT TO PROTECT OUSELVES! LIVE FREE OR DIE!
Comment by WWW — February 16, 2013 @ 10:47 am
As a native Arizonan, I am proud to have Ruger here in Prescott. Obviously they have found the business climate favorable and I hope many other manufacturers will also in the future. Arizona is holding strong in the face of federal tyranny and appears to have no intention of taking action as a state to restrict what is constitutionally guaranteed. As far as I am concerned constitutional refugees are welcome here. My business practices will continue to support businesses that take a stand. MOLON LABE!
Comment by Zachary Zache sr. — February 16, 2013 @ 10:47 am
I fully support these manufacturers standing up against the states and cities. Fundamentally, the industry needs to stand together. Individually this will not be more than lost sales for these companies and sales filled by others. Both large and small companies need take the same stance united. I truly respect these companies for literally putting their money where their mouth is. They are at financial risk where we the individual citizens can stand and be vocal with little fear of direct repercussions. Colt, Remmington, Ruger, etc. need to get directly in the fight… Indiana is a great gun rights state and would help any firearms company thrive!
Comment by JSB — February 16, 2013 @ 10:48 am
BRAVO! I stand in support of ALL business who enact such policies both in spirit and with my $$$$!!!
Hey DPMS, Savage, Sturm Ruger, Weatherby and any other!
Come to Alabama!
We need more businesses, more jobs, and we definintely support the 2nd Amendment!
Comment by PeaseTheOldFashionedWay — February 16, 2013 @ 10:49 am
This will have to be how it is done. Support these businesses, support individuals who take a stand, help those companies and people who would relocate and get out and walk your areas at election time. The mooches and would be tyrants of our society, who can spend all of their unproductive lives trying to take what others have worked for need to be matched and overwhelmed by an army of the working patriots. Time to stop fence sitting. I will support, AND DONATE, to anyone standing up for the Constitution. This business attitude needs to be expanded. Imagine what a state legislature would have to listen to if Phillip Morris decided to stop sending cigarettes to a state that, by taxation, is affecting their bottom line. Imagine if Exxon Mobile said it wasn’t shipping fuel to California because of the costs of complying with their idiotic regulations. Or NY not getting coal because of the Communist in Chiefs beliefs about the coal industry. All of these would be a hardship on the true patriots of our nation, but the true patriots will endure. It is the mooches and takers who will fold or show their true selves. It took me 45 minutes for me to read through the comments on this one site. We have them surrounded. Make sure to let them know it.
Comment by Rueben Roberts — February 16, 2013 @ 10:50 am
Obviously, I meant “PeaceTheOldFashionedWay”.
The keys are never in the same place.
I use too many different keyboard layouts between workstations and laptops, straight and ergonomic keyboards.
Comment by PeaseTheOldFashionedWay — February 16, 2013 @ 10:51 am
I totally support these companies. Our elected officals are always passing laws for us that they are exempt from. No one is MORE equal than any one else. Next they are going to go after is our 1 st amendment rights. However, the relocation of any gun making firm will make a stronger statment. I support these manufactures in their right to not sell their products to those agencies that are trying to enact or have enacted gun control laws that violate the 2nd amendment. Stopping sales to all or any law enforcment or government agency is a great start. I will continue to buy these manufacturers products! I truley pray that the entire industry gets onboard!
Comment by Tom M — February 16, 2013 @ 10:52 am
I support these guys. My state of Oklahoma also supports them and has enacted laws to protect them if they are in our state. The city I live in (Spencer) will even provide a 50% rebate on their sales tax the first year decreasing by 10% each year thereafter. Our state has low cost of living, low unemployment, great volunteerism, and great government support. Our state is a staunch supporter of the second amendment. We did pass an open carry law law year. Firearm makers – Move to Oklahoma
Comment by Dale — February 16, 2013 @ 10:52 am
I agree with, and praise these gun manufacturers on their stance for the Second Amendment rights of Americans. I also agree that all ammunition manufacturers need to get on board with this fight. However, for this effort to have the result intended, ALL gun manufacturers, ammo producers, and gun related supplying companies must get on board. I will support any and all gun and ammo manufacturers that take this stand. I will boycott all of those companies that cow tow to the Local, State and Federal Government that attempt to diminish and deprive us of our Second Amendment rights.
Comment by MF Crier — February 16, 2013 @ 10:53 am
Thanks to all the privately owned company’s for taking a stand against all the liberal dems and government dependents waiting for a handout. You worked hard to build your company and millions of law abiding citizens depend on your company, not only for your products but for their occupations as well. Thank You! If you are forced out of your current state of operation, take a look at my state,(SOUTH CAROLINA) we would be more than happy to have you !!!!!
Comment by Victor Burkett — February 16, 2013 @ 10:53 am
I support and stand by the companies that support individual gun rights. For the last thrity to forthy years our country has gone to hell. We have become a nation of spinless cattle. New York, Cali bad guys don’t care about gun laws they will get them and use them. So law makers take the guns out of the reach of good citizens and leave them defenseless. Here in Texas we would welcome any gun manufactures to open doors here for business.
Comment by Nick Granados — February 16, 2013 @ 10:53 am
Thanks to all the privately owned company’s for taking a stand against all the liberal dems and government dependents waiting for a handout. You worked hard to build your company and millions of law abiding citizens depend on your company, not only for your products but for their occupations as well. If you are forced out of your current state of operation, take a look at my state,(SOUTH CAROLINA) we would be more than happy to have you !!!!!
Comment by Victor Burkett — February 16, 2013 @ 10:55 am
Yes,Yes, Yes to all companies taking a stand against tyrannical Federal,State and local government. I will support you financially as well as vocally. It’s time for all other firearms, ammunition and parts manufacturers to join in as well. The 2nd Amendment is a right, not a need. A Right not wish. A Right not to be messed with by the whim of the current political atmosphere. The entire Bill of “Rights” are individual in nature. No student of history can honestly deny the intent of the founders. Rights are our only guarantee against tyranny. How much longer will I be able to voice my opinion on pages such as these? The 1stAmendment will fall directly after the 2nd Amendment. We as a free people can NOT allow this to happen.
Comment by Larry — February 16, 2013 @ 10:59 am
I am in full support of all of these manufacturers. I will support them through more purchases or higher prices to afford them to move to Texas. Those who infringe on our rights should not be armed to a higher level.
Comment by Will in Texas — February 16, 2013 @ 11:03 am
Spot on for these companies! And, I support all gun manufactures, accessorys, gear, etc, that do the same. Come on people, this is not something we can sweep under the rug and hope it will go away. This is YOUR United States Citizens Rights you are fighting for, and right now the US Constitution has one foot in the grave. I, personally believe that the President of the United States is in violation of his oath,”…to support and defend the Constitution of The United States Of America…” to my knowledge nowhere in that oath does it say he has the right to change it. People a lot smarter than him wrote the thing, what on earth gives him the right to change it. I support the old America, the one in which we were all proud of, would fight for, die for, where there was politness, kindness, sympathy, and a sense of being one. This new America is devided. It ran by special interest groups with lots of money and can produce lots of votes. Sounds like an Oligarchy to me, the haves against the have nots. Well, I want the old America back and I will die fighting for that. Lets pur the Proud to Be an American back where it belongs, in the hands of the people!!
RP, Kentucky
Comment by Richard Phelps — February 16, 2013 @ 11:05 am
All companies need to get on board with boycotting every Federal, State, and local government that puts restrictions on civilians. All firearms manufactures, ammunition manufacutres, firearm accesories manufactures and any other company that supports the Second Amendment. Like all the companies that pulled out of the Eastern Sports and Outdoor Show, everyone needs to Boycott these agencies. STAND AND FIGHT for the Second Amendment.
Comment by Anthony Triemert — February 16, 2013 @ 11:07 am
if we had stuck w/ our consitutionally guaranteed nationwide, ‘well regulated militia’, we would’nt have this problem; no one would want to create such a problem; historically, logically, BTW, a militia should be a military unit(s),obviously capable of meeting the challenges of the day, ie, potential military, domestic tyranny, dictatorship-forces; today, that would mean being able to take down a reatively new, universal military threat: armored vehicles; meaning, all american militia units should have at least .50 sniper rifles; all
Comment by barry — February 16, 2013 @ 11:10 am
I’m in California and I have to say…..although I support what these companies are doing, I also have to make it clear that a lot of companies do the exact same thing to ME. They won’t sell to law aboding Californians. This goes for items that are LEGAL here. There are a LOT fo gun owners in CA and it sucks to be put into some kind of general “California nuts” category as if we are all San Francisco liberals (WE ARE NOT). As a former soldier I met a lot of people from different states and the “fruits and nuts” ideas were rampant from people that never set foot here. Don’t punish people for their crappy state governments.
Comment by Brett — February 16, 2013 @ 11:12 am
I fully support manufacturers boycotting the Federal and State Government supply chain. Colorado is on the verge of enacting a magazine limit of 15 rounds and MagPul has stated that they will pull out of Colorado with the resulting loss of 100′s of jobs if this becomes law. This will be a tremendous sacrifice on their part, but they are willing to do it in opposition to our Democratic held House and Senate. Please support any manufacturer who defends our 2nd ammendment rights.
Comment by Chuck Hemstreet — February 16, 2013 @ 11:14 am
All firearms companies and ammo manufacturers must relocate to TEXAS IMMEDIATELY! Bring your employees with you too. We have plenty of room and the second largest port in the USA at the Port of Houston…. Governor Perry will welcome you, along with our citizens, with open arms with tax incentives…… come to Texas… but please first things first. CTD PLEASE STOP PRICE GOUGING YOUR CUSTOMERS AT ONCE. I understand demand is high but one day it will level off and we religious gun owners / purchasers and ammo purchasers will remember when 1000 rounds of 5.56 was 549.00 in October 2012 and the same ammo went to $1000 dollar’s for 1000 rounds in late December….. food for thought.
Second A rights supporter Houston Texas.
Comment by John Davis — February 16, 2013 @ 11:15 am
Reality check!
Police, Military retired or active,Dept.of Hoeland Security, TSA DEA and all the fed staye security do not need any US arms contractors wether it is ammo or arms.
Who makes the SAW, the sidearms and a lot of the “pieces that go into some of your AR¿
Why any one other than a company wanting cheap labor would move into what rank as poorest in all catagorys from schools to. medical care and wages.
We are looking at last gadp of independent arms makers for the common man and those who are so limited by black guns will fall right and left.
Thete will only be a vrry few manufacturing if they have no one too sell too except those who have excess cash on hand.
Smith andwesson dold out to frds gor gun registration undr
Clinton and oh how we eere gonna embargo them.
Without regional blocks and rrade only betwern thosr regions cpuld any thing like this be evonomicly viable
Police already have no loyalty except to paychecks ando tody at lesst 5 citizens will be unconstitutionall beat molested and 2 of them will be killed while unarmed.
NY was worse state for that but it fid mpt dtop sales of guns.
Parts of South Carolina are damn police states already and their sheriffs are better armed than some 100 nations.
KEEPlooking for the easy way out and some gun toting messiah to save your guns.
Taint gonna happen! You do it the hard way or forget it they’ ve won.
WA would not even burp if Oly Arms just closed down.
Comment by Hide Behind — February 16, 2013 @ 11:22 am
One more voice of support for the principled stand of businesses resisting federal and state government encroachment on firearms ownership. It takes a lot of courage because state and federal law enforcement dollars are really important to these companies; A good contract can make or break a small firearms company. I don’t blame companies who don’t feel like they can make the same courageous stand but I am surely grateful for those that do and will give those companies my dollars.
To win this fight we must all carry the fight to our local politicians with the NRA, the NSSF, and other organizations. We also need every man and woman we can get. Reach out to your friends and neighbors, take them shooting, and help them see there is nothing to fear from the community of gun owners. We aren’t crazy faceless strangers, we’re their friends, their neighbors, and co-workers. If we let people know us for who we are, we shall prevail.
Comment by Brady — February 16, 2013 @ 11:25 am
As an officer of the court in NYS, for over 25 years I can tell you, the courts are full of employees who support RTKBA, and further, we never, ever see anyone in court who bought their gun legally, or more importantly, who is legally allowed to own any firearm.
So from the judges to the clerks, to the court officers, the sentiment is pretty much 80 percent that Albany is simply passing feel good legislation. Hell, I just took a hacksaw and cut the bayonet lug off of my Garand to comply with their law. But I will not have to register it without a bayonet lug. I know, it’s ludicrous. No one I know with a badge plans on registering any long gun. Period.
The only people in this state who will register long guns are competition shooters. This will be an utter failure. And we all pretty much agree, if we can get fresh mozzarella cheese and good Chinese food, we’re all leaving ASAP. I love this state. My family has been here since the 1830s. My relatives have died fighting world wars. My feeling is that we didn’t win the cold war, we lost because the enemy took over our local municipalities. But all hope is not lost. Each time I lose hope, I take some new shooter to the range with a .22. Each time I lose hope I get someone a form to apply for a CCW. The goal of the gun banners is to make us give up. The goal is not to disarm us, for they know they cannot. Their goal is to disarm our GRANDCHILDREN. So THE MOST IMPORTANT THING any gun owner can do is get new people shooting, the younger the better.
And yes, although I hope Kimber stays in Yonkers, and I hope Remington stays, their moves to one of the FREE STATES would send a powerful message to our leaders. But sadly, that type of movement will lead to a two states of America, where one state has firearms freedom, and the other does not. United we stand, divided we fall. We must do everything in our power to make sure that we stay one UNITED STATES.
Comment by RICKNYS — February 16, 2013 @ 11:26 am
THANK YOU for your leadership. we will support you. how about a logo next to your name to help you stand out. maybe an equal sign. if government agents are ‘more equal’ than the rest of us, then we will just be subjects.
Comment by carl holsather — February 16, 2013 @ 11:26 am
I fully support these companies and cheaper than dirt for sticking up for our 2nd amendment rights. Our new AG here in Pa looks like She will be a gun grabber,if thay’s the case We will consider moving to Texas or Alaska.
Comment by RJ Shipe — February 16, 2013 @ 11:29 am
I live in Tucson, AZ, the lowest-ranking state on the Brady Campaign Scorecard, and one of the most civilized places I have ever lived (FL, MA, NJ, OH, AZ). People do not honk their horns, curse each other, flip birds at each other, cut each other off in traffic… road rage is virtually non-existent. Of course, we are a “Constitutional Carry State” which could have something to do with it.
It could also be all those U of A Aerospace Engineering graduates, too.
We have more BSAEs than we have jobs for here… SEND GUN MANUFACTURERS HERE NOW ! ! !
The weather is great, the shooting ranges are great, and… we’re all sold out of everything here too…
JBev – Unemployed Manufacturing Engineer
Comment by JBev — February 16, 2013 @ 11:30 am
I agree with most of what has been said above. Will law enforcement, the National Guard and HSD be limited to the same standards as citizens….No.
Comment by Marvin McEldowney — February 16, 2013 @ 11:31 am
Any and ALL gun manufacturers are WELCOME to move their business to our Great State of Georgia where they will be WELCOMED and appreciated. We appreciate any business that supply’s a product that WE THE PEOPLE need in our eveyday lives as well as the jobs that will come with them should they decide to move their operations here.
Comment by C Walls — February 16, 2013 @ 11:38 am
I agree completely with the companies that relocate and won’t sell their product to law enforcement agencies that won’t let their civilians own the products.I feel that the Feds don’t need to tell us what we can and can’t own. This is supposed to be a free country and by damn lets keep it that way.
Comment by Prater — February 16, 2013 @ 11:41 am
I think they should take it further. stop selling guns, body armour, ammo etc to all gov’t agencies until they get their panties outta their crack. Lake city can barely keep up with production of ammo needed for the two wars we have been figting for ten year. What do you think would happen if winchester, remington,hornady ect said we will no longer be selling ammo or guns to gov’t agencies. Yes it would hit the compaies hard at first but I bet you the gov’t would blink first. They don’t have the resources, equipment or time to make all the ammo they would need for just one year.
Comment by William Poteet — February 16, 2013 @ 11:42 am
It’s also time for the companies of Armalite and Rock River Arms to pull the plug on their “tax dollar gratuities” to the state of Illinois,and the Democratic Republic of Chicago; and move somewhere that appreciates the quality and dignity of their work! I’m a proud owner of Armalites’ AR10ARBNMF which I had to patiently wait 2 years for, because of this same twisted administration. I will not give it up, because I firmly believe that during the next four years of this “administration”; there will be a time that the nation will call up, and depend on a “well-armed, standing Militia”. Support and defend the Constitution of these United States of America against ALL ENEMIES, both Foreign and DOMESTIC!
Comment by Al'sStand — February 16, 2013 @ 11:42 am
I applaud the companies taking the position that if the citizens cant own certain firearms then the local LE should not either. Im not talking about automatic versus semi-automatic. We live in a state where gang related violence is out of control and based on the pictures that we see on the news almost daily the the criminal element has access to anything they want. The government cannot protect my home fast enough so when the next home invasion comes knocking I will knock back. The government should not be able to dictate how I protect my family. When the major earthquake comes we will be the next New Orleans (Katrina) all over again and those that are not prepared are in total denial. The Obama administration as well as Boxer and Feinstein have the luxury of 24-hour security protection paid for with my taxpayer money. They will not tell me how I can or cannot protect my family.
Comment by eric schwartz — February 16, 2013 @ 11:47 am
This is great and I support all Firearms manufactures who do this.
All ammo companies need to do the same!!!
We all need to stand together and stand up for our rights.
We have taken it on the chin long enough….
Stand Up and Be Counted!!!
Comment by Michael Casida — February 16, 2013 @ 11:58 am
I DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE BIG DEAL IS MAYBE I’M MISSING SOMETHING I AM A DISABLED VET,AND EVEN I HAVE THE RIGHT TO OWN,PURCHASE 7 POSESS FIREARMS.I OWN A AR-15 & AN AK 47 PRE BAN 1960.SO I HAVE TO SHOOT ONLY 7 ROUNDS NO BIG DEAL TO ME AS LONG AS I HIT WHAT MY SCOPE OR IRON SIGHT HITS ITS FINE.I WLL REGISTER MT FIRARMS IF NEEDED IN NY WE HAVE ONE YR.AND THE FACT OF THE MATTER ACCORDING TO THE STATE POLICE AS LONG AS WE REGISTER THEM SO BE IT.I DON’T NEED ALL THOSE BELLS & WHISLES TO BE A COMPETIVE SHOOTER,UNLESS I AM HUNTING COYATE.STOP ALL THE BS IT COULD BE WORSE OUR STATE POLICE HERE ARE NOT GOING FOR CONFICATION NOR RANGE MONITORS THEY ARE JUST GOING TO DO THERE JOB AS PROTCT & SEVRE. RANGER BOB USA RET SF/RANGER,GUNSMITH,SNIPER.
Comment by SGT(RET) ROBERT A DE SANDRO USA DAV — February 16, 2013 @ 12:00 pm
I would like to see ALL firearm manufactures stop sales to restrictive states. And also forbid their wholesalers and retailers from selling to them as well. Once the police can’t buy any firearms from any source within the US or any importer, maybe we can be heard from. Hardly possible, but a nice thought.
Comment by Dennis Crabtrey, AL — February 16, 2013 @ 12:03 pm
I love all these comments by our American citizens and the stand taken by these companies. It doesn’t get any better than reading all this on a saturday afternoon. I applaud these companies and will continue to support them and will spread the word about the stand they are taking against those states that want to legislate away more and more of our rights. We will welome them here in Florida!
Comment by Stephen Smith — February 16, 2013 @ 12:03 pm
THANK YOU !!!! Great idea and I hope it spreads like a wildfire among manufacturers and retailers,, but… There will always be a dealer that will sell to them. Greed over principal. I vow to only buy from Companys that support the Second amendment and the cause.
Comment by Steve C — February 16, 2013 @ 12:10 pm
Thanks to all who will stand for OUR Constitution. Our state,Georgia, home of Glock, will welcome any who would move their business here.We need to stand united in the legal battle for our rights.
Comment by Herb Kreuzburg — February 16, 2013 @ 12:11 pm
I certainly support the position taken by these companies. I only wish that they would all pull out of the states that have passed these restrictive gun laws. Hit them where it hurts – tax revenue. Why continue to feed the coffers of a hostile government. I’d celebrate every move like this, and go out of my way to patronize those companies in the future.
Comment by Brian Scott — February 16, 2013 @ 12:11 pm
I do agree with the status of not selling to those who dont think we as citizens should have the same guns as the law
we in ky already have remington and would honor any of your companies to come to our state to work
i salute you on your efforts and standing up for we the people
Comment by elizabeth burkeen — February 16, 2013 @ 12:14 pm
Not only do I support these companies, when the anti-gun states lose revenue from sales tax, employment tax and revenue taxes from these companies maybe they’ll face reality. Legislators vote their pocket books. If Glock and others join in and the LE are forced to carry 6 shot revolvers, the lessons on being anti-gun will be learned.
Comment by Bill walsh — February 16, 2013 @ 12:15 pm
If all the manufacturers would take this type of stand, can you imagine the impact that would have on state and federal governments, all us have a responsibility to fight against unconstitutional laws, it is our duty as civilians and LE and politicians.
If we don’t, who will.
We all need to do our part, do not abide, obey or recognize any unconstitutional gun law from the past or future. Take a stand.
Comment by Paul — February 16, 2013 @ 12:19 pm
Having just received my FFL, and now having to get a special NYS FFL, I see the redundancy that is state government. I am happy to say that our new company will support the idea of “the haves and have nots” as truly draconian. We are responsible gun owners and sellers. If the radicals ends of this discussion would only get out of the way, we might be able to achieve the intent of the Second Ammendment while also achieving safer gun usage.
Comment by Rita Carver — February 16, 2013 @ 12:20 pm
I will support any and all companies that will stand up to the anti’s and their paid off, blinder wearing, idiot represenitives. Wake up America, once they take our rights. We won’t get them back. Remember, the nearest police officer is only 5 minutes away. It only takes 7/10th’s of a second to die.
Comment by Peter Meeuse — February 16, 2013 @ 12:23 pm
I fully endorse ANY company that finds its strength and united voice when resisting oppressive governments (Fed or State) that attack us all. I will personally seek to do business with every one of the companies that support the rights of the American people. And I will intentionally redirect my support (i.e. money/purchases) away from companies that support any effort to undermine the US Constitution. We need to also pay attention to companies (like B of America) that, I believe illegally, try to force other companies out of business. Stay United, support only these true Americans and their respective companies – and turn away from all the administration stooges.
Comment by Eric D. — February 16, 2013 @ 12:23 pm
We all need to stand together on this!!!! No more sales to gov, and only the people!! Move to citrus county Florida we need jobs here!!! James morakis
Comment by James — February 16, 2013 @ 12:24 pm
YES! Please do come to Idaho, the last, great, conservative state in the country! We would love to have and do business with pro-people gun companies and would be more than happy to have the jobs to boot!
Comment by Richard — February 16, 2013 @ 12:28 pm
WE WANT THE GUN BUILDERS AND BULLIT COMPANYS IN OUR STATES.
If they want gays in the millitary, Boy Scouts, Cal. IL. NY. and other states. We are tired of being pushed around by perverts, Liberal Media,
Our God being slaped in the face by Our Goverment, I say we have the power to change all of this.
Join the N.R.A
WE HAVE THE GUNS
Comment by BCB — February 16, 2013 @ 12:29 pm
I agree with what the manufactures have done but think it should be carried a step further to include federal agencies such as Homeland Security, FBI, and all others including the armed forces of the U S A.
Oklahoma has some of the least restrictive gun lawa of any state, Including Concealed
Carry and Open Carry and would be welcomed to move their business here.
Cheaper than Dirt have raised their prices so I don’t think I will be doing business with them anymore. In some cases more than double.
What I really can’t understand is why you can’t find ammo anymore and people are trying to really gouge you on Armslist by reselling their ammo at more than double the price.
Comment by John Wallace — February 16, 2013 @ 12:34 pm
Are you sure that Cheaper Than Dirt is the one to lead this campain? Since you were the first to cave in and your PRESIDENT stopped firearm sales. Your company came to its senses and started with hopefully new manament. But yes the manufactures should go to states where they are business friendly. I own a small service business and am stuck. If I were manufacturing I would go to Texas.
Comment by G W — February 16, 2013 @ 12:34 pm
I agree with what the manufactures have done but think it should be carried a step further to include federal agencies such as Homeland Security, FBI, and all others including the armed forces of the U S A.
Oklahoma has some of the least restrictive gun lawa of any state, Including Concealed
Carry and Open Carry and manufacurers would be welcomed to move their business here.
Cheaper than Dirt have raised their prices so I don’t think I will be doing business with them anymore. In some cases more than double.
What I really can’t understand is why you can’t find ammo anymore and people are trying to really gouge you on Armslist by reselling their ammo at more than double the price.
Comment by John Wallace — February 16, 2013 @ 12:35 pm
I would love to see gun manufactures move to Michigan, I would not even mind one in my neighborhood. I think that it is great that some of these manufactures are standing up against some of these stupid laws that are being passed. Solidarity Brothers and sisters
Comment by Mark Stanley — February 16, 2013 @ 12:39 pm
Secession is On The Way by the South, Most of the Rocky Mountain States and from Texas to the Canadian Border.
And this time the South will have the Moral High Ground !!!
Anti-Abortion, Anti-Same Sex Marriage and Pro 2nd Amendment.
Seriously ……… Secession is On The Way. I am a Northerner who has lived in Louisiana and Texas and I am just speaking what I have Experienced in the Last Few Years.
Comment by Larry M. — February 16, 2013 @ 12:39 pm
I applaud these efforts and agree 100% with the principle and logic behind it. All of these politicians don’t have a problem with the people hired to protect them carrying these type of weapons to protect them, nor do the rich Hollywood Hollywood elite like the vocal Rosie O’Donnell (hypocrite) have a problem with it. If you really want to make an impact, kick it up one more step. If all the gun manufacturers and producers of ammunition and parts would get together and stop all sales to of any gun or any ammunition to these states and and municipalities and to the Federal Government as well (with the exception of the U.S. Military) and give them a sampling of what it is like to have someone arbitrarily deny their 2nd Amendment rights. This would dovetail nicely with their illogical so called attempt to disarm the bad guys and arm the good guys. Give them a dose of their own medicine.
Comment by William Heins — February 16, 2013 @ 12:40 pm
A big THANK YOU to all Gun Manufactures and acc. builders ,all who are involved in this indestury I feel you are going about this the best way and it might get the attention of State and local goverments, I will be buying from you in the futher, THANK YOU again for helping.
Comment by Robert Jones — February 16, 2013 @ 12:40 pm
Hey folks, lets get serious here. Remember where our POTUS ( President of the United States ) comes from. Chicago, the city with the toughest gun control laws in the country ( many of which our POTUS helped pass ). He himself stated that there were 453 gun related deaths there last year alone. That’s what happens when you disarm people. Ask the Jewish People what happened in Germany when Hitler implemented Gun Control. Or the Cambodians under Pol Pot. Millions and millions of innocent people MURDERED!!! Because they had no means to defend themselves from a corrupt government.
Comment by P. M. — February 16, 2013 @ 12:40 pm
Yes, I support those private businesses who consciously decide to not sell to those Government entities, be it federal, state or local, any item prohibited for sale to law abiding Citizens. These entities are no better than any one Citizen. The statement “WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO DENY SERVICE TO ANYONE” is a standard for American businesses. If you live by the sword, you might certainly perish by it. Bring your businesses to Texas. A HUGE state which embraces the gun culture and right of ownership, where there is plenty of room for everyone to thrive economically.
And remember, DON’T MESS WITH TEXAS, is more than just a motto!!!
Comment by RPK — February 16, 2013 @ 12:41 pm
I am done with the east coast restrictions on firearms, including the new ones coming down the pipeline.That is why I am selling my house and moving to Arizona in the next few months, I’m just letting the school year finish up and then I’m gone. The only reason the government wants its law abiding citizens weapons restricted is so they will be helpless (or as good as) when they decide to push their real agenda. I commend any and all firearm and ammo manufacturing companies that move to states that respect the 2nd amendment and encourage them to follow the lead of several companies that refuse to sell guns and ammo to both the state and governmental employees of states that restrict their citizens of the weapons they themselves can own. I fully support them and know that the laws won’t change until the governmental agencies feel the same pain they are placing on their citizens.
Comment by Brian — February 16, 2013 @ 12:42 pm
I have a long standing policy of not providing tax dollars to “unfriendly” states. When I travel, I don’t even stop in Illinois for gas, food or lodging and hence I wont buy items from these states anyway. I can only vote with my dollars and the vendors who have businesses planted in aggressive states only serve to promote the ambitions of those states (and their politicians )via their tax payments and employees payroll dollars. The jobs lost are unfortunate, but perhaps the employees would be better off to get out as well and stop giving their tax dollars. Enough tax dollars leave, then perhaps they will see their errors (yeah right).
Comment by Jim Hunter — February 16, 2013 @ 12:42 pm
I total agree with and will faithfully support any company and/or manufacturer that stands up to the unconstitutional attack on my rights, and further vow to boycot any that seem fit to take advantage of this opening to slither in on their bellies to grab a share of the market, left open by those I will support, all in the name of the almighty dollar.
Anyone else want to make this or a similar pledge!
Comment by Joe Robinson — February 16, 2013 @ 12:43 pm
I applaud the actions of Olympic Arms , Cheaper then Dirt etc. as defending the rights of the 2nd. Amendment. States like New York etc. who enact laws to different classes of people and who do not support the rights of the 2md Amendment, should be banned from all suppliers of firearms, ammunition, apparel, accessories and manufacturing etc. by all companies doing any business whether civilian, military, Government Agencies etc. until such time the laws are changed in that State. I realize this maybe an economic hardship on some firearm manufactures and suppliers etc., but the stance must be made and clear to other States, organizations, Politicians the economic impact of such laws will have for these thoughtless gun regulations. I would encourage all manufactures, suppliers , distributors of firearms and related equipment relocate or plan to relocate to Utah, where the rights of the People are recognized and respected. Utah has a strong educated work force, western-ed style of living, low employment rate, high tech facilities. Great schools, low crime, and everyone is “packing” and taught at a young age firearm safety, hunting , outdoor activities, and respect for our natural environment. I guarantee you any loss of sales to these gun grabbing states and Federal Government extremist will be doubled back in profits if you locate to Utah.
Comment by Steve Covalt — February 16, 2013 @ 12:43 pm
Congrats to the brave CEO’s and other officials who are making these decisions. I’ve been stating for years that I wished just one automobile manufacturer would tell the state of California that it would no longer sell cars in that state. Not intil Calif. removed all unwarrented requirements that are beyond what any other state requires. Everyone in the other 49 states are affected by one states rediculous requirements. And that just is NOT the American way. Build all ythe auto dealerships you want– just OUTSIDE the California state boundries. ALL the surrounding states would be glad to have the additional businesses and so the tax base.
So I applaude all companies that will stand up to restrictive, wrong thinking governments and the elected leaders of those states. They should NOT be leaders, and these actions may help the voters of those states to realize their errors in electing thse people in the firts place. Good riddence to all of them.
Comment by Tim — February 16, 2013 @ 12:45 pm
I support the actions of those company’s to restrict their sales to any agency who does not support the second amendment and kudos to them. That’s their right. I also support any individual who limits their purchases, when possible, to support those companies. I will do the same. If more of these manufacturers and suppliers do the same, think of the strong message it would send and the power it would yield, that law abiding, gun owning citizens of Our United States will not tolerate the lunacy these non second amendment, anti-gun politicians and their laws that they are trying to bring to bare upon us in the name of gun control. If enough of these companies do the same and enough people purchase only from those companies, the companies who don’t withhold sales will have no choice but to get on board or risk losing revenue. We as gun owning citizens need to support any and all creative ways to stand up for our Constitution. THE BEAR HAS AWOKEN!
Comment by Mike — February 16, 2013 @ 12:46 pm
You all would be more than welcome to move your firearms and ammunition business to anti-Obama and pro gun Oklahoma.Our SMOKIN’ HOT Govoner, Mary Fallin, will welcome you with open arms.
Comment by Robert Lindsey — February 16, 2013 @ 12:48 pm
Contact every arm and ammunition manufacturer in the USA, tell them to join the fight!!!
Comment by Steve C — February 16, 2013 @ 12:49 pm
Give your loyalty and your business to those states which respect your constitutional rights. Let those who don’t go broke and don’t bail them out.
Comment by William Farquhar — February 16, 2013 @ 12:52 pm
I also commend these companies taking the point . I also wish and hope that all American Firearms Companies will follow suit. I have prayed that it would not happen , BUT the U S Government has drawn the line in the sand. We must stand together and oppose a government that is so willing to ignore the United States Constitution and say we have no rights. The audacity of this government to dismiss our rights and to ignore the fact that this is the very reason that the Unites States Of America exists today , is because of this type of thinking and action.
Comment by Tom Anderson — February 16, 2013 @ 12:56 pm
I specifically support any firearm manufacturer or supplier in the State of Minnesota (of which there are many ie. Federal Ammunition /American Eagle, Magnum Research , etc.), to discuss their business and the importance of their presence in this State with any Minnesota government agency in light of the status of H.F. No.’s 241 and 242 currently being considered by Minnesota’s House and Senate.
Minnesota House members who sponsored these bills actually and recently walked out of hearings attended by the public. This is unprecedented in Minnesota’s history and should be considered unconstitutional. These people represent the citizens of the State of Minnesota “Where nothing is allowed”. People throughout this Country should be aware of this behavior and beware of the state of mind of some of it’s of it’s political “leaders”.
We have our own Pelosies and Feisteins.
Comment by Ted Steiner — February 16, 2013 @ 12:56 pm
Anything the “people” can’t have, the government should not be allowed to have either !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Comment by D. C. Miller — February 16, 2013 @ 12:56 pm
75.I read through about 20% of the posted comments and I have two observations to make. One,to those who don’t get why anyone would need to own an ar-15 type firearm I say “you don’t need to own one,but don’t tell me I can’t”. Second we as a group of sportsman should attempt when ever possible to support companies that support our freedom under the 2nd ammendment. Keep freedom alive,speak with one voice,do not allow wedges issues to divide us. Today its my ar-15 maybe tomorrow its your Remington 1100.Stand together or fall alone. Support the NRA.
Comment by james van splinter — February 16, 2013 @ 1:02 pm
I thank all companies that are refusing to do business with restrictive state governments such as New York. I also thank those that are holding the government agencies to the same standards as the citizens. I live in NY. I can no longer buy 1000 rounds of ammunition. The state and its municipalities should be held to the same. I want all ammunition suppliers to hold the government agencies to the same strict controls on ammunition as the citizens are subjected to. I guess purchasing one box (20 to 50 rounds) at a time would be sufficient for the police in NY.
When the so-called representatives passed the SAFE Law in NY they forgot to exempt law enforcement. Don’t know if they fixed that yet, but just an indicator of the kind of fools that write and vote on these laws.
I do not want to see Remington leave NY, but if they do I can’t blame them.
I am a retired police officer; I am ashamed of my state legislators and Gov. Andrew Cuomo for violating the Constitution.
The more pressure that can be put on the state and the municipalities the better. Thank you to all the companies that support citizens 2nd Amendment rights.
Comment by Bill — February 16, 2013 @ 1:03 pm
I think the gun companies are on the right track but not enough. The entire weapons and ammo manufacturing industry should cease sales to the U.S. government and all police agencies nationwide. They should be diverting their production to the public as rapidly as possible. We’ll take care of ourselves. Let them learn “We the People” still control our government not the other way around. I know it sounds extreme but if all the powers that be are prevented from obtaining weapons to use against it’s citizenry they might just get the message once and for all. They serve us, not the other way around. Our entire county is going on an ever faster slide down the toilet because “We the People” have kept our mouths shut too long. Our government and big business are in bed with each other and only out to benefit themselves not our country. Society is based on everyone getting together to better everyone not just a select few.
Comment by austin — February 16, 2013 @ 1:04 pm
I fully support you and other companies with this plan. It’s time for ALL law abiding citizens and business owners to stand together and fight this infringement on our rights as Americans.As for companies closing their doors in the states with strict gun laws. That is exactly what they should do. I relize the cost is exorbitant to move a factory. That being said. Remove those states tax base, and see how long it takes those states to figure out what they are doing is not acceptable.Hit them where it counts in their coffers. Oregon would be a great place to open business. Low restriction, good shipping channels, trainable work force, and all around great place to live. Thanks again top notch.
Comment by Chris Lindfors — February 16, 2013 @ 1:05 pm
We appreciate the CTD community’s thoughts on this issue. There are currently (1:00 p.m. CDT Saturday) almost 300 additional comments awaiting moderation, and the 550+ public and pending comments overwhelmingly support the idea of companies enacting state-level sales restrictions on agencies.
Sometime next week, I’ll forward the link to this blog item to the PR contacts at NSSF and NRA and ask them to consider promoting the policy officially.
If you learn of other companies which decide to participate, please post a link to their online sales statements here in the comments section.
If you operate a personal or business Facebook page, please consider adding this blog url to your feed. If you aren’t on Facebook, please forward the story link to some of your friends or fellow shooters via email.
If you can take a minute, please consider writing words of encouragement to the companies who’ve taken the bold step to restrict state-level agency sales. As this effort grows, there will be media and political blowback, and a kind word to the firms on the tip of the spear would be helpful.
Also, when I was updating the company list last night, I referenced “An NC Gun Blog,” http://www.ncgunblog.com/new-york-boycott/. Hat tip to them.
NC Gun Blog added another company today, Bullwater Enterprises. Find Bullwater’s statement here: http://www.facebook.com/andrew.orphanoudakis/posts/205696806241664
Woody @ CTD
Comment by Woody — February 16, 2013 @ 1:08 pm
I applaud the companies that are standing up for 2nd Amendment rights. Any state (or government) that allows its agents to purchase one set of weapons, and its citizens another is clearly not a government of the people. We need a list of manufacturers that WILL still sell to these governments that put themselves above their citizens; I will boycott companies that support regressive governments and make my purchases with companies that support normal citizens. By the way, Kansas is looking for a few good companies to relocated here. Kansas is taking the path of many other states in providing a “business friendly” environment.
Comment by Lenny Hoag — February 16, 2013 @ 1:08 pm
California is trying to ban all AR-15 look-a-likes and will make all gun-owners register the ones they have with serial numbers and description of rifle. Also no more detachable magazines;even on handguns. These people are “gun-grabbers” of the 1st degree.
Comment by thaum wakefield — February 16, 2013 @ 1:10 pm
i use sportsman guide and cheaper than dirt from now on i will use cheaper than dirt unless sportsman giude follows suit
Comment by brian — February 16, 2013 @ 1:15 pm
Brothers in Arms, a Virginia based 2nd amendment rights action group strongly puts
it’s support behind cheaper than dirt and other gun and accessory supply companies.
We are a peaceful proactive group of average joe’s that participate in
non-confrontational demonstrations at our state capital and other locales.
God speed!!!
Comment by John Harrison — February 16, 2013 @ 1:18 pm
Hell yes I’ll support them. The 2nd Amendment was not to guarantee our right to hunt, but to prevent any government (even an elected one) from trampling the individual freedoms of the citizenry as guaranteed by the Constitution. Well done to those companies standing up for us. We need the “big boys” (where are you Colt, Remington, S+W, Springfield, etc?) to put the pressure on as well.
Comment by TW — February 16, 2013 @ 1:20 pm
These gun manufactures need to move to Michigan as we are making ANY gun manufacture exempt from federal ban if the weapon is made and sold in Michigan and I believe that they are giving some tax breaks also if they move here .
Comment by Michael Miedzianowski — February 16, 2013 @ 1:27 pm
I totally agree with them cutting off the law enforcement, if we are going to face tyranny it will be behind the mask of a badge. I’d love to see all the firearms companies move to states like Texas where they will not be infringed. The civillians should be armed just as well if not better than our police forces, we may some day need to pick up a rifle and die a free man, or turn your head and be a slave. The world climate we have N. korea and iran trying to build nuclear plants /// arms, syria is in open revolt south africa is over taken by millitants to the extent a machine gun is a common house hold item Mexico has had a death toll over 70,000 and firearms are nearly impossible to get except for the ones the cartels were handed by obama and eric holder. This could go on for days. Yes people die from guns but more die from tobacco or drunk drivers or drowning.
Comment by Jerry — February 16, 2013 @ 1:32 pm
I really support the views presented in the article, feeling that their stance is fair and positive. Utah is a very pro-2n amendment and has a great environment for Business and living, so come on over!
Comment by Cheryl Kehl — February 16, 2013 @ 1:33 pm
You know if they cracked down on the gang members and really enforced the laws we already have for the criminals the crimes with firearms would go down , BUT the criminals have it better in jails and prisons than on the street with medical , food and excercise yards . We need to make the firearm charge mean they serve FULL sentence with NO early release and no good time served , make them work and take away the TVs and radios and quit making the tax payers responsible for their care MAYBE than they will be more likely NOT want to commit the crimes . I also believe that if they KILL with ANY weapon than we should do immediate death sentence after conviction of the crime and let us clear up our prison population as I know that would put the fear of god in the criminal just like labeling the gangs as DOMESTIC TERRORIST and make them serve federal time for crimes .
Comment by Michael Miedzianowski — February 16, 2013 @ 1:36 pm
To all these companies that are fighting back, my hat is off to you! All others should join in too, cut off all ammo and guns to these states police and see how fast they change there tunes. And if you find other states supporting them after the complete ban cut that state off also. It will not take long for them to bow!
Comment by Craig — February 16, 2013 @ 1:38 pm
I don’t think they should stop with guns & part’s. I think ammo manufacturers should do the same thing right away! State guard also. We need to unite now or the liberals will win this fight. Things like this are what are ruining this country.
Comment by Cory — February 16, 2013 @ 1:49 pm
I will fully support companies that adhear to this policy. I served 4 years in the Navy and have spent 34 years as a law enforcement officer. I took an oath to uphold the constitution for both positions. The second ammendment gives us the right to keep and bear arms. This right must not be infringed on. I feel that all fireaems and ammunition manufactures must defend the second ammendment. They could be our last line of defence against the tirany in this country. I have been a long time member of the NRA and hope that everyone who would read this post would join the NRA, if not already a member. I have already notified my state and federal legislators of my position on gun control. I would ask that everyone call or email their legislators.
Comment by Gary Vaughan — February 16, 2013 @ 1:54 pm
I totally support those companies taking steps that will impact politicians power bases and negatively affect their ability to act without consequences.
I will also try to support those companies with my purchases, in order to offset some of the losses they will incur because of their not selling to specific government agencies, stated, and departments.
Unfortunately, many politicians are often more influenced by actions that impact their own power and pocketbooks than by values or what the people who elected them desire and believe.
However, the good thing about that is that when enough people are upset with the same thing at the same time to take action together, and those actions impact the politicians’ ability to become more powerful or prosperous, most politicians will bend to the will of the people in order to retain their own power and position.
Yes, MOVE to the states that support the 2nd Amendment, and that support the rights of citizens to own the products that the arms manufactures produce. It won’t take long for the pressure to mount from those in states whose money supports the politicians to look again at the “issues” (money / tax base)that states are losing because the manufacturers have moved.
Comment by Red — February 16, 2013 @ 1:54 pm
Dear Sir,
I am deeply disturbed and dissapointed with the governments decision to impinge once again on our 2nd Ammendment rights. My family and I fled communist Cuba in 1965. One of the first enactment by that haenous regime was to disarm the people, indeed ownership of a firearm in Cuba is punishable for up to 10 years in prison. The only ones affected by the proposed AWB will be the law abiding citizens of this great nation. The criminal element will always find a way to obtain illucit weapons. Once again, it is politics as usual in Washington. What makes my country the greatest nation on earth is the God given right of each and every citizen to critize the government without fear of repercussion. What’s next? An attack on our first Ammendment rights? It is the duty of each citizen in this country whether we agree or not to defend the God given rights provided to us by our Founding fathers in the Constitution. God bless America, land of the free.
Comment by Andres J Tamayo, M.D. — February 16, 2013 @ 1:55 pm
I AM VERY HAPPY TO SEE THE GUN MANUFACTURERS TRY AND FIGHT BACK AGAINST THE SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT THAT NOW CONTROLS OUR COUNTRY. I AM A 69 YEAR OLD RETIRED DEPUTY CONSTABLE IN TEXAS. NEVER ONCE DID I EVER HAVE TROUBLE WITH ANYONE WITH A CONCEALED CARRY LICENSE. MY FATHER WHO FOUGHT IN WORLD II TOLD ME THAT THE FIRST THING EITHER RADICAL LEFT OR RIGHT FORMS OF GOVERNMENT TRY TO DO I TAKE GUNS AWAY FROM THE PEOPLE SO THEY COULDN’T FIGHT BACK AND RETAKE THEIR FREEDOM . JUST BEFORE THIS COUNTRY PUT OUT THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE THE BRITISH TRIED TO TAKE GUNS FROM THE AMERICAN CITIZENS. ANY TIME GOVERNMENTS TRY TO TAKE WEAPONS AWAY FROM ITS LAW ABIDING CITIZENS YOU KNOW WHATS COMING, EVEN IN THE UNITED STATES. RY
Comment by ROBERT MENZEL — February 16, 2013 @ 2:01 pm
Finally we are coming together and starting to push
back for our right hats off to all and respect to you
Comment by Mp-15 rules — February 16, 2013 @ 2:08 pm
I commend the companies that have the fortitude to fight back against the politicians who are trying to ambush our 2nd amendment rights. Thank you Olympic, LaRue and Cheaper Than Dirt. Let’s not forget McMillan Rifles in Phoenix, Arizona,….they no longer bank with Bank of America because of their position on the gun industry. (I called McMillan to verify the accuracy of this report)
Companies who resist the new anti gun legislations are going to be the companies that I do business with in the future. Let’s applaud and support businesses that support the 2nd amendment.
Ray Bertschy
Gunnison, Colorado
Comment by ray bertschy — February 16, 2013 @ 2:09 pm
It’s great to see that companies are taking the strong stand, iti may coast them some profits but hoplully will pay off in the end. I hope the sate government will see the folly in this, realise that besides it not having a effect on crime, it is hurting american jobs, american companies and the local economy. Let us not forget our history, or we will suffer the same mistakes. Feep fightign the just fight.
Comment by Richard K — February 16, 2013 @ 2:09 pm
I am glad to see these companies having the guts to stand up to states and federal goverment lawmakers who is trying to take away our second amendment rights. I support these companies and will make sure all my future purchases will be from one of these companies. Also, we would love to see any of them move to Arkansas.
Comment by Jerry Pschier — February 16, 2013 @ 2:12 pm
I would very encourage gun companies to leave unfriendly gun states and relocate where they are welcome. It’s sad to think that our congressmen, and senators forgot how they were put in office ,by the people ,for the people. We are putting them in office to enrich their lives,and follow teir own agenda. They are voted in to represent the represent the people who voted them into office. To work for us ,and not to imagine that we need to be ignored ,while they follow their own agenda,self serving as it is.Enforce the gun laws on the books ,and put mandatory time for gun crimes.Thanks
Comment by Steve Levenson — February 16, 2013 @ 2:21 pm
My parents emigrated to this country from lands where the types of freedoms we have, didn’t exist. My father is surely rolling over in his grave right now. My mother, who’s still alive to witness the travesty that is “our government,” can’t fathom how we got here, though all the “hallmarks” she grew up with are abundantly evident. Yes… I support these companies 150%. Move to Texas, where you will be welcomed and respected.
Comment by George — February 16, 2013 @ 2:27 pm
Find it funny that cheaper than dirt is on the second amendment side this time wasnt long ago they stop all sales of guns for what reason I dont know lol and then to back track on what they did at the time so I dont think there really on second amendment side there trying to be on there wallet side now
Comment by william — February 16, 2013 @ 2:29 pm
I support the company’s that will not sell to States that restrict the sell of gun’s to the public. What they need to do is inforcement of laws that are on the books. I am a corrections officer in washington st and I have seen convicted felons go in to walmart and other stores and by ammo even thow it is against federal law for them to sell to felons. I have contacted law inforcement about is and they say call the store management. I would like to see everyone call there state a.t.f and tell them to stop stores selling ammo to felons please. Thank you d.brown
Comment by david — February 16, 2013 @ 2:36 pm
I feel it’s an honorable thing these companies are doing, not seelling to LE if civilians can’t own the same item. If they receive too much flac in their state, come to Texas! We would appreciate the revenue and our business climate is much more easy to handle!
Comment by Steve — February 16, 2013 @ 2:38 pm
As a resident of California, I fully support manufacturers restricting sales to government agencies. I cannot blame a company for leaving a state that has an unfriendly environment – the loss of tax income going to unfriendly states is the penalty those states need to pay.
Unfortunately, many gun owners are also leaving these states which shifts the political views further toward anti-gun. This leads to more and more seats in congress shifting that direction as well. If that happens, these laws will be implemented on a national scale and then it won’t matter what state you moved to. Look at the history of how gun bans were implemmented in the UK and Australia. If you want to win a war you need to be willing to fight from the front lines rather than hiding in the rear.
Comment by Greg — February 16, 2013 @ 2:38 pm
I fully support these companies for their courageous stands and would love to see them relocate to my home state of Texas.
Comment by David — February 16, 2013 @ 2:44 pm
We the people appreciate what you are doing. United we can be heard. I have e-mailed walmart and expressed my feelings if they cave to the left. I will be glad to do business ONLY with the companies that take a stand. We all need to stand together.I applaud your brave effort. Eastern N.C. would love to have you here.
Comment by Mark Keplinger — February 16, 2013 @ 2:44 pm
I wish ammo manufacture would do the same thing! BRAVO!!!!!!!!!
Comment by ken — February 16, 2013 @ 2:53 pm
I am proud to say there are still patriots in the USA, after reading these articles and testimonials it confirms more than I had realized. Our freedoms and rights are all being attacked. The President and senate and congress have all empowered themselves with raises in times of great financial stress on all citizens. They are the killing American Hertiage our fathers and fore fathers fought for!
Comment by James Fitzgerald — February 16, 2013 @ 3:01 pm
I support all these companies for limiting to LE and other state government agencies ability to purchase only those items that the citizenry of those states are permitted to own. I wish that I had unlimited funds, I would purchase from each and every company doing this. Unfortunately I don’t have unlimited funds, however, I will support these companies over those that don’t impose these limits when making any future purchases. Now if we can get the ammo companies on board. I would like to see every ammo manufacturer tell the Department of Homeland Security that 1.6 BILLION rounds is quite enough and not sell them any more.
On a slightly different note. The gun grabbers have made some recent subtle changes in their verbiage. The most recent “Assault Weapons” ban is cleverly named the Gun Safety Bill. The Obama administration calls it efforts to ban guns “reducing Gun Violence.” They do this in order to make those of us who support The Second Amendment look bad. “Why would you as a responsible gun owner be against gun safety?” How could any law abiding American be FOR more violence? We need to call them out on this. The weapons ban has nothing to do with gun safety! Obama’s proposed legislation has nothing to do with reducing violence.
Comment by Britt Dixon — February 16, 2013 @ 3:07 pm
I salute all of these businesses. I wish that we could get one hundred percent of them to do this. I am sure Texas would welcome all of these folks that are looking for a friendlier atmoshpere. The ammunition manufacturers should do the same. That is what the Federal government is doing to the public now, with their exceptionaly large ammuntion orders.
Comment by Al Regini — February 16, 2013 @ 3:10 pm
I live in Albany New York and am one of many of the thousands of New Yorkers who feel that the new gun laws that were pushed thru in the middle of the night are totally unfair. I am so glad to see that there are gun/ammo manufacturers that are taking on the fight to help support the 2nd amendment. I will do all that I can to support those companies that support us. I just hope that the pending litigation in New York will appeal the back door liberal gun laws that were just enacted. With the help of the NRA and the NYSRPA we will fight. I hope everyone out there that owns a gun and enjoys the sport will support one of the gun rights organizations so they can keep on fighting.
Comment by Tom — February 16, 2013 @ 3:12 pm
I absolutely agree with companies that want to restrict sales to any state or other jurisdiction that restricts their citizens right to own firearms that their own agents carry/assigned. I would not want individual law enforcement officer’s to suffer but they must, as individuals, take a stand against violating the second amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The first item of any oath of office is generally agreed to be the most important. I know the first part of mine and almost all other law enforcement oaths is as follows: ” I swear to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States …” I encourage any companies that want to relocate their business and/or employees to consider Florida. Low taxes and at least for now, a legislature that supports the U.S. Constitution.
Comment by Wallace Dill — February 16, 2013 @ 3:24 pm
Nevada! Nevada! Nevada! This is the state that welcomes freedom. This is the place where the citizenry supports and practicies 2nd amendment rights. Our state is a business freindly state. This is where you can open and run a successful business.Low taxes and operating costs.
Nevada welcomes and needs businesses to come to our great, freedom loving state. Hope to see you open your business here soon!
Comment by Dan — February 16, 2013 @ 3:25 pm
Welcome to the Commonwealth of Kentucky where we always welcome new business.
Comment by Steve — February 16, 2013 @ 3:27 pm
As they say in Texas “It’s like a whole other country”. They can pick the climate, scenery, and population center they want and never worry about state gun laws infinging on their business.
Comment by Mobius — February 16, 2013 @ 3:29 pm
Hey woody since you mention you will be speaking to the NRA and NSSF, maybe these organization and other gun manufacturers would be willing to petition ATK and respectfully request that ATK rescind the federal government’s orders for hollow point ammunition. In the minds of law abiding citizens the government doesn’t need enough ammo to run the Iraq war for another 15 years. Not to mention that ammo is banned for use in combat by NATO. DHS does not need it and ATK shouldnt fill it. The situation will calm down and cooler heads prevail once DHS stops the panic buying
Comment by bartjoebob — February 16, 2013 @ 3:33 pm
I fully support these companies. As a New Yorker, I hope Remington realizes ,soon, that this state is not worthy of their products, their jobs and their tax dollers. Our rights are under full attack from all sides. I pray that all firearm manufacturers, ammo manufacturers and accessory manufacturers do the same. As the anti-gun, anti-freedom president says:”everyone needs to have skin in the game”. Everyone needs to do everything they can possibly do. I, for the 1st time since I have been able to hunt and fish, will not be buying any sporting licenses in NY. I am fortunate, as much as someone can be, who has just been made a felon by it’s state,as I live in a good county on the state border. We are going to buy as much as we can on-line and across the border, thus denying NY of sales tax. Will it cost me money? Yes. Will people lose their jobs? Unfortunately, yes. Will my taxes go up due to loss of manufacturing jobs? Yes. Will it be a hassle? Yes. But, it needs to be done.
Comment by Leigh Bennett — February 16, 2013 @ 3:39 pm
Hats off and a big salute to all those courageous manufacturers! The left continues to promote the deception that the 2nd amendment is about preserving the right to own sporting/hunting arms. We all know it’s about our right to resist a tyrannical government. It’s obvious the would-be tyrants want to out-gun us. Connect the dots: NSA monitoring every form of electronic communication; drones next and fed agencies stockpiling billions of rounds of ammo. Stand up now or the game is over.
Comment by TLB — February 16, 2013 @ 3:40 pm
I greatly admire the decision of firearm manfacturers and associated products manufactures to relocate to more business friendly states and to restrict LE and government agencies from purchasing any of their products that the civilian market cannot purchase. I will continue monitoring this trend and will target those companies that make such decisions for my future purchases, FOR EVER. I think this is a good opportunity for such companies to build a larger and more loyal customer base. I especially hope that all ammo manufacturing companies will follow suit by restricting LE and govermental agencies from purchasing their products. I find it curious that the federal government needs 1.6 billion rounds of ammo while at the same time beginning their battle to disarm the american public.
Comment by Harry Willis — February 16, 2013 @ 3:40 pm
The government is supposed to be working for us but they think they know what is good for us. I am sick and tired of stupid politicians telling me how to live my life. If you dont win at the elections you can definately win with your feet or your wallet. Cut the states off that are for the POLITICAL GOOD OF THE PEOPLE. The people of this country have more power than they realize. The people need to exercise their power. Dont buy from companies that are ANTI-2nd Amendment. It will take time but the results will take effect. I will support any and all companies that support the 2nd Amendment and the freedon of the American people to live their lives as they want. GOD BLESS AMERICA AND OUR FREEDOM.
Comment by H.L. Burge — February 16, 2013 @ 3:42 pm
I whole heartadly support and agree with the stance taken by LaRue, Olympic Arms, and Cheaper then Dirt in this effort to stand against Big Brother and it`s authorizing agents which amounts to at the least, “fair play” This is like nobody buying gas for one week to put the oil companies in check! It`s great to see businesses putting morals ahead of profits. God Bless these companies. Now, if we could only get the people to stand together as well in this fight against tyranny we might have a chance. I see the fall of this great nation comming SOON if we don`t ALL take action NOW! We must make a stand against this cancer that calls itself our “government”! The time for revolution is at hand, I`m sorry to say. Freedom is NOT free and sometimes calls for the blood of patriots.
Comment by Bigmag47 — February 16, 2013 @ 4:05 pm
Bravo! Please come manufacture your procu t’s in Louisiana. We are gun friendly here!
Comment by David carver — February 16, 2013 @ 4:05 pm
This is a really great idea and fantastic news. As a gun owner, I want to get involved. As gun retailers, you ARE getting involved. The more we unite, the stronger we become. The more information we have, the smarter we become. We need to become organized, united and speak with one voice. WE are the people. Bad govt. wins if GOOD men do nothing.
Comment by E C — February 16, 2013 @ 4:16 pm
I have decided that I will no longer do business with any company that voluntarily implements compliance with any new gun law before it goes into effect. e.g. Dicks Sporting Goods in NC.
Comment by Charles Newman — February 16, 2013 @ 4:32 pm
Benjamin Franlklin said as they were signing the Declaration of Independence “Either we hang together or we will certainly all hang separately”. This is one of those times.
Comment by David — February 16, 2013 @ 4:34 pm
I would like a list of companies with that mindset so I can do business with them as opposed to those that cowtow to the these states that thisnk law abiding means criminal activity. Sure wish they would do the same for the feds.
Comment by Dennis Thomas — February 16, 2013 @ 4:34 pm
I appreciate very much the stand that these companies are taking and I would encourage other companies to do the same. Most people have respect for those who will stand up, be counted, and do the right thing.
Comment by Don in Oklahoma — February 16, 2013 @ 4:45 pm
I agree with the companys moving and not selling to gun control states or gov agents and I will support them all I can by buying there products.
We need to take a stand now before it’s to late, read the article in the link below.
NRA,TP,OK
http://libertycrier.com/u-s-constitution/revitalization-of-the-state-militias/?utm_source=The+Liberty+Crier&utm_campaign=f9c1a7d8e5-The_Liberty_Crier_Daily_News_2_16_2013&utm_medium=email
Comment by exlogger — February 16, 2013 @ 4:45 pm
CTD you should also stop supporting amunition companies from the antigun states, I have aleady dropped them from my purchasing list and shifted to Remington, Hornady. They sold out to the Fed Agencies causing a shortage, and our money will still end up in their tax coffers, once the contract runs out they will feel the pinch. Ruger already has a vacility in Prescott AZ hope they move the rest of it there.
Comment by Richard — February 16, 2013 @ 4:48 pm
If America does not stand up right now and tell congress how they feel, then roll over and take in the behind. I’ve fired letters off left and right letting them know how I feel. DO THE SAME!!! I have a manufacturer FFL and I’m out of business before I open my door…Where are we headed, dictatorship to the extreme, the monkeys in DC is getting what they want, a ruling thumb. The difference between Obama and Hitler, the spelling…
Comment by Jerry sinor — February 16, 2013 @ 4:55 pm
I could not agree more and say thank you to any and all of these companies that also take a stand for our rights. I fully support each and everyone one of them, and we all need to stand side by side to protect our rights. Myself and all gun owners likewise need to make sure we are at the voting booths for all future elections as well. 100 Million of us can sure make our rights will be protected in the future also.
Comment by Bill — February 16, 2013 @ 5:23 pm
All manufacturers are welcome to relocate to Kansas, gun friendly and centrally located.
Comment by Joe — February 16, 2013 @ 5:24 pm
all the manufacture’s need to pack up and move here to North Carolina…We have plenty of skilled folks looking for work, a great all around climate, not so bad taxes, but most of all, North Carolinians respect and uphold and believe in the second amendment.. Come on down ya’ll, we’d love to have ya..
Comment by charles — February 16, 2013 @ 5:26 pm
I think the actions by these gun manufactures to deny law enforcement agencies access to weapons that are otherwise banned to the general public is a not well thought out knee jerk reaction. Law enforcement agencies have been outgunned for years, and now the gun companies are going to make it even tougher for them to do their job. Shame on them. These actions do nothing to contribute to a healthy dialogue toward reducing gun violence.
Comment by Doug Baker — February 16, 2013 @ 5:31 pm
I am outraged that I, along with countless other law abiding, taxpaying, respectable citizens are being made to be scapegoats for a weak criminal justice system that allows scum to have more rights than us. Depriving us of our rights will do nothing to stop crime. We need to speak clearly in the voting booth.
Comment by Al Flitcroft — February 16, 2013 @ 5:33 pm
Great idea. I’ll support any company that supports gun owners. I live in Connecticut and would love to move out of here myself.
Comment by Tom Hines — February 16, 2013 @ 5:34 pm
Companies should go one step further and not manufacture Hi-Cap for the U.S. military if the rights of Hi-Cap to U.S. citizens are infringed upon. Watch it then as the Federal Government rears it’s ugly head and uses it’s heavy hand to take over those companies.
Comment by William Sowell — February 16, 2013 @ 5:38 pm
Simply stated “ Bravo “ to all the company’s that have taken this stance. Thank You !!!!
Comment by Daniel Boone — February 16, 2013 @ 5:44 pm
Hats off to these companies and CTD! As a New Yorker, I am against the law, and its requirements for AR registration, 1 year to destroy, surrender to law enforcement, or sell out of state pre ban High cap magazines, Finally no more that 7 rounds in a mag.
Comment by Bob — February 16, 2013 @ 5:47 pm
I am glad to hear that all the different firearm companies are standing up to the Government. You are more than welcome to bring all you business to TEXAS. You will find that this is the state to open your business. Here we are against all the crap that is being spread across the rest of the country, and we will not bend to their laws, or rules. Thanks for standing up to them. Now if you will refuse to sell all your ammo to them and say if there is not enough to sell to our customers then we will no longer sell to the Government. It is not right that they buy it all up and we have none to buy.
Comment by david dixon — February 16, 2013 @ 5:53 pm
Bring your firearms businesses to Texas, where you will be welcomed with open arms. Thanks for standing up to the so call Government and sayiing that you will no longer sell to them if the law bidding people are not allowed to own.
Comment by david dixon — February 16, 2013 @ 5:57 pm
Absolutely Fantastic!! We need to have ALL companies in this industry follow this lead. We CAN win this battle if we all are willing to fight. Thanks to all for your efforts.
Comment by Okie Bob — February 16, 2013 @ 6:13 pm
Thanks to the gun manufacturers that are supporting the 2nd amendment rights of the law abiding citizen. Don’t sell to those states that pass restrictive gun laws.
Move out of those unfrienly states, vote with your feet.
Citizens, get behing these friendly companies helping to protect our rights.
Become a member & Join the NRA NOW! Don’t wait until it is too late. Make your voice heard with the rest of us.
God Bless!
Comment by Jerry — February 16, 2013 @ 6:19 pm
I live in new york and I hate all these new laws I will support any company that will not sell to our government agency if I can’t have what they have then f**k them.
Comment by alex — February 16, 2013 @ 6:19 pm
I applaud these companies and will support them with my purchases. It’s time for the ammo manufacturers to cancel the Department of Homeland securities order for millions of rounds. Continue to sell to our military branches but not the other Federal Agencies that show support for the bans.
This is a better response than during the previous GUN Ban, when colt industries only sold to LE/Military and discontinued sales to civilians. Citizens have supported the gun and related industries for centuries, it’s good to see that these industries are now supporting us.
Comment by Jom Boggess — February 16, 2013 @ 6:22 pm
I say West Virginia where it is still an open carry state. As a veteran I feel it is a slap in the face of all vets who served so that our freedoms and rights were protected, that any state or municipality would strip those rights from its citizens. I am moving this year to a state that believes in its citizens rights to bear arms. I also vow to boycott any company that I find selling guns to any city, state, or federal agency that restricts the rights of lawful gun owners.
Comment by Mike Miller — February 16, 2013 @ 6:35 pm
It’s becoming easier to see the division that obama the “unifier” thrives on. The fraud of an election and the F&F debacle that holder lied his ass off about, the Benghazi lies, the way he turns people against each other and all the while acting like he has nothing to do with it. His goal of destroying this country is dividing the citizenry with BS and falsehoods. Punishing those who stand upright and produce while talking crap about them to the people with a handful of gimme and no thanks. I still can’t figure out why it is okay to kill babies, but they want to strip law abiding people of their rights because some sick bastard wants to kill children. Could it be TYRANNY PREVENTION? Another double standard. Do they or do they not care about children? The bible says “in the end days wrong will become right and right becomes wrong”. The socialist, commies in the white house now are making sure of it without even knowing what they’re doing.I applaud those companies making a stand, and I’m sure many more will be jumping on board too. I hope so anyway. God save us.
Praise God and pass the ammunition.
Comment by Russ Z — February 16, 2013 @ 6:45 pm
I fully support what these companies are doing and would encurage all ammo suppliers to do the same thing. If you can’t get ammo your arms are usless. Have you tried to buy ammo lately. I will continue to support these companies and any others that get on the (ban) wagon. Stick together or go down 1 at a time.
Comment by David Hazlet — February 16, 2013 @ 6:47 pm
I support the companies. But as a California resident, I fear it will be a loss to no longer have them helping (as much) to fight the anti- gun politicians in Sacramento. As a businessman, I understand completely. California has driven many businesses away. Most car parts warehouses moved to Reno because CA instituted an inventory tax. GM’s parts warehouse used to be in Oakland, I guess they don’t need jobs there..
Comment by David Pozzi — February 16, 2013 @ 7:03 pm
This is my second post. I too hope the momentum continues, and all firearm companies get involved, but please quit sounding like a bunch of real-estate salesmen or politicians trying to get new business to move to your area, that’s not what is important now. What good is it for them to move to a friendly local government if the Federal government steps on them like a roach. More important than jobs, are freedom. Want to be like those countries fighting their government like Syria, Egypt and others?
Comment by Ed — February 16, 2013 @ 7:04 pm
Federal, state and local governments are trying to do a beatdown on law-abiding gun-owning citizens. Obama, Cuomo, O’Malley and others can’t believe that gun owners are uniting at a grassroots level and willl do a bully beatdown on them. It is proof that the American spirit that made us a great nation is still alive and well.
Comment by Randy Farmer — February 16, 2013 @ 7:07 pm
The battle now will be between the welcoming, pro-gun states to get them to locate to our locations. I have shopped with Cheaper Than Dirt for a while, and they have sealed a grateful loyalty to their brand from me with this stand. Should they desire to come to NC, there would be appreciation on both sides, I guarantee you. You will NEVER see any of these great companies treated so disrespectfully here, We The People of NC simply would not tolerate it! Y’all come on down, y’hear!
Comment by Daryl Baker — February 16, 2013 @ 7:11 pm
My hats off to these Companies. ATK has absorbed a large portion of the Ammunition Market and certainly needs to pr proactive or their sale are going to go down the tank. I myself am an avid gun owner and proud of that, even after having been shot by a .30-.30 as a teenager. I do not feel restricting guns is the solution, I would support stiffer penalties for crimes involving weapons of any kind.
Comment by Carl Terranella — February 16, 2013 @ 7:11 pm
I’m glad to see some companies with the balls to make a stand! It’d be funny to see cops in CA with bullet buttons and 10 round mags!
Comment by Tanner — February 16, 2013 @ 7:14 pm
We need someone to organize us. The three branches of gov’t will not stand up for us no matter how we vote. Obama is acting like he has the only vote. I praise the companies that have taken a stand for the people. The people have put them where they are and they seem to appreciate this fact. Texas is a wonderful place to do business and raise a family. Only our liberal cities of austin and san antonio use their progressiveness against their citizens. I will use more discrimination in ordering in the future. A list of our confederates would help all of us make these choices. Thank you for your stands and GOD Bless
Comment by C W Hunk — February 16, 2013 @ 7:18 pm
As a law enforcement officer I too support these companies and their efforts to fight back. I only wish that more manufacturer and suppliers would follow their lead. To any company that is looking to relocate please consider Indiana we would love to have you.
Comment by Scott — February 16, 2013 @ 7:31 pm
I fully support the decision by Gun and accessory manufactures to halt sales to LE organizations within California, New York, and any other state that does not support the second amendment of our Constitution. Every one of the government officials has sworn an oath to support the Constitution not to subvert it. It is time to help them remember their oath. Last year I moved out of California because of the restrictive government. I encourage any manufacturing company to consider moving to states that continue to support the Constitution. It is also time to vote all of the lying politicians out of office. If they like gun control so much they should move to Russia where they will fit right in.
Comment by Bones Spalding — February 16, 2013 @ 7:34 pm
Absolutely! I feel we are slowly being driven into a Have vs Have-not society. Building more prisons and such to house those that don’t have, take their guns away, then lock them up. What’s left is those millionaires & billionaires being the only ones out and free to buy congress and others into those at the lower end of the totem pole. Doesn’t anyone else see this coming?
Comment by Jamie B — February 16, 2013 @ 7:47 pm
They should all move down here to Texas.
We respect the 2nd and The Constitution.
Of course, except for our moonbats in Austin (Moscow on the Colorado) and Dallas.
Comment by R Daneel — February 16, 2013 @ 7:47 pm
I fully support the “push back” measures taken by these manufacturers and dealers. I would believe Gov. Scott would welcome any business that wanted to move their operations here to Florida. There are a lot of good people here that would appreciate the jobs. As stated above, I think the ammo companies should ban sales of their products in stated that prohibit their citizens from exercising their full 2nd Amendment rights.
As a society, how can we allow this tyranny by the Progressives to tell us what is good for us and what we are allowed to do?
Comment by Mickey Delancy — February 16, 2013 @ 7:50 pm
South Dakota will welcome gun industries with open arms. Great work ethic, few unions, low taxes ( no state income tax) great hunting and shooting facilities. Come on out!
Comment by George Bogenschutz — February 16, 2013 @ 7:54 pm
I agree with any firearm and accessory manufacturer that will not sell to agenceys
in areas that sales are restricted to civilians. I have never been more disinchanted with this countries leadership as I am now. This country was founded on a government with checks and balances. Obama continues to do an end run around all of that. I have never seen a leadership that holds its citizens in such contempt. What does any agency,government,etc. have to fear in a law abiding citizen armed? We have more to fear in being unarmed with our current leadership.
Comment by Bobby Wright — February 16, 2013 @ 7:59 pm
I fully support all of the efforts listed here, and will support these folks all I can. It would be nice to have a list of the companies taking a stand to support now and when this is over. As far as I know, these manufactures are more than welcome in Arkansas and will continue to be. We would love to have the jobs.
terp
Comment by John Terpening — February 16, 2013 @ 8:00 pm
As a ret PO in NY state, I applaud all the companys taking these actions. NY state acted like a thief in the night sneaking this law through. They didn’t even exclude their own PO’s from the mag restriction. I’d like to see every gun/ammo/accessories supplier in the country join them in refusing to sell them such products. You are the real patriots. Keep it up.
Comment by Tony C — February 16, 2013 @ 8:03 pm
I am thankful for my 2nd amendment rights. To protect my home, my family and against government that won’t protect me (LA riots) when all hell breaks out. Cops pulled back and didn’t even protect citizens as we watched Reginald Denny get beaten to a pulp. And where is what’s his name? At the bottome of the pool. Did we forget?
Comment by jay — February 16, 2013 @ 8:03 pm
Great article. I fully support any entity pushing back at oppression and ignorance. Id love to see these companies move and take their jobs and tax revenues with them! Doesnt change the dissapointment I have in CTD and others for obvious price gouging. I had to stop shopping with them when even Cabelas pricing is much lower than theirs now.
Comment by david kuck — February 16, 2013 @ 8:06 pm
DPMS-Welcome to the republic of Texas
Comment by Soldtonorm — February 16, 2013 @ 8:09 pm
I believe that we as consumers could also pledge that we would no longer do business with any company that still sells to these government agencies! Hit them in the pocket book.
Comment by Russell — February 16, 2013 @ 8:09 pm
I applaud all of the companies that have made a stand for the Second Amendment. Any of the companies that are considering moving to a more gun favorable state, South Carolina would love to have you here. If you move here and find you are in need of employees, I am available after March 2013.
Comment by Spirit — February 16, 2013 @ 8:21 pm
If the ammo company’s join in this we can win
Comment by powers — February 16, 2013 @ 8:26 pm
Alabama will gladly accept all the gun, ammunition, and shooting accessory companies that would like to relocate to our great state. We welcome them with open “arms”.
Thanks,
A very concerned citizen.
Comment by JB in BAMA — February 16, 2013 @ 8:28 pm
move to ARIZONA this is a prop gun sae
Comment by powers — February 16, 2013 @ 8:28 pm
Kudos to folks like you who have a grasp on what’s at stake. In the last two generations, Americans have become soft and timid and as long as they can get their morning latte with two spritzes of cinnamon on the way to their fashion shoot, they don’t care about what makes our country strong. As a retired army guy and Vietnam vet I stood up. It galls me to find that most of the people that are anti-gun have never held a gun…. they are scared of them because they go “bang.” They blame the gun for every incident of evil…. It’s not the tool, it’s the fool. In a DUI highway accident, the car is never at fault for the deaths of innocent people, yet when a shooting occurs it’s always… THE GUN.
I applaud your stance, and other companies. If we lose the Second Amendment, we’ll soon lose The First…..
Dan Shew
North Carolina
Comment by Dan Shew — February 16, 2013 @ 8:30 pm
Great job Cheaper Than Dirt, Olympic Arms, LaRue Tactical and any other firm with the guts to stand up to these repressive state governments! This policy is nothing short of brilliant and I applaud you for making such a bold statement. I am going to personally commit to supporting any company which stands by the Second Ammendment and the American People by looking at them first for all future purchases.
South Carolina is Manufacturing and gun freindly and would welcome any of these patriotic companies with open arms and a willing, capable work force.
Thank you!!!
Comment by David Scull — February 16, 2013 @ 8:54 pm
EVERY single firearms manufacturer, ammunition manufacturer, body armor manufacturer, etc (anything related to firearms) needs to NOT sell to any state that is restricting our 2nd Amendment Rights. If the police in NY (especially the ones in NYC and Nanny Bloombergs bodyguards) cannot get ammo and body guards, THAT WOULD SEND A CLEAR MESSAGE that “We the people” are tired of this crap and the moronic politicians NEED TO FOLLOW THEIR OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA – PERIOD. That would also make more ammo available to us citizens in 2nd Amendment States
.
Comment by 2nd Ammendment Patriot — February 16, 2013 @ 8:58 pm
The Great State of Nebraska supports every company that remains solid to our traditions and the Constitution. I am fortunate to live in an all Republican Conservative state where the leadership supports the family and traditional values of its citizens. As our sign says, when you visit us, “The Good Life”. Family and tradition is strong in our state and I welcome everyone to move here and enjoy our prosperity.
Comment by Donald Bolt — February 16, 2013 @ 9:05 pm
I live in New York and love my state, however I will gladly take the fine or be arrested for owning and shooting my, legally purchased, AR. It takes being harmed by a law in order to fight a law in court. This is not a discreationary new piece of legislation, it is a chipping away of our personal freedoms guarenteed by the Constitution that I personally defended during my time served as an infantryman. For those companies expressing their distaste to these unconstitutional laws I applaude and support you, you have a faithfull customer. For those like minded to my way of thinking, don’t be bullied, don’t accept what our ELECTED representatives are doing. Fight back with the best weapon we have, our vote. Contact your senators, contact your representatives and let them know that your vote will determine their future and their future depends on how they personally defend our God given freedoms afforded to us in the Constitution.
Comment by Brett Wheeler — February 16, 2013 @ 9:10 pm
Wow! this is about the greatest idea I have seen yet for making both the goose and the gander part of the same sauce! YES, YES, YES, I will support companies taking the fight into the living rooms of the panderers of gun control chaos. We in New Mexico are facing the same wave of “me too, me too” political knee-jerking. I understand fully the business reasons for such moves, but I also feel satisfaction in my gut from such moves against such draconian moves as have been recently spawned by the Obama administration. All I can say is, “You go, guys. You rock!”
SUBMITTED BY HENRY SERVATT, NEW MEXICO SHEEPDOG (R.E.D)
Comment by Henry Servatt — February 16, 2013 @ 9:15 pm
The manufacturers boycotting certain cities and states is all well and good but we can’t rely on them to cut their profits alone. We’ve got to do our part and vote out the politicians who pass these bills in to law. There has to be a massive ousting of the fools who would take away our God given rights or it won’t work. It will just mean bankrupt manufacturers and citizens without guns and ammo.
Comment by EdH — February 16, 2013 @ 9:18 pm
Thank you Woody. If you work for CTD and have some free time could you setup and maintain a page that would allow us to send a ‘thank you’ email to all these companies?
Comment by Jason — February 16, 2013 @ 9:25 pm
I fully support these companies and their decisions, and I hope the ammo manufactures jump on board too.
One of the only good things our governor has done is make the statement, “Come to Texas, you will be welcome”. He was talking about companies wanting to relocate to non-union states, but I am sure that also extends to MagPul and other firearm companies and firearm related companies. I am sure that San Angelo, Abilene, or other small Texas cities would welcome DPMS if they want to move to a better business climate.
Comment by Mark — February 16, 2013 @ 9:25 pm
I salute those companies that refuse to sell to the goverment and other departments I have been in Law Enforcement going on 40 years, I support the Constitution not the goverment
Comment by c. cook — February 16, 2013 @ 9:36 pm
I stand by all these companies for defending our rights as citizens to protect ourselves from the bad elements in our government and our society. Please move all of your companies to Wyoming, we beleive in our Freedom. My wife and I have made a list of all the states that have decided it’s okay to stomp on our freedoms and will Not be buying any products from businesses within those states that do not defend our freedoms. Maybe if it starts effecting their pocket books, they will realize this is about much more than a simple firearm issue and they will start getting the problem people OUT of office. It’s time for compamies like Cabelas and the Bass Pro Shop to join the ranks of the people that have helped build their companies. Thank You to all the compamies that are standing up for us! Keep going your not alone.
Comment by Terry Keslar — February 16, 2013 @ 9:42 pm
All manufactures should do what these other companies are doing. If private citizens can not buy or own these products then the different types of governments agencies should not either. All you companies keep up the good work. Move here to PA. We have passed a law that we will not enforce any federal laws passed.
Comment by Derik — February 16, 2013 @ 9:56 pm
My hat is off to the manufacturers and dealers alike that will support our second ammendment rights. I’d like to see some of these businesses and manufacturers come to Arizona. This is the toughest fight that 2nd ammendment supporters have faced in my 50yrs. Obama and this administration need to stop using children as human sheilds and give the vote back to the people, along with the rights that they’ve already stripped from us.
Comment by George — February 16, 2013 @ 9:58 pm
How about if S&W, Colt, Ruger? It time to for all gun related companies to stop doing business with NY, CA, CT, NJ. If their gun laws are so good, then the police do not need guns as well.
Start writing letters to the manufacturers’ and suppliers such as Brownell, Midway to stop as well.
Comment by Duane Perry — February 16, 2013 @ 10:15 pm
I agaree 100% and will only do business with Companys that that inact the same for all, also any Politician that took the oath to Defend and up hold the Constitution of the United States, and votes or inacts any policy against it should be arrested and tried as a Terrorist against the people of the United States and be Terninated from ever holding public office and taged as Terrorist just like a communist.
Comment by Kenneth Prewitt — February 16, 2013 @ 10:16 pm
I admire these companies! Another assault against firearms owners has been undertake by Groupon. They have stopped offering “Groupons” for any firearms related businesses. I encourage everyone to let their friends know, to email Groupon, and to use social media to let people know. My message to Groupon was simple: “Until you return to respecting private businesses that offer firearms related products and services, my family will not do business with Groupon.”
Comment by Dave White — February 16, 2013 @ 10:27 pm
I like this idea a will support it even though it may have a negative impact on me. I work in law enforcement in the state of Maryland. I would like to be exempt from the strict gun control laws of this state but it is very dangerous place when you allow this to happen. This sets up an environment where law enforcement officers can begin thinking that laws do not apply to them and the citizenry distrust law enforcement. A nation where government officials play by different rules than the folks they say they are serving.
I work very closely with the Troopers in the state of Maryland and the majority of them do not agree with the handgun concealed carry laws in the state. They fully understand that these so called assault weapons are not the problem and will do nothing to keep the guns out of the hands of people who wish to do evil. I say this because it seems like some of the posting lump the law enforcement officer in with our legislatures and nothing could be further from the truth.
When a Trooper gives an opinion as a Trooper it must be the opinion or stance of the agency in this case the Superintendent. The Superintendent is appointed by the Governor and the governor tells the superintendent what his public opinion will be.
Comment by johnnie Law — February 16, 2013 @ 10:44 pm
Wow my next AR will be an Olympic arms all my business will go to cheaper than dirt way to go
Comment by Frank — February 16, 2013 @ 10:45 pm
The Aimes Shovel Company of Massachusetts was the first gun manufacture in America
during the 1760′s. They inspired the fight for freedom with their secret production of gun barrels under the cover of night. The gun became a symbol of freedom, then and now
“…being necessary to the security of a free state…” Its not that we should have a
right to own guns, its for us to be free, we must have guns to secure that freedom, it
is not a right as much as it is a responsibility to maintain our freedom. The militia stands guard not against foreign invaders, but stands guard against those who want to
take freedom away to gain power and control over the people. The people have responded
by purchasing millions of guns in the past few months. The gun manufactures of America
must lead not to save the jobs of workers, but to save the freedom of the workers.
Comment by R. Zeka — February 16, 2013 @ 10:49 pm
Thank you LaRue, Olympic, and CTD! Let’s hope their bold resolve spreads throughout the industry. Those of us whom you’ve chosen to stand up for, will not forget you. It’s gratifying to see companies willing to risk sales and profits to support a higher priciple. I wonder if we would see this from any other industry? Not likely. I know I’m not alone in pledgeing my support, and my business, to these companies and others like them, who may follow their lead in the future. Thanks again.
Comment by Sam Branch — February 16, 2013 @ 11:06 pm
I urge all ammo companies stop selling all ammo to any govt. agency federal, state and local who are trampling on our 2nd. amendment rights. Move here to Tennessee where we love our guns. I have written one of my state legislators (He is a Tea Party favorite) to get on a plane and fly up to Connecticut, Mass. and N.H. and urge the gun and ammo companies to move there operations to a 2nd. amendment friendly state. We do however have to get rid of our Rhino Governor who seems to waffle a lot.
Comment by Raymond Kopp — February 16, 2013 @ 11:13 pm
I salute the companies taking a stand and I hope many more do the same. I love my country, sorry I can’t say the same about the government. It’s very sad that all the law abiding citizens should be punished for the actions of the few while all the politicians making these laws don’t have to abide by them.
Comment by Richard Culak — February 16, 2013 @ 11:25 pm
I RESPECT ALL COMPANYS AND PEOPLE WHO WILL STAND UP FOR OUR 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS. THE PEOPLE OF OUR GREAT NATION THAT HAVEN’T WOKE UP TO WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING IN OUR COUNTRY NEED TO DO SO AND ANY OF US THAT CAN HELP OTHERS TO UNDERSTAND OUR RIGHTS AND WHAT THIS ADMINISTRATION AND THE LIBERALS ARE REALLY WANTING TO DO SHOULD TRY TO EDUCATE OTHERS TO UNDERSTAND. THE GOVERMENT & LIBERALS ARE TRYING TO SELL TO THE PUBLIC THAT WHEN THE 2ND AMENDMENT MENTIONS THE MILITIA,IT MEANT THE ARMY OF THAT PERIOD OR TODAY IT WOULD BE THE NATIONAL GUARD,WRONG, WE HAD A STANDING ARMY LEAD BY GEORGE WASHINGTON AND THE MILITIA WAS ORDINARY CITIZENS LIKE US TODAY WHO THE STANDING ARMY WOULD CALL UPON WHEN NEEDED TO HELP FIGHT AND AFTER A BATTLE THEY (MILITIA) WOULD RETURN TO THEIR HOMES AND FAMILIES AND BACK TO BEING A FARMER, TAVERN KEEPER,BLACKSMITH,ETC. ETC. JOHN RANDOLF TUCKER,DEAN OF A LAW SCHOOL,A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR,THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA WROTE IN 1899 THAT THE SECOND AMENDMENT INDICATES THE NEED THAT THE SECURITY OF LIBERTY AGAINST THE TYRANNICAL TENDENCY OF GOVERNMENT IS ONLY TO BE FOUND IN THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS IN RESISTING THE WRONGS OF GOVERNMENT. TO UNDERSTAND THE TRUE MEANING OF THE 2ND AMENDMENT,ONE MUST GO BACK IN TIME TO SEE WHAT OUR FOUNDING FATHERS FELT AND THE THOUGHT PROCESS AT THE TIME. THERE IS POWER IN KNOWLEDGE AND I WOULD RECOMMEND TO EVERYONE OUT THERE THAT TRUELY BELEIVES IN THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO PURCHASE THE BOOK “THE SECOND AMENDMENT,BY DAVID BARTON” ON EBAY OR LOCAL BOOKSTORE. YOU WILL GAIN A GREAT DEAL OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THIS BOOK AND IT WILL HELP YOU TO DEFEND WHAT YOU BELEIVE, IN REGARDS TO OUR RIGHTS TO OWN AND BEAR ARMS. GOD BLESS THIS NATION AND EACH OF YOU WHO STAND FOR FREEDOM AND WHAT IS RIGHT,AND WHO WILL TRY TO SPREAD THE TRUTH BECAUSE IT ISN’T BEING TAUGHT IN OUR SCHOOLS ANY LONGER.GEORGE WASHINGTON SAID”A FREE PEOPLE OUGHT TO BE ARMED. NO MAN SHOULD SCRUPLE OR HESITATE A MOMENT TO USE ARMS IN DEFENSE. NOAH WEBSTER,BEFORE A STANDING ARMY CAN RULE,THE PEOPLE MUST BE DISARMED-AS THEY ARE IN ALMOST EVERY KINGDOM IN EUROPE.
THE MILITIA ACT OF 1792 DEFINED “MILITIA OF THE UNITED STATES” NOT AS THE CONTINENTAL ARMY OR ANY OTHER ORGANIZED MILITARY BODY BUT RATHER AS INCLUDING ALMOST EVERY ADULT MALE IN THE UNITED SYATES. UNDER THAT ACT,EACH ADULT WAS REQUIRED-BY LAW-TO POSSESS A FIREARMANDA MINIMUM SUPPLY OF AMMUNITION AND MILITARY EQUIPMENT.
A MILITIA–ARE IN FACT THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES…AND ARE FOR THE MOST PART EMPLOYED AT HOME IN THEIR PRIVATE CONCERNS..RICHARD HENERY LEE, SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION AND FRAMER OF THE 2ND AMENDMENT.
THE MILITIA IS COMPOSED OF FREE CITIZENS…SAMUEL ADAMS,SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION.
Comment by MIKE MAYNARD — February 16, 2013 @ 11:33 pm
It’s great for the companies to stand up for the public whom supports them, but it’s not good they are moving. Relocation is a slippery slope toward becoming cornered.
Comment by Johnny5 — February 16, 2013 @ 11:39 pm
I totally support the strong position of LaRue Tactical that it will only sell to local LE agencies what civilians in a given jurisdiction are allowed to own!!
Our opposition is rutheless and extreme, and we must make a hard stand right now. Any gun manufacturer that continues selling to LE’s in a state that is doing what they are doing in California and New York ought to be ashamed, and as consumers we should make them pay for that decision.
I intend to support LaRue.
Hold tight, we have a long way to go on this one!
Comment by J Soneff — February 17, 2013 @ 12:17 am
I agree with these companies wanting to pull them from the states that want to take our 2nd Amendment rights away. We need to stand together and fight for our rights.Thank you Cheaper Than Dirt for keeping us informed.
Comment by Ron Shaw — February 17, 2013 @ 12:41 am
I completely support those companies that are taking a stand for law abiding citizens that simply enjoy and act on their right to own firearms and firearm accessories of their choice. I really hope all manufacturers follow suit and let govt and state agencies know that we are sick of all the stupidity and regulations that have no effect and make no sense. I was born and have lived my whole life in cali and can tell you I and my family and my business am looking for the very first opportunity to get out of this overpopulated idiotic nonsensicle state full of liberal dumbshits.
Comment by mike — February 17, 2013 @ 1:01 am
I am proud that these distributors are putting ideals before money. The gun manufacturers need to get on board. That would force them to repeal, because they want guns for LEO.
Comment by Elijlah — February 17, 2013 @ 1:02 am
IF GUNS ARE SO BAD WHY IS OUR GOVERNMENT TRYING TO TAKE AWAY SOMETHING THAT THEY OWN
SO MANY OF????? IF OUR GOVERNMENT IS REALLY ALL ABOUT PROTECTING CHILDREN I SUGGEST
THEY START BY STOPPING DRUGS ON THE STREET. THIS WOULD BE A VERY GOOD START TOWARD
REAL CHILD PROTECTION..THEY ARE NOT AT ALL TRYING TO PASS THESE BANS
TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY. IF THEY WERE TRYING TO PROTECT YOU, THEY WOULD REQUIRE YOU TO CARRY A FIREARM AT ALL TIMES. WE ALL SEE HOW UNORGANIZED THEY ARE IN TIMES OF REAL CRISIS…EACH MAN FOR HIMSELF….GOD HELP US IF WE HAVE TO DEPEND
ON THE GOV TO PROTECT US…
Comment by Barry D — February 17, 2013 @ 1:19 am
I fully support manufacturers and retailers that refuse to provide services, or product to state and federal agencies that are denying American citizens their rights. The Second Amendment and the writings of our founders in the Federalist Papers is very clear in it’s meaning and intent. The Constitutionally illegal disarming of American citizens is disturbing on so many levels. If all gun owners and the businesses that support legal gun ownership come together as one voice perhaps the politicians will get the message. I will continue to support Cheaper Than Dirt and other companies that either relocate, or refuse to service the offending state/federal agencies that attempt to deny law abiding citizens their Second Amendment rights. I commend them for their courage and willingness to sacrifice business and the monetary loss that entails. This is no longer a simple matter of gun control, it has become an effort to disarm American gun owners in well defined and coordinated steps.
Comment by Steve Cox — February 17, 2013 @ 4:58 am
I also agree with the actions these companies are taking and I will make a concientious effort to buy only from companies doing the same.One thing I do not agree with is the fact that I(and others)feel that certain companies(CTD being one for example) in the firearm & firearm accesories business taking advantage of the current situation by gouging their tried and true customers.I mean P-Mags for $99 each,come on.I know Magpul has raised their price some,but I know for a fact that havn’t raised the price high enough to justify $99.There are many other examples I could list.
Comment by Brent Ballington — February 17, 2013 @ 5:14 am
I fully support the moves of these companies to take a firm stand, but in order to be effective, ALL suppliers must be encouraged to do this. THAT can be accomplished by consumer boycotting of those companies choosing not to play our game. Hit them where it hurts. I would also point out that lawmakers care most – and in many cases only – about their re-election. We need to make it crystal clear to these ass-wipes that any moves to limit our fits will result in their ouster. Period. Set up picket lines around their personal residences if necessary. We need to put their balls in a vice so tight that they have to comply.
Be creative. Think like a Colonist. You know how to win this. I’m talking about civil disobedience and the worst kind of economic and political blows below the belt. Make passing these laws more painful than doing nothing.
Comment by Wayne — February 17, 2013 @ 8:44 am
As a law enforcement officer I agree with the policy to sell to government agencies only what can be sold to law abiding citizens. All of the manufacturers and suppliers should get together on this and stick to it. Manufacturers should cut off suppliers who go against this by not dealing with them any longer. Once we lose the 2nd amendment, the 1st amendment will be soon to follow.
Comment by Mark Mendelson — February 17, 2013 @ 9:34 am
Being retired Law Enforcement and also trainer at the present. I fully support the position of the above named companies. And I believe any law enforcement officer and agency worth their salt should also stand up for the Second Amendment and Constitutional Rights of the American Citizens. The source of the problem did not originate from guns but in fact, from all the individuals involved having mental health issues. And in fact most were on prescription mind altering drugs at the time of the incident so prior warnings existed. Bottom line the liberal politicians are out of control. And all including the law enforcement agencies and officers in these states need to take a stand for the American people not the corrupt politicians who are eroding our Constitution. Congratulations to LaRue, DPMS, Olympic, Cheaper than Dirt and all the other companies that are standing on the side of the American citizens, the Second Amendment and our Constitutional God Given Rights!
I am also glad some of the companies are pulling out of those states due to the fact they will be significantly reducing the tax revenue for these states and corrupt politicians to operate on. Congratulations to Governor Perry and others for inviting companies to come to Texas and other states! Bottom line the states that are supporting the citizens will reduce unemployment while the problem states will be increasing unemployment. The weapons industry generates billions of tax dollars and thousands of jobs all across the USA! God Bless America and the Defending of our Second Amendment!
We must stand together! The old saying comes to mind! If you do not stand for something you will stand for anything! We stand for our Second Amendment Rights!
Lt. R.C. Carter (Ret.LE)
Comment by Lt. R.C. Carter — February 17, 2013 @ 9:41 am
I ABSOLUTELY support the idea. It affects me as a NJARNG soldier and would hinder my job directly, but I still support the idea. We ourselves are citizens of this country. I can have an M4 with thirty round mags during the day on the job, but at the end of the day I go to jail if I have the very same equipment at home.
Comment by 1LT James D. — February 17, 2013 @ 9:45 am
A lot of good comments here and looking at the one before mine I have some bad news.
We’re already cornered. Thanks to the excellent job the government has done of dumbing down the American People. Flip on the TV, take a short drive, a walk through your local mall, and you’ll notice ignorance in abundant supply. Hopefully this attack on our 2nd Amendment will wake people up to what’s been going on in our country for long time. A push by government to control the people. Maybe a start to turning things around would be to move these companies to gun friendly states and not stop there.
Other companies as well. Look back to our so called Civil War providing your not one those who believes as taught in a government schools that it was all about slavery and freeing them.
It’s starting to appear it may be time for a real Civil War. With a lot of hard work, effort, sacrifice, and education we might win this one without firing a shot.
Comment by Brucew — February 17, 2013 @ 10:07 am
I fully support any Gun company or Firearms accessories company, that holds every one in these restrictive states to the same standard. Now that’s truly UNIVERSAL! So sick of these scumbag politicians using a personal tragedy for their own underhanded agendas. They damn sure are not disarming their personal security teams. Those people with guns ARE CITIZENS, All others are subjects! Citizens unite and show these bastards who holds the power. Vote these scumbags out of office, donate to the causes that help protect our rights, and pass the word to friends and family.
Comment by Earl Townsend — February 17, 2013 @ 10:21 am
I agree with arms related companies standing together and moving to friendlier environments, I also agree that these same companies should withhold sales to law enforcement and government agencies that would deny us…”We The People”. It’s time to employ some “Sanctions” against those who are against us, as…The alternative is “death by a thousand cuts”
Comment by Kevin A. — February 17, 2013 @ 10:51 am
I’d be careful about cutting off some of our best allies in LE. Maybe fight them where it hurts most, the wallet. Law suites, lawyers, Really huge class action law suites.
Comment by Steve Ladino — February 17, 2013 @ 11:13 am
The state of Arkansas will gladly welcome these companies. We will even help find suitable facilities.
Comment by Budd Dunson — February 17, 2013 @ 11:14 am
I agree wholeheartedly and would further encourage all American firearm and ammunition manufacturers to cease sales to the US government also (including the US military) if Obamas gun laws pass and are enacted. It’s time for the civilian market to have first dibs on weapon and ammunition manufacturing in this country. These companies cannot survive on government contracts alone.
Comment by Jonny V — February 17, 2013 @ 11:34 am
The manufacturers and all gun owners need to solidly oppose the government’s efforts to ban our right to own guns, be it state, local, or federal. If any companies are looking for a better place to operate, maybe Kansas would be more friendly. Watch for the 2013 House Bill 2199 to pass in the Kansas legislature.
Comment by Vince Brown — February 17, 2013 @ 11:38 am
I will definitely support any company that fights back against these oppressive laws. The states, counties, and cities that do not suport our Constitution do not deserve our support. Any firearms manufacturers who would like to relocate are welcome in North Carolina!!!!
Comment by David Hayden — February 17, 2013 @ 11:41 am
I also applaud this action and before I buy any ammo or weapons from any company I will check to see if they support this ban to LE/Govt agencies. I will also cease to support any police org. like FOP in response to their support of anti-gun legislation. I am so glad to see real American companies standing up for our rights.
Comment by Jason — February 17, 2013 @ 12:59 pm
I promise to purchase at least one gun/product from any gun company that moves from an oppressive state to my state of Texas…
Comment by David w — February 17, 2013 @ 1:14 pm
I fully support the actions taken by those companies named in the above article.
I will support, further, any other arms or accessory companies taking similar actions.
It is time, and past, that we, the firesrms community, remind the politicians in the referenced states/municipalities as well as those at the federal level, that they are NOT OUR RULERS! They are in office to carry out the will of their constituents, not to push their own personal and/or political agendas.
Those in positions of power/influence need to be reminded LOUDLY that they were hired for their positions through the vehicle of the election process, and can be fired the same way if we have the courage to do so.
To those companies contemplating moving to more firearms-friendly venues, I say RIGHT ON!
To those companies refusing to sell LE agencies those firearms and magazines prohibited to civilians, I say GOOD ON YOU!
What part of “………….shall not be infringed…” do these politicians not understand?
Comment by Sanford Butler — February 17, 2013 @ 1:42 pm
As a California resident I applaud any business, especially gun manufacturers, who choose to relocate outside California borders. Jerry Brown and the Democrats have made this state one of the most, if not the most, hostile to business in our nation. Furthermore, I am an ardent supporter of Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s recent visit to California in order to show business here what a more friendly climate they could expect in Texas if they chose to relocate there.
Comment by Steve Smith — February 17, 2013 @ 2:14 pm
Yes!!! This is a great way to show the bureaucrats and the antigun bigwigs who want to be the only ones with a weapon that they are no better than the people they are supposed to serve, not dominate and take control of. I VERY STRONGLY support these companies and any like them that say up yours to the state governments that are tyrants. I wish all gun manufacturers would take this stance. Sure would piss off Diane Feinstein and all her cronies if they had to play by the same rules they want to impose on all us peons. Long live freedom and equality!
Comment by Thomas S. — February 17, 2013 @ 2:39 pm
I’m retired LE, but feel law abiding, responsible civilians are entitled to the same means of self defense as LE. I applaud those companies willing to stand up to states that are limiting a citizen as to what they may own to protect themselves. I am encouraging all of 300+ FB friends to order something from the businesses who are pushing back.
Comment by Eli Parker — February 17, 2013 @ 2:47 pm
I completelty support the firearms manufacturers in their efforts to have the same rights as any other business in which to run their companies. I would love for every firearms manufacturer to move from those anti-gun states to areas that appreciate the companies and the jobs brought to the friendly states. Maybe some day the liberal northeast and west will wake up and throw out all the non-American politicians they have mistakenly elected.
Julian Grimes
Comment by Julian Grimes — February 17, 2013 @ 3:09 pm
hats off to all companies that stand up to the ridiculous regulations the tyrannical northerners are trying to impose on the law abiding citizens of this country, Being from 2 southern gun loving free states we welcome all firearm, munitions and accessories manufacturing companies to come south to the warm sunshine and open arms of the southern hospitality ,
150 years the last war of northern aggression they had the manufacturing that was their advantage now it will be ours,
IMPEACH THE DEMACRATS OUT OF OFFICE ALL OF THEM!!!
Comment by jolly roger — February 17, 2013 @ 3:26 pm
I agree…don’t sell to NY state. I plan on moving to Tennessee within two years. If you have a factory here, please move out as well!
Comment by Kevin k — February 17, 2013 @ 3:37 pm
The Constitutional Amendment Process
The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution.
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention. The Congress proposes an amendment in the form of a joint resolution. Since the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval. The original document is forwarded directly to NARA’s Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication.
A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 of 50 States). When the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution.
President Obama is openly disregarding the law. Congress and the Supreme Court are standing by and letting him do it. WE THE PEOPLE have the power to control our government representatives. They are obligated to doing what we sent them to
Washington to accomplish. We need to band together and have them removed.
New York, Colorado, the city of Chicago are ignoring the law and their leaders need to be replaced–now.
I have yet to read of or hear any citizen (pro or anti gunner) openly desire to give up their rights. The people with their eyes closed need to have a reality check. This is not ultimately a program to take away firearms, it it is a program to control Americans–which can not succeed it we have the means to institute armed resistance.
It is very unfortunate that it may come to this, The fact that it is openly being considered and talked about should be enough for our government representatives to realize it needs to make changes in Washington–NOW.
Comment by L S Pawloski — February 17, 2013 @ 4:09 pm
Guns are the canaries in the mine shaft of freedom
Comment by R. Zeka — February 17, 2013 @ 4:56 pm
>>If you live in one of the states that are further tightening gun laws (California and New York, to name two examples), will you still support the firearms-related companies that decamp for other states?<>Do you support LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms, and these other companies in their efforts to restrict LE sales in anti-gun states? …Should other manufacturers follow suit?<<
Yes, unequivocally. I am tired of hearing the antigunners and liberal media tell me how NRA members feel about additional "common sense" laws, when in fact, they are lying. Given all of the activity surrounding firearms sales in the past few months, I find it incredible to think that any of this federal or state legislation can pass.
Comment by Danny81 — February 17, 2013 @ 5:03 pm
[If you live in one of the states that are further tightening gun laws (California and New York, to name two examples), will you still support the firearms-related companies that decamp for other states?]
Absolutely. The State of Ohio has two competing bills currently in the state senate, S.B.18 (bad) and S.B.36 (good).
S.B.18 seeks to ban assault weapons, high-cap mags, have the atty gen’l to create “a database of conformity”, and would, by default, also ban almost every semiauto pistol due to wording about any “semi-automatic firearm capable of accepting a detachable magazine with the capacity to accept ten or more cartridges.” Of course the bill makes no mention of fighting crime, yet seeks to create a who new class of felon (5th degree felony) for anyone violating this law.
S.B.36, on the other hand, is common-sense legislation that seeks “to prohibit any agency and its employees and agents from seizing or authorizing the seizure of any firearm from any person lawfully in possession or control of the firearm…” It also states that no “law enforcement officer, federal law enforcement officer, international agent, or other person shall enforce or attempt to enforce a firearm registration requirement or firearm ban…”
[Do you support LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms, and these other companies in their efforts to restrict LE sales in anti-gun states? ...Should other manufacturers follow suit?]
Yes, unequivocally. I am tired of hearing the antigunners and liberal media tell me how NRA members feel about additional “common sense” laws, when in fact, they are lying. Given all of the activity surrounding firearms sales in the past few months, I find it incredible to think that any of this federal or state legislation can pass.
Comment by Danny81 — February 17, 2013 @ 5:05 pm
This is an excellent idea. A government of the people, by the people and for the people should not be allowed the freedoms they would deny. Rebellion is good for the soul.
Comment by Chris B. — February 17, 2013 @ 6:00 pm
I support their decisions to go where they are wanted
Plenty of room in Nebraska,come on over.
Comment by Henry Angle — February 17, 2013 @ 6:15 pm
I believe that the right to keep and bear arms is given to the people, not law enforcement. They only have the right to have arms that the citizens can have, not the other way around. These companies are right to withhold arms from all government and leo agencies. I go even farther; with hold the ammo. When the security agencies for these legislatures run out of ammo, they will find out what it is like to be defenceless. Sandy hook and all similar tragedies were actually caused by the “Gun Free Zone” law. I believe they knew that when it was passed and are now capitalizing on it. I would love for all of those companies to relocate to Alabama. Dothan needs jobs. Tri-State Gun Club is one of the best shooting facilities in the area. Anyone that can legally own a firearm can join. We’d love to see you, come on down
Comment by beau v — February 17, 2013 @ 6:21 pm
WE MUST GET THE AMMO MANUFACTURES ONBOARD WITH THIS STAND, THE FEDS ARE COMMING IN THE BACK DOOR BY SECURING THE AMMO CONTRACTS, FOR THE OBAMA SPECIAL OPS TASK FORCES. THEY WILL TRY TO RENDOR OUR GUNS INTO BASEBALL BATS. IF WE CAN WE GET A COALITION OF ALL TO SANCTION THESE AGENCIES MAY BE DEMOCRACY CAN FIND IT’S WAY BACK TO US!
Comment by JEFF EYSOLDT — February 17, 2013 @ 6:24 pm
The American people should follow the new laws developed by the state of Oklahoma. GOD BLESS THEM. OK 2nd Amendment, prayers anytime. Buy ammo, ten commandments on courts, citizen proof to vote, english only in schools and on all signs no english, no drive. DNA test on alien felons, America like it was! 7 other states are now voting to do the same. Save America, peace loving Libyans arrested 4 christians for giving away bibles, capital offense by peace loving religious people! What a joke!go to Dearborn Michigan mention Christ in America and get hit with a bottle. Wake up were giving away all of our rights.
Comment by thomas gilligan — February 17, 2013 @ 6:57 pm
I fully support this. As a South Carolina resident I would welcome any gun manufacturing company to our state.
Comment by John — February 17, 2013 @ 7:20 pm
You’ll can come on down to South Carolina and set up shop here !
Comment by Tony A — February 17, 2013 @ 7:28 pm
All gun purchasers can support this fight by only purchasing from companies that support supplying products to LE or the military that are also available to the public. At this time the government is purchasing over 1.6 billion rounds of .223 ammo essentially implementing an arms control on the general public. The government is spending money like a drunken sailor and now they’re buying so much ammunition the public can’t buy any. I hope someone researches this and when we figure out which companies are putting the interestes of the government ahead of the people we can help put them out of business by not purchasing from them in the future. It’s time to fight back and the longer we wait, the worse this will get.
Comment by Dodge DaBullet — February 17, 2013 @ 7:35 pm
I cannot possably state it any more eliquent than it has been many times already. So I will simply say I support this movement and have been with my Congressmen and others. Keep up the good work!!!!!!
Comment by Steve Rowell — February 17, 2013 @ 8:08 pm
I fully support all the businesses involved in the manufacture or distribution of firearms who have decided to refuse to do business with any government agency in areas hostile to the 2nd Amendment. The main purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to provide the final checks and balances against an over zealous federal government-to insure We The People had the means to get the undivided attention of the Fed when “they” decided the time was right to neuter The Cinstitution and put ultimate and final control in the hands of a group of fraudulently elected Federalist poloticians. The founders knew this might happen and wrote the 2nd Amendment to insure that we the people possess ‘every terrible implement of the soldier’ so as to provide us the means to protect our freedoms and our way of life. We must all support this effort to get their attention, and we must commit to stand shoulder to shoulder together ragainst their tyrrany, no matter
Comment by Ken Hankins — February 17, 2013 @ 8:13 pm
I fully support all the businesses involved in the manufacture or distribution of firearms who have decided to refuse to do business with any government agency in areas hostile to the 2nd Amendment. The main purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to provide the final checks and balances against an over zealous federal government-to insure We The People had the means to get the undivided attention of the Fed when “they” decided the time was right to neuter The Cinstitution and put ultimate and final control in the hands of a group of fraudulently elected Federalist poloticians. The founders knew this might happen and wrote the 2nd Amendment to insure that we the people possess ‘every terrible implement of the soldier’ so as to provide us the means to protect our freedoms and our way of life. We must all support this effort to get their attention, and we must commit to stand shoulder to shoulder together ragainst their tyrrany wherever the fight takes us. Fu
damentally
Comment by Ken Hankins — February 17, 2013 @ 8:14 pm
What a great pleasure it is to see companies finally taking a stand and doing their part in support of the 2nd amendment. As gun’s lover, freedom lover citizens, we must do all we can to support these companies in their efforts. My friends and I , to do our part, we pledged to no longer vacation on any of the States that are known to be anti-gun. We figured our money is better spend in States that are free and think like we do. Nothing in New York, Colorado etc is important enough for me to visit and support their economy . If LaRue Tactical, Olympic Arms, CTD are willing to take a stand and fight at a great economic impact to there business, not eating in New York or Skiing in Colorado is a minuscule price to pay for what’s at stake here. I am bless to live in Florida.
Comment by Ray Gonzalez — February 17, 2013 @ 8:19 pm
I fully support all the businesses involved in the manufacture or distribution of firearms who have decided to refuse to do business with any government agency in areas hostile to the 2nd Amendment. The main purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to provide the final checks and balances against an over zealous federal government-to insure We The People had the means to get the undivided attention of the Fed when “they” decided the time was right to neuter The Constitution and put ultimate and final control in the hands of a group of fraudulently elected Federalist politicians. The founders knew this might happen and wrote the 2nd Amendment to insure that we the people possess ‘every terrible implement of the soldier’ so as to provide us the means to protect our freedoms and our way of life. We must all support this effort to get their attention, and we must commit to stand shoulder to shoulder together against their tyranny wherever the fight takes us. Fundamentally change America? No on my watch!
Comment by Ken — February 17, 2013 @ 8:19 pm
I hope the action started by Olympic and LaRue spreads however they will not be able to turn the tide on their own. We must stand with them and lead be exercising our rights through our vote from the local to the national level.
Our best defense is a good offence. Our offensive weapon is the vote. We all need to show up at the polls both state and Federal and vote for those that have our same values. Appathy is a dangerous thing and has brought us to this sad state.
I also find it interesting that all local and federal police and elected politicians swear to defend and uphold the Constitution fo the United States. I guess their Constitution is different than the one the average Citizen believes in.
They also like to have the media talking heads out there telling us how the courts have ruled that the rights of the citizens defined by the Bill of Rights are not unlimited. That may be however the governments power and control is not unlimited either. The People of this Country will make the untimate decision who has what power and how much.
Comment by Tom Johnson — February 17, 2013 @ 8:22 pm
I applaud company action to ban sales to states that support gun control. I would like to see the ammunition companies follow suite. I would be glad to have companies such as Magpul, DPMS, S&W, Glock, or any other company associated with arms or accessory manufacture as well as ammunition manufacturers come to my home state of Texas. I applaud the companies that are taking a stand and will gladly support them with my hard earned dollars.
Comment by Steve Sides — February 17, 2013 @ 8:24 pm
No normal person wants to see another innocent soul lost to the lunacy of a madman with any weapon of any kind, and it’s painful beyond words when little children are the victims. It only makes it worse when ill intentioned politicians lie to the ignorant masses about protecting them by taking their GOD given rights when their ulterior motive is to disarm the public, thus defeating the balance of power that is fundamental to our government. The fact is that they know gun control does not control the lawless or lunatics. So why don’t they actually look for real, valid, methods to stop these crimes? Exactly! They chip away at the 2nd Amendment (the power of the people) little by little each time an incident occurrs with the consent and support of liberal media and uninformed masses because each time furthers their ultimate cause. And the uninformed masses, fueled by emotion go right along, never stopping and demanding to know why the gun control laws they demanded the last time didn’t prevent the latest tradegy like they wanted us to think it would. The picture should be coming into focus…
Comment by Ken — February 17, 2013 @ 8:45 pm
I absolutely congratulate those companies that will no longer sell anything to LE that is not allowed to be sold to “We the People”. And as far as companies relocating out of states that have no respect for the Constitution and BoR, I also salute them. If they would like to relocate their businesses to North Idaho, please do so! We would welcome you!
Comment by Gary — February 17, 2013 @ 8:53 pm
Cmon over to the great state of Kansas. We would love for your business to call us home!
Comment by Mark Anderson — February 17, 2013 @ 9:12 pm
Come to Utah! Best place for any business… especially guns!
Comment by Robert — February 17, 2013 @ 9:30 pm
I support these companies that will no longer sell to LE & the Gov. I live in Colorado. They are pushing there anti-gun agenda in our state congress. I think we need to help too by BOYCOTTING companies in CO. and the other anti-gun states. Stop buying from companies ( Coor, Gates, Samsonite ect.) I will be looking at lables to see where they are made!!!!
Comment by Rick M — February 17, 2013 @ 10:36 pm
The State of Kansas is trying to push a law through that Firearms manufacturers in the state of Kansas would still be able to sell their firearms and other other products in Kansas. If anyone out there has any lobbying power in Kansas should be helping to make this a reality. (No matter what laws the federal gov’t passes)
Terry O’Dell
Comment by Terry O'Dell — February 17, 2013 @ 10:42 pm
I would/will support any company who decides not to do business in states that are passing unconstitutional laws that do NOTHING to stop crime and violence, but simply punish those of us who follow the rules. Even if it means I won’t be able to buy any new guns or accessories. I think this is a step that really will have an effect, and maybe open some eyes. Unfortunately it won’t work if only a few small companies do it. I say let every major manufacturer and supplier boycott the states that are stepping on our freedom. It will suck, but it would be more than worth it if it helps stop this tyranny
Comment by Tcow — February 18, 2013 @ 12:44 am
I am so glad these companies are taking this stand. I’d like to see all gun manufacturers take this one step further and stop selling to federal agencies. It is near impossible to purchase any ammo right now. It should be sold to the citizen customers instead of government agencies until there is no longer a shortage. And all American businesse need to migrate out of those states adopting fascist/socialist/communist agendas.
Comment by Vins — February 18, 2013 @ 2:56 am
As a member of the NRA, I will fully support all gun manufacturers and equipment providers that stand with the US citizen in their support of our Second Amendment right. I have sent numerous e-mail messages to my state and federal congress persons stating my position and reminding them that they work for the citizens of this country and are responsible for their actions to us.
Comment by Howard Hochman — February 18, 2013 @ 6:30 am
I fully support the positions of any company that supports my full and complete right to own any weapon I choose and can afford. Alabama is a great state to locate a business. Any and all are welcome.
Comment by Wide Awake American — February 18, 2013 @ 6:37 am
Amazing! So impressed with the companies willing to forsake their bottom line to stand up and fight for themselves and their customers AND the general public. If only our and other Big Business would do the same, look to the greater good than only for the precious few. Support these companies that support us!
Comment by kurt — February 18, 2013 @ 6:49 am
I have taken the extra step of transferring my business purchases away from states like California and New York in favor of states like Arizona and Florida that support 2nd Amendment rights. I left New York in 1997 partly because of the way the liberal politicians there treat responsible gun owners.
Now if we could just get more products made in the US, we would really be accomplishing something.
Comment by Chris — February 18, 2013 @ 6:50 am
I’m happy, proud & impressed w/ the responses the company’s are returning in light of the dark clouds that are trying to squash our rights as well as the free market. The governments have given up being leaders & are moving becoming dictators all the while living the life of ease & comfort on our tax dollars.
The latest story on Dornner makes the point that it doesn’t have to be a no name person to go off the range to create chaos w/ guns, so why ban them? Police are just like the rest of us & can break down mentally. I agree that the manufactures should only sell what we are only allowed to have but what is to stop the feds from side stepping & distributing the locals w/ better weapons? They armed the cartel!! Just proves what idiots they are.
Comment by Carlos — February 18, 2013 @ 7:48 am
I fully support their decisions to deny sales to those agencies. I also would welcome any of them to relocate to Missouri. I think Glock and Remington should follow suit as well as the major ammunition manufacturers. If Remington and Glock stop selling those agencies in question their favorite handguns and shotguns, the representatives of those agencies would definitely push back against the legislators in those states. Also, if Federal & Remington stop selling ammunition to those agencies and states until the ammunition is back on store shelves we would see a quick reversal.
Comment by Chris — February 18, 2013 @ 8:44 am
Thank you for taking a stand! I am disapointed the big ones have yet to follow suit.
Firearms manufacturors: Please consider Arkansas when you make your move. Our state legislature has recently passed several firearm friendly laws and we have competitive business taxes in this state. The city of Ft. Smith has several recently vacated locations that would be perfect for your operations. Their congressman is Representative Tom Cotton, an up and coming Conservative. Here in NW Arkansas we would also be glad to have you. We are the home of WalMart, JB Hunt and Tyson Foods. This state is a sportsman’s paradise with lots of deer and waterfowl. What could be more centrally located for your distribution point than Arkansas? Come on down to “The Natural State”!!!
Comment by Razorgirl — February 18, 2013 @ 8:44 am
This will only work if ALL manufacturers present a united front.
Sidenote: The Dems in Colorado showed their hypocrisy by adding a last minute amendment allowing MagPul to make hi cap mags as long as they are sold out of state.
So they’re ethics are ENTIRELY politically motivated.
Gun makers that feel they’re being squeezed and that can afford to move should look very closely at moving to Wyoming. Probably the most gun friendly state in the entire country.
Comment by Sam — February 18, 2013 @ 8:45 am
Well I can tell you as a NY state Police Officer I am stuck in quite the conundrum here. I am a very active shooter, hunter, outdoorsman and a NY Police Officer/Investigator as well and I am not sure of exactly what I think about all of these comments. I fully support the 2nd ammendment and absolutely hate these new restrictions on law abiding gun owners. It makes me sick to my stomache every time I hear about a cushy Politician wanting to restrict our right to own firearms as they sit in thier offices guarded by armed security. They have absolutely no clue what it’s like to live the life of an average middle class American only interested in protecting his family and fellow law abiding civilians.
On the other hand as a Police Officer I think it would be absolutely stupid to say Police Officers shouldn’t be able to possess more rounds or firearms than the average civilian. If you really think about it, are the BAD GUYS going to abide by these new laws? Hell no. They didn’t care about having guns unlawfully in the first place, they deffinately are not going to give a damb about how many rounds they are allowed to have in thier “illegal” guns either. If you are at the bank and some retard decides to rob that bank, would you want the cops to “save the day” with seven bullets in their guns? or do you want them to be fully armed and prepaired to protect you? I’m not saying I support the new gun laws or ammunition restrictions at all, but I am saying that it would not be smart to restrict the Law Enforcement Officers that protect and serve you on a daily basis 24/7. Am I saying I want to be a hipocrit? Hell no. I’m saying be smart about who you restrict. Hellooooooooooo people, wake up and smell the coffee.
Comment by Investigator Will — February 18, 2013 @ 8:54 am
I am in full support of theses actions. PLEASE RELOCATE TO ARIZONA. Representative Paul Gosar is in support of your relocation. Join Ruger in the wonderful town of Prescott or locate in Phoenix, Tucson, or any of our great cities. No earthquakes or hurricanes. We are a gun firendly state and very independent from the feds. That’s why Obama keeps suing us. So come on over.
Comment by Keith Smith — February 18, 2013 @ 9:14 am
I support all gun rights. Our right to bare arms is to give the ability to the public to fight against tyranny. It is not about hunting or which weapons they think we should have. It is just to have the ability to change by force if need be.
Comment by Steve — February 18, 2013 @ 9:27 am
Being a CA resident, I am impacted by the destruction of our 2nd Amendment rights. So it is encouraging to hear of companies like Olympic Arms and LaRue Tactical standing up and pushing back. CA may soon take away my rights to purchase what I want, but they will never take away my spirit to stand with any company/person that defends the Constitution.
Comment by Anita — February 18, 2013 @ 9:38 am
I Whole Heartedly Support thease companies for their actions. I will be proud to make my purchases from them for all of my shooting supplies and needs. I do not purchase tens of thousands of dolldrs worth of supplies every year but I am sure every dollar I can spend in their direction will help. WAKE UP AMERICAN CITIZENS If we all stand with thease great companies We ( Law Abiding Citizens )will prove that we are still and will continue to be The UNITED States that once held the respect of all other nations… If we fail and crumble it will serve to further encourage other attacks upon the rights of our Nations Citizens. Ask Yourself WHAT WILL BE NEXT???? Freedom of Speach, Privacy?
This is more than just a matter of protecting the citizens fron Criminals…
Comment by Harry Skinner — February 18, 2013 @ 9:39 am
I Agree-these companies are standing up for our rights! What a Deal, Hats off too you
Comment by Chris Richison — February 18, 2013 @ 9:39 am
Hey all you firearms and ammo manufacutures. Come to Northern Arizona. Lots of open
space, a good workforce and a firearms friendly environmnet. The Papermill closed
down and this will be a good place to setup shop. Power, water and a railroad spur
are available. I am sure if you contact Gov. Brewer, you can even get some tax
breaks and maybe even some grants to help you move.
Please consider the idea.
p. McLeod
Comment by Pat — February 18, 2013 @ 9:43 am
All firearm related companies and us the consumer must stand together. Its time for this government over reach to stop. I will be of active support in any and all means needed to turn back this threat to our constitution and particularly the 2nd ammendment.
If all Americans who are in favor of freedom and the constitution stand together we can not be stopped. 100 million Americans fighting together through education,finacial support,and active engagement if need be is a force that wont be denied.
Comment by David W — February 18, 2013 @ 9:50 am
Well Investigator Will, as we all know when seconds count the police are only minutes away. And as you say the criminals will ignore all the new regulations. Therefore, I think that I should have at least as many rounds as the potential criminal has so I can protect myself while I am waiting for you to arrive, as you are busy writing someone a speeding ticket. However, that said, the second amendment is not about you protecting me, it is about me protecting myself from a tyrannical government, of which you are a part. I don’t think that we need to smell the coffee, I think that you need to stop drinking the kool-ade…
Comment by Bob — February 18, 2013 @ 9:56 am
Who will volunteer to collect and publish a shopping list of all gun/ammunition manufacturers who take a stand against tyranny? They’re the only one I will buy from, from this day forward!
Comment by Johan — February 18, 2013 @ 9:58 am
I support these manufactures and welcome them to move their company and jobs to PA, we haven’t buckled yet.
Comment by TPS12 — February 18, 2013 @ 10:30 am
I fully support these manufactures and welcome them to move their company and jobs to PA we haven’t buckled yet.
Comment by TPS12 — February 18, 2013 @ 10:34 am
YES! Add me to the long, long list of Americans who are waking up. Thank you Cheaper Than Dirt! Other companies and individuals in the firearms business should follow suit in supporting AMERICAN FREEDOM. We are Americans. We really are different.
Comment by Bob Sullivan — February 18, 2013 @ 10:35 am
I have many acres of land in Alabama that could be had very cheaply for the Gun manufacturer looking to exit one of these idiot infested North Eastern states.
Sweet Home Alabama loves jobs and guns
Comment by david in dixie — February 18, 2013 @ 10:40 am
I support the actions of Larue, Olypmic and CTD for taking a stand against what can best be labeled insanity on current actions on gun control! As a USMC Vet and over 37 years as a LEO I wonder if politicians have a clue what the 2nd Amendment stands for as protecting freedom and citizen’s rights. I was forced to purchase handguns and magazines out of pocket because agencies did not have the funds or didn’t feel the need for officer safety as a priority in their purchases. Now we are reliving 1994 all over again and cops will be the victims just like law abiding citizens. Jack Nicoholson has a line in “Easy Rider” that says “This used to be a great country: what the hell happened”
Comment by loren huckstadt — February 18, 2013 @ 11:08 am
I fully support the efforts of all those companies. I think it is a great idea that if a citizen can’t own something, the local/state/federal agencies shouldn’t have them either. If those companies move out of a state that doesn’t support their businesses and move to a state that does, I will buy from them. Florida would WELCOME their businesses….
Comment by Terry Dell — February 18, 2013 @ 11:16 am
I am from Buffalo, NY, where the Dems are liberal, the libs are liberal, the conservatives are liberal, and the Repubs are liberal. There is little to no hope for us law abiding legal gun owners!! “For the Children” is their false mantra. Being from such a regulated state (not just guns) we don’t mind some regulation in order to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, mentally ill, or Aholes. But to pass laws and regs to strip the rights of law abiding, honest citizens is going too far. The consequences of these laws does not fall on the politicans that pass them. They still have their armed security guards and law enforcement (with weapons that I cannot own legally)to provide security for them and their families. Why am I and my family considered less important?? Assult weapon definations are a joke. going from a ten rd mag to a seven rd LOL. A pistol grip LOL. A flash supressor LOL. a collapsible stock LOL. What do any of these things have to do with the weapon. They are cosmetic. I support the actions of cheaper than dirt and other suppliers. I think that any gun mfg considering relocation to NYS would be nuts.
Comment by Tim Madigan — February 18, 2013 @ 11:20 am
I support these and other companies who have stood up for the American Citizens. It would be great if other gun manufacturers would do the same, including ammo makers.
Comment by Joe Camarra — February 18, 2013 @ 11:24 am
I am a life long resident of NY “The Nazi State”. I’m sick of this State, I’m fed up with the Nazi regime here, and I’m a law abiding citizen (Not a criminal).
I hope EVERY SINGLE WEAPONS MANUFACTURER (including companies that make ammunition) stops selling to ALL NY Law Enforcement! That’ll get these garbage gun bans lifted.
Our elected officials were sworn to UPHOLD the US Constitution. These new gun ban laws are completely Unconstitutional, and only NAZI DOUCHEBAGS would pass such laws. These tyrants should be in prison by now.
Comment by Chris — February 18, 2013 @ 12:38 pm
Hey how about a list of all the gun makers and ammo manufactures who support and don’t support Gov. Agencies and local LE. Now we’ll see where they all stand!
Comment by Rob — February 18, 2013 @ 12:40 pm
Well done, if a state is hostile towards gun ownership or manufacturing then don’t do business with that state. That is the right of these companies, and I support their move to strike back. I urge EVERY company to look at gun friendly locations for their business. Montana is pushing for MORE gun rights. Small towns in western Montana are beautiful and have lots of willing workers. As an added bonus these are popular hunting areas. Many firearms and ammunition manufacturers have already discovered Nortwest Montanas ideal safehaven!
Comment by BK — February 18, 2013 @ 1:16 pm
Bravo to Cheaper Than Dirt. All manufactures or anything having to do with firearms needs to follow suit, as some are doing. And fret not manufactures, we law abiding citizens will buy your products.
Comment by Robert Coussan — February 18, 2013 @ 1:17 pm
[...] Gun Companies Under Fire: What’s Their Next Move? [...]
Pingback by RLM News Show Blog - 2013-02-18 | Real Liberty Media — February 18, 2013 @ 1:56 pm
Ammo nor weapons should be sold to any agency that is supporting or enforcing any part of any gun ban law. Home security should never have been aloud to purchase the ammunition in the qaunities that they have just done (with our tax dollars). Ammo should not be sold to any agency and local LE in the states such as CA ,CO and NY; how long would they be able to stand without ammo or replacement parts. Thank you cheaper than dirt and all other company’s that back the freedom and rights of America.
I have been a lawful citizen for over 50yrs , please don’t make me into a outlaw , for I will put even more energy into that occupation.
Comment by M. Baird — February 18, 2013 @ 2:05 pm
We the people for gun rights should boycott states like New York and California.
Let those states feel the pinch in their wallets from less tourism.
Money Talks. Thank you Cheaper Than Dirt. Fitz (Feb. 18 2013)
Comment by MICHAEL — February 18, 2013 @ 2:30 pm
I do not represent our government, but a a chamber of commerce menmber, I encourage any and all gun and ammunition manufacturers to look at Dothan, Alabama. We have a talented and motivated workforce, a tremendous standard of living and access to Fort Rucker as well as miles of privately owned rural property accessible for development.
Comment by John Miller — February 18, 2013 @ 2:46 pm
I say FINE! If these manufacturers’ home states are turning on them, then let those manufacturers relocate those businesses to states that welcome the addition to their local economies. Let those states suffer the losses, screw em’.
Comment by Matt — February 18, 2013 @ 2:58 pm
The people of Pennsylvania would welcome firearms manufacturers looking to relocate. If any of our state or local reps try to block your relocating here we would be happy to vote their asses out. We are pro gun, pro hunting, pro constitution, and anti BS.
Comment by Joe — February 18, 2013 @ 3:10 pm
I think it is a great idea that all manufacturers and distributors of firearm products in the USA, will stop selling their products to law enforcement and government agencies that reside in any state that oppresses our 2nd Amendment Rights. A statement of such magnitude could get the state law makers to revise their laws. That would be the desired outcome. However, a move like that may backfire. Those states could simply place orders overseas. Hopefully, they would be too concerned about quality and availability to go to that extreme.
I would like to see the manufacturers move to a state that is more business friendly. Why stay in a hostile state and allow them to get the benefit of your tax dollars? Sure it’s expensive to relocate, but other states may sweeten the deal. You will probably lose some employees who can’t relocate with you, which would be terrible. But a hostile state may cause you to close your doors for good anyway.
It really stinks that the law-abiding citizens in this great country have to be concerned with losing our Constitutional Rights.
Comment by Mark Beuerle — February 18, 2013 @ 3:26 pm
Glad to see the gun companies standing up to the obama comunist besides the NRA!!!
LONG LIVE THE 2ND ADMMENDMENT. MY COLD DEAD HANDS
Comment by Matt Heakins — February 18, 2013 @ 3:28 pm
I applaud and support the businesses that have taken a stand in support of our Second Ammendment Rights even though it may cost them business or force them to relocate to areas which are not engaging in the punitive actions which our federal and many local governments have deemed wise and appropriate. It is laudable that these business take action and I thank them all for having the courage and integrity to fight back against the tryannical actions being considered or applied by the “powers that be”. I find it exceedingly curious that those of us who are law abiding and responsible gun owners are being punished for the actions of those who are neither law abiding or responsible. The reasoning behind the governments actions are nothing more than political posturing based on mistaken beliefs or a desire to appear to be doing the “right thing”. It is curious that our government is so anxious to put us in harms way by stripping us of our ability to defend ourselves; when trouble strikes and seconds count the police are only minutes away. Of course the powers that be have their armed security, gated communities, armored vehicles and the like to protect them. Lets be honest, our government officials really don’t give a damn about us. They only care about our votes which keep them in office and the tax dollars which pay their inflated and undeserved salaries. In these times of economic disaster why would the government wish to quash any legitimate commerce and put more Americans out of work? As to the proposed registration of firearms, it is simply a way to identify who has the ability to defend themselves when our corrupt government becomes so oppressive the people finally feel the need to replace them. By disarming us our government can run roughshod over us without fearing any repurcussion. Lets look at Germany. In 1938 the interior minister decreed Jews were no longer permited to own guns. We know what happened next. I know many “gun nuts” who have used their firearms in defense of themselves, their loved ones and their homes and property. In my case my spouse has used her gun to protect herself from robbery, rape and possibly death when she was attacked on the street one evening and her assailant tried to drag her into a dark alley. I have used my gun to defend myself against robbery and possibly great bodily harm on more than one occasion and I did it without having to fire a shot. Making the thugs aware that I was armed, an act of non-violence, averted an act of violence. Why is it that those communities with the most restrictive policies concerning the ownership of guns are so often the communities with the highest incidence of violent crime? I own and carry guns not because I’m afraid but, rather so I don’t have to be. Lastly, “assault rifles” and large capacity magazines are a better choice that a six shot revolver when you are faced with a mob of looters or a street gang.
Comment by E. Jerabek — February 18, 2013 @ 3:32 pm
I am a res. of New York state for just a few more years until I retire. I will support all manufacturers that ban sales to New York the only way we can win against our gov. is financially and we all need to stick together to win this one. I have been a avid hunter all my life but I have bought my last New York State hunting license. I hope more people in New York will do the same we all may have to give up a little to win. I hope a lot more company’s follow Olympic,larue and Cheaper than Dirt. Thanks for supporting us and our second amendment rights
Comment by John — February 18, 2013 @ 4:01 pm
I am a carpenter living in TN and I totally support the stand of gun and accessory manufacturers. When I buy my next weapon or accessory it will be one of these companys I deal with. I will be emailing the major gun companys to get on board. This is a good chance for Smith and Wesson to redeem themselves after their capitulation during the first assault weapons ban.
Comment by Billy Switzer — February 18, 2013 @ 4:11 pm
Back during the last “assault Weapon” Ban, deals were struck by some of the major firearms manufacturers. I read they would no longer sell the evil weapons to us lowly civilians. In turn they would receive government contracts from the Clinton administration. Guess they got screwed! Gee, go figure!!!
At the same time, patriots like Barret were refusing to sell firearms, parts or service to California in response to banning his products from civilian use.
We decided at that point not to buy any more of those firearms and to support those like Barret. Bye the way we have LONG memories! We actually found other firearms (like Barret’s) that were equal or higher quality, more reliable and usually at a better price. We also watched the offending companies suffer for selling gun owners out. Apparently we were not alone.
Hopefully the firearms industry will stand united in the name of freedom this time.
After all, if the government does not trust it’s own citizens, it does not deserve trust!
Comment by Atelang — February 18, 2013 @ 4:40 pm
i think that more and more manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers of firearms and accessories will continue to join in. I think it would be a good idea to create a logo or seal so that the public will know that the company they want to do business with is one of those companies supporting this movement.
Comment by Rex A. Thompson — February 18, 2013 @ 5:34 pm
Colorado is now ground zero for democratic gun control. I support the companies that will not do business in this state and also the ones who want to leave.
Criminals are laughing at us.
Comment by Jay — February 18, 2013 @ 6:39 pm
I applaud you manufacturers and Cheaper Than Dirt for your stance against tyranny! I am and continue to support and email my support to those and other manufacturers that will stand up to tyranny. What I don’t understand is all this talk and action of the gun control issues AS IF it has already passed as federal law. It is no secret this administration cares nothing of our country’s heritage: the things that have made us great. It cares nothing of our economy. This administration’s sole purpose seems to be the ruination of the United States as we know it. One of the other feeds that i have read by a gentleman in New York, wrote of “drawing a line in the sand”. The scary thing is that the government will attack us through the use of the IRS and passing bogus laws behind closed doors. Where are our (American) leaders?!! Where is the line in the sand for the rest of us outside of New York?
Comment by Gary Fuji — February 18, 2013 @ 7:09 pm
It makes me happy the manufactures have voluntarily made this commitment to their civilian customers although it is very important that the catalog venders such as CTD do the same. What good doesit do the customer when items available to government entities are denied to customers in states like California. When wholesalers back up the illegal and unconstitutional laws concerning, most importantly high capacity magazines. There are three places in the Constitution that make very clear that any right enjoyed by one state shall be enjoyed by all states.
What I believe allows states to get away with UN- Constitutional bans or laws is the fact that venders fall into line with the laws in fear of what the state regulatory officials threaten.
Vendors must tell the state legislators” no we will not cooperate with unconstitutional laws or bans the restrict the Second Amendment Rights of law abiding citizens whom wish to exercise the. Right to. Keep and bear arms in anyway they choose to.
It is extremely important that the Government at all levels be reminded, daily if that’s what it takes, the the term is” We The People” not you the goverment. And that at no time in history has liberty been won by the citizens of any nation or country with out violence of action. If the American citizens are clearly aware of how much our rights have been denied since evan a decade ago that violence of action will occurs as it did against the king of England.
Especially considering how obvious it has become that President Oboma is confused ad to the difference between a president and a King.
We must clarify the distinction for him .
Most importantly he must understand what” DON’T TREAD ON ME ” means and and what the results of not heeding that warning will be.
Thank you for this venue to speak my piece.
Comment by Frank S.Jr — February 18, 2013 @ 7:15 pm
I completely support those companies that will stand for the people of the United States and for our Consttutional rights. Welcome to Texas our doors are open and our right to bear arms is strong and will not be challenged. We stand united with our fellow Americans
Comment by Ralph Gonzales — February 18, 2013 @ 8:27 pm
A fact that the public must be made aware. All of these so called high capacity magazines happen to be the STANDARD capacity magazines that come with the firearms from the manufacturer. That fact is true with all pistols.
And true with many long guns, ska rifles.
One more fact that needs to be brought to the average citizen is that every single massacre from Colimbine to the latest is
That every one has been committed by a liberal democrat. The Colimbine boys were both raised by liberal democrats. The nut from Aurora work as a volunteer for Obama first election
Comment by Frank S.Jr — February 18, 2013 @ 10:29 pm
The theory’s good- if citizens can’t have something, then neither should the police. Gotta watch out for administrative shell game. Nothing keeps one jurisdiction from selling something to another. Ditto the feds- they could buy anything and make a “gift” to a jurisdiction that is embargoed.
On the federal level, DHS is buying 70,000 select-fire M-4s and 2 billion rounds. Obama/Biden/Feinstein are taking disingenuous to stratospheric heights. DHS, a civilian agency, needs genuine military weapons but civilians can’t have semi-auto AR-15s? Puh-leeze!!
Comment by Rich Rodriguez — February 19, 2013 @ 1:34 am
Elections have consequences! I suspect many of you that are complaining about gun-control actually ’caused this problem’ when you ‘failed to vote’ or failed to vote ‘properly’. Joining NRA ‘now’ is a good thing…But you should have joined long before 2008 and you shouldn’t have voted for Obama. For those in NY, New Yorkers are responsible for their anti-gun mayors & governors & Senators & Congressmen…who time & time again…are re-elected by the PEOPLE of NY. If you don’t ‘vote against’ these people, at each opportunity, or, if you actually cast your vote ‘for’ these people…You’re getting exactly what you bargained for. I wouldn’t live in NY if it were FREE. I hope S&W, Remington, Winchester and all the ‘majors’ boycott NY. Remember, failure to vote is never an option. Failure to vote ‘properly’ is Treasonous
Comment by Bob Shelky — February 19, 2013 @ 7:53 am
Add me to the list. I am a LEO and I never thought of the seperation of division of LEO vs. civilian. But I do agree with what is being said here. I am grateful to live in a state that supports the 2nd Amendment. I believe all law abiding citizens have the right to protect themselves and their loved ones. NO government agency has the right to take that away. That’s why it is called a Bill of Rights. They are rights, and not a privledge. I have my own personal ban, I do not visit or vacation in states that do not support the 2nd Amendment. Guess I will have to add a few more to the list.
Comment by David Jones — February 19, 2013 @ 8:24 am
How about just simply moving all the factories down south, most of us in the south are gun owners and between all the guns and ammo that we alone purchase we could keep the gun and ammo factories in buisness. AND WE NEED THE JOBS!
Comment by John H — February 19, 2013 @ 8:39 am
We should refuse any good or service comming from these states, I only buy products from Pro-Gun states. I check food, shampoo, ect. I am also refusing items from companies who’s headquarters are in the Anti-Gun States. We are going to have to quit talking and do something.
Comment by Keb Wallis — February 19, 2013 @ 9:51 am
I fully endorse these companies for backing our rights as gun owners. I live in CA and am worried that the lib-tards will diminish our gun owning rights even further in the near future. Can’t find any ammo for my 9mm, .22 lr, .40 and AK-47 steel cased rounds are $.50 a round! What a joke! Thanks to all the people using school shootings to further their own personal agendas… Won’t be long and I will be joining Creedmoor Sports, this state is really starting to suck.
Comment by Kyle J — February 19, 2013 @ 11:22 am
Yooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooyah!
It’s time for the revolution to stand up for the Second Amendment. Remember… without the 2nd we will never keep the 1st. I heartly support munitions and firearms manufacturers who refuse to be turned into goverment bitches.
Bring you companies to Virginia… we are still Americans.
Paladinn
Comment by Paladinn — February 19, 2013 @ 12:37 pm
I support any company that will stand for what is right for everyone.
Comment by bill — February 19, 2013 @ 1:57 pm
I commend the stand these companies are taking. I’m currently a resident of the state of New York. I am a veteran and now a DOD contractor, I have never been arrested and have a security clearance. Yet purchases I made legally, exercising my rights that I have fought for while defending the rights of small minded individuals who don’t even understand their rights or why they have them, are being scrutinized. It sickens me to no end that the average citizen is absolutely ignorant of the fact that the Patriot Act already did away with the First, Fourth and Sixth Amendments. It gives total power to the Federal Agencies to go after “Individuals” under the Lone Wolf Provision for saying or acting in a manner that is against the Government. It was never intended to protect the PEOPLE. When you are under an investigation of this sort the Federal Agencies involved can not only search and seize all your property but they do not have to give you a fair trial. Remember, you are a Terrorist for speaking or acting against the Government of the United States now. A right once thought to be indisputable by the Contitution. The ACLU has been following several cases where the Patriot Act has been being used to bust individuals for petty crimes by eves dropping on their phones, texts and by running search graphs that target on key words and terminology on social media sites. The Patriot Act has targeted more American Citizens than foreign terrorists because they tie it in and use it for The War On Drugs as well. Now do you really think we need to lose any more of our rights. If you don’t agree with the right to bear arms there are several other countries out there that don’t have that right. Please do the true Americans a favor and remove yourself from OUR country. I’m also looking into new employment in a different state where I can still feel the breath of freedom on my cheek and a smile on my face when I walk outside my front door and rack my AK or AR.
As a side note I wish the Aviation companies would do the same to the TSA. We’re the only country that treats it’s citizens like criminals for wanting to travel. I travel a lot for my job. The TSA hasn’t caught one terrorist yet but I have been searched more times than I can count and I’m sure the rest of you have as well. Remember they are supposed to protect you not humiliate or subjugate you and the searches they do of your person without probable cause are a violation of your rights again. Welcome to America, stand in line, don’t talk back, do as we say and you can live as free as we tell you you can.
Comment by Dustin — February 19, 2013 @ 3:44 pm
I DO AGREE WITH THE GUN COMP. WE SHOULD HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS ANY GOVERMENT TO OWN FIREARMS THAT ANY POLICE,GOVERMENT,OR FED. AGENCEY CAN OWEN. ALSO OVER THE WEEKEND I SAW ON CNN THAT THE PRIME MINSTER OF AUSTRALY WAS TALKING ABOUT THE GUN LAWS IN THAT COUNTRY. WELL TO THAT I SAY THAT MAY WORK THERE BUT NO HERE IN THIS COUNTRY. WERE THAY TOOK ALL OF THE GUNS AWAY FOME ALL COUNTRY MEN & THEN TOLD THEM THEY COULD OWN ONLY SINGEL BARREL SHOTGUNS. THIS IS THE MENTALTY THAT THIS GOVERNMENT IS HEADING TO & SHAME ON US IF WE ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN.
Comment by BOB — February 19, 2013 @ 5:23 pm
I fully support every company that is taking a stand. Its about time. I believe the internet has helped this happen because they can see that there are a lot of us behind them.
Comment by Jim — February 19, 2013 @ 7:57 pm
I applaud all these company’s & vow to support them in any way possible . I’m not from any of these states, but who knows what tomorrow will bring with what the anti gunners are trying to accomplish .
I hope not only more firearm manufactures but the ammo manufactures will follow suit as well . It’s time to stand up to these Holier than us people .
John
Comment by John — February 20, 2013 @ 8:49 am
I applaud the decisions made by these fine companies. I frequently purchase from Magpul and will continue to do so. I also look forward to leaving the Socialist Republic of California. Eventually they’ll pass enough laws to make it impossible to own any weapon. They also come up up with some of the most ingenious laws to bureaucratically discourage gun ownership.
Comment by TrainLeavingStation — February 20, 2013 @ 2:50 pm
i think that these companies and manufacturers that will not sell to le/government agencies in states that ban these items to private law abiding citizens or are looking to ban sales of these items to law abiding citizens show an incredible amount of backbone and are putting the best interest of their customers above profit and monetary gain. i therefore believe they are the only companies that deserve my business. i hope other companies in states that are trampling on our second amendment rights will follow suit and do the same thing.
Comment by daniel rose — February 20, 2013 @ 4:52 pm
I support and thank every company that stands up for whats right even if it cost them some business. The way true American companies should be!!! If every company that has anything to do with firearms got on board with the millions of citizens we would never have this gun debate come up again. I wish someone will ask these anti-gun people how they came up with this 40% of all gun sales happen without a background check. I looked up how they came up with this number and all I could find is this study was done 20 years ago before mandatory backgound checks from ffl dealers came into law. The other fact that ticks me off is that this study was done on about 270 people!!! Even this study was 36%, and counted family members giving guns to other members. So how’d they come up with 40%? They asked under 300 people 20 years ago and there using it to say out of the millions of gun purchases 40% are bought without a background check!!! This is from a econimist that studys the effects of gun laws. He also said theres no way to know and he cant imagine it being over single digits. Thats the facts side, now here comes the commensene side!! If you say 40% have no background check and no paper trails, how can you know this information. Think about it!!!! There is no evidence to come up with this number or any number for that matter!! Im tired of all the americans not questioning all these facts that there gov is comming up with. Americans need to stop being sheep and think for themselves!!!
Comment by Ricky — February 20, 2013 @ 5:49 pm
I think it’s a terrific stance and all U.S. manufacturers should follow suit. Hell, maybe without the LE and Feds being able to purchase mags, ammo, and arms us little people might actually be able to find some to buy for ourselves. By the way, if any of these companies are looking to move we’d love to have them in Oregon.
Comment by Jeff — February 20, 2013 @ 6:52 pm
I have been a resident of New York state my entire life and have not seen another state that is any more beautiful than New york State and especially the Southern Tier of Western NY I LOVE it, despite the ridiculous taxes. That being said I would be willing to give that all up to find a place that respects the rights of it’s own citizens. Any place that does not respect my rights and gives no guarantees to protect my freedoms as is their responsibility as elected officials is no longer the USA but some “other country”. Therefore, I will move my 5 family members to a state which respects our rights as a law abiding citizens, I have followed every law to get my permit to carry concealed spanning 5 years in NYS, despite the 2nd amendment, and the extensive background checks I have undergone. The rights of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. This is clear as can be and I am now fed up. No more Cuomo , GOODBYE
Comment by michael pilat — February 20, 2013 @ 8:56 pm
[Update on 2-20-13. Since the original article, several other companies have joined the effort. As more companies commit, we’ll attempt to add them in a timely fashion. Woody @ CTD.]
West Fork Armory
Smith Enterprise
Alex Arms
Spike’s Tactical
Quality Arms
Liberty Suppressors
J&T Family of Companies
American Spirit Arms
Trident Armory
Head Down Products, LLC
J&G Sales
Barrett Firearms Updated Policy
Exile Machine LLC
Tier One Arms
Bravo Company USA and BCM
Comment by Woody — February 20, 2013 @ 11:32 pm
Indeed bravo, I will do my best to keep up with which companies are doing this and make it a point to give them my business. Where can I get a list of the companies doing this?
Comment by robert hester — February 21, 2013 @ 7:15 am
What a shame, we let our policy makers pull the wool over our eyes. They want to take our guns away so we will conform to the new world order planned for all of us. Look up infowars.com w/ Alex Jones if you want to see what is really going on! Also, look up agenda 21 on youtube and see what is in store for the human race. And, if you want to see what a sham that school shooting was, go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXYKx_8&feature=youtube_gdata_player. You will be amazed at the details you see!
Comment by Derek — February 21, 2013 @ 9:06 am
Come on! I want to see Black Hills, Remington, LMT, FN, Colt, Night Force, Leupold, Knight Arms, ATK…
YOU OUT THERE MAKE IT HAPPEN ! WRITE, EMAIL, CALL.
“As an end-user of your company’s products, I wish to express my support of those companies currently participating in business restrictions against government agencies infringing or violating the constitutional rights of citizens.”
What about revoking US Citizen’s rights without due process? Being adjudicated as “mentally unfit” should require a court of law, not some government list. What about a US citizen’s right to be executed after due process by a court of law, not by drone strike?
It isn’t just about guns! ! !
JB
Comment by JBev — February 21, 2013 @ 2:23 pm
I’m so happy to see our arms manufactures and suppliers step up to the plate and help citizens fight back, makes me feel like there other Americans that see the BS going on here. We lose our 2nd Amendment rights, we lose America and the right to protect ourselves even against an unjust Government. Law abiding citizens will be the only ones hurt by any new legislation. Way to go guys and thanks… Hope the other Arms manufactures and dealers follow suit.
Comment by Todd — February 21, 2013 @ 3:46 pm
So much support has been expressed that I cannot add anything to the comments.
I fully support these companies and will ALWAYS seek to do business with those who honor the 2nd Amendment.
I know how difficult and expensive it is to relocate a business but DO ENCOURAGE ALL MANUFACTURERS OF GUNS AND ACCESSORIES TO LEAVE THEIR HOSTEL STATES FOR THOSE WITH A LOVE OF 2ND AMENDMENT.
Comment by Alan Underhill — February 21, 2013 @ 5:18 pm
I also support the companies that are taking a stand for our 2nd amendment rights. IF WE THE PEOPLE dont stand up to the STUPID politicians then they will walk all over us ,THE CITIZENS, that are paying their salaries for their extravagant lifestyle and their power grabbing attitude. Who is supposed to be the PUBLIC SERVANTS? Do they serve on our behalf or do we serve them?? I want America to be free to be the land of opportunity for everyone to do the best they possibly can without he interferrence of the government or be under the thumb of politicians that want to be part of the ruling class. UNITED WE STAND. DIVIDED WE FALL. I’m betting that Americans will stand against the political terriorists !!!
Comment by H.L. — February 21, 2013 @ 7:39 pm
MagPul, Montana has open arms for you and anyone else that believe in the 2nd Amendment right. The more the better.
Comment by Mike — February 22, 2013 @ 2:36 pm
Yes, I support all the companies who are taking a stand against these communist leaders. But, it shouldn’t just be in New York. It should be every state that passes unconstitutional laws against gun owners. Especially in California. It is really getting scary here in CA. They will not stop until they have confiscated our guns. So, all of these gun and ammo companies should really bare down on CA lawmakers to back off their communist agenda and leave us gun owners alone.
Comment by Kevin Keesler — February 23, 2013 @ 9:16 am
Yes, We all need to stand together.
Come to the free state of NEVADA. We need the work!!!!
Comment by SCOTT — February 23, 2013 @ 9:17 am
EFI and other businesses who stand up for the second amendment should be (must be) supported by all of us who value the freedoms guaranteed by our constitution. Anyone who wants their children and grandchildren to know what freedom is will have to stand up for our rights, or those who think the ‘little people’ have to be controlled for their own good will win. Standing up for one’s rights in our society can, in many cases, best be done by voting with your dollars. Support as many pro second amendment businesses as you can. And the businesses who refuse to serve those that try to take our freedoms away are heros in my eyes. Support them with your dollars Also, tell your friends how you feel and tell the businesses how you feel. Write to your local new organizations (TV, radio, newspapers) and tell them how you feel. Write to your government representatives and tell them how you feel. Be heard, don’t be the silent ones who get walked on.
Those companies who support the gun-control advocates will NOT get my dollars. I may still have to pay taxes to my anti-gun government but I will let my representatives know, as clearly as I can express it, exactly how I feel about it.
Comment by RD Schneider — February 23, 2013 @ 7:31 pm
Hey, what can I say that hasn’t already been said? By God, I’m willing to take it even a step further. My whole family will stop watching South Park! Tell ‘em Kenny. YOU BASTARDS!!!!!
Comment by Bill from Boomhower, Texas — February 25, 2013 @ 12:54 am
Man, the times are a changin’! Some day when you pull up to the gun store, and get out of your car to walk in, some cop may be standing in the shadows, beckoning; “PSSSSSSSST!!!! Hey buddy. Here’s $2285.00. Can you go in there, and get me and AR-15?????
Comment by Bill from Boomhower, Texas — February 25, 2013 @ 1:14 am
sgammo dot com refuses to take part in this government ban.. i’ll now buy my ammo elsewhere.
Comment by James — February 25, 2013 @ 1:56 pm
I want to thank any gun gear company that refuses to do buisness with tyrants.
Please move to Idaho we welcome you all. Maybe we could entice every manufacture to move here and then thumb our noses at the states loosing all those jobs—it would be a beautiful thing.
I for one will be a supporter of any company that refuse to sell to the govt a-holes.
You are the last line of defence before the “ZERO” has his way and trashes the 2nd Amendment.
I wont have any ilegle guns but I will have some UNDOCUMENTED ones.
Comment by Sandman — February 27, 2013 @ 2:22 am
Being a LEO in NYS I find this tactic ridiculous. Why should these companies not sell their firearms and accessories to me? Do you think that as a police officer we have any say in what our governor does or passes? If these company’s “stand” as so many have called it causes an officer to lose their life, their blood will be on all of your hands for your support of this close minded idea and I am an NRA member who fully supports the right of law abiding citizens to carry and purchase all firearms.
Comment by W rak — March 2, 2013 @ 1:19 am
I absolutely back these folks 100% for their strength and fortitude to stand up and risk everything against the anti-gunners who are running amok. Here in California we unfortunately have a super majority (Taxocrats) in the state government who are bound and determended to out do NY as far as the stictest gun laws go. It is absolutely shameful. They are even going to try and pass a law forcing all gun owners to buy liability insurance in case their guns are used to cause any harm to anyone. If anyone needs liability insurance for the harm they do here in California (or this country for that matter), it’s the scumbag Taxocrats! God Bless CTD and the rest of the companies for standing up for our Constitutional rights and not selling weapons,ammo, and mags to any law enforcement people that we can’t have!
Comment by Terry Jeske — March 2, 2013 @ 1:27 am
I support all methods mentioned in the article wholeheartedly as an unhappy resident of Kalifornia. How about any of the companies with federal contracts making the same threat? I know the chance is slim when the money starts flowing that heavily, but we can wish, right?
Comment by Lonewolf — March 2, 2013 @ 1:42 am
It is interesting that Homeland Security has just purchased 7000 “Personal Defense Weapons” otherwise known as AR’s. The reason given by Napolitano was that they are easy to handle since they are so compact. What hypocrisy!! So, are they PDW’s or Assault Weapons as they are being defined by Obamas Media? And why have the Feds ordered over 1 BILLION rounds of ammo (40 cal HP). Why did the ammo manufacturers sell them all that? Why are they still awaiting a shipment of thousands of .223 rnds? Manufacturers have to stop supplying such numbers that have an affect of making ammo unavailable to us.
Comment by TonyC — March 2, 2013 @ 2:18 am
I am 100 percent behind these companies for taking a stand with the 2nd Amendment and law abiding Gun owners. A big THANK YOU to all of you!!!!
Comment by M. L. Miller — March 2, 2013 @ 2:33 am
The companies that have stopped LE sales in restrictive states have shown true patriotism and are the leaders in our cause to protect the rights of the American people. This hurts our government where it is most painful… their pocketbooks. God bless these companies, and hopefully more will follow. Let’s pressure Glock and Sig Sauer to restrict LE sales, that would really get them going! Thanks CTD and all other involved companies for your protection of the American people from tyranny.
Comment by Matt — March 2, 2013 @ 2:35 am
I’m glad that companies are taking the fight to states that restrict gun rights of law abiding citizens. We need to stand behind those companies support them and if so needed help them move to states that support them. I regret that we must take away law enforcement tools but criminals do not buy their weapons at the local store they buy them from gangs or on the black market. I hope that this will show how ludicrous state governments have become and they listen to the people. Stop the criminals not law abiding citizens.
Comment by Jeff Monroe — March 2, 2013 @ 2:47 am
I would absolutely support any firearm or firearm accessory manufacturer that is willing to restrict sales of their products to LE in anti-gun states. Good for them! I would love to see those manufactures pack up and move out of their state if that state is restricting the right of law abiding citizens to “Keep and bear arms.” I would also really like to see those manufacturers move to Arizona.
Comment by Frank Farquhar — March 2, 2013 @ 3:05 am
Thank God companies like you have the brass to stand with us against a government who only wishes to trample our rights that 1000′s have died for. I will support your company’s by ONLY buying products made or sold by you. And please, when and if you relocate, TAKE ME WITH YOU!!!!
Comment by Kenneth Maarleveld — March 2, 2013 @ 3:56 am
Magpul is proud to announce the “Boulder Airlift”, our program to make sure that responsible Colorado citizens have the opportunity to own standard capacity PMAGs prior to the potential implementation of pending legislation that would infri…nge on their Second Amendment Rights. The program will be open to all responsible CO residents, (with both billing and shipping addresses inside CO) and provide access to a limited quantity of PMAGs. Remember to contact members of the Senate and the Governor prior to ordering and urge them to oppose HB 1224.Full details at http://www.magpul.com/coloradoSimilar to the Berlin Airlift, the Boulder Airlift will bring much needed supplies to freedom-loving residents trapped inside occupied territory. While we plan to initially use FedEx or UPS instead of aerial delivery, we figure that $5 flat rate shipping will make up for any loss of “style points.” The increases we have made and continue to make in production capacity will allow us to open this program with very minimal impact on the number of PMAGs we are shipping to our dealers and distributors out of the state. We are also aware that Colorado is not the only state with existing or pending magazine capacity restrictions; we are working on programs for other affected states as well.See More
Comment by alt0182 — March 2, 2013 @ 5:17 am
North Idaho has open arms to any and all firearm, ammunition or accessory manufacture who wants to re-locate to a friendly community. We are going so far as to pass legislation that would make all abel-bodied adults a part of the state militia. So come one, come all!
Comment by Ed — March 2, 2013 @ 5:54 am
I fully support the decision of the companies to NOT do business with the government agency and there employees that find that certain weapons, magazines are illegal but think it is OK for them to have them. I would also like to see the ammunition companies of these type weapons stop selling to these government agencies who will put there ammo in the magazines and weapons that the state governments decide is illegal for there tax paying citizens.
Please add MARYLAND to your list and Berretta who manufactures guns in Maryland needs to move out as well and start speaking out.
If it illegal for tax paying citizens to own than it should also be illegal for the state goverment to have them as well as the military
Comment by Larry Reeae — March 2, 2013 @ 6:16 am
It is great to see the Firearm industry standing up for the 2nd Amendment and the Citizens that the 2nd Amendment is suppose to protect. I stand by them 100% as well as the NRA. My only wish now is to have the involvement of the Ammunition Manufactures in this boycott.
I would first hope they would quit sending ammunition to Federal entities that really have no other purpose than to take ammunition out of the hands of honest citizens. Thank you one and all for this endeavor of protecting us against all those that took the oath of office, “TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AGAINST ALL ENEMIES BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC”, it seems for many elected officials these are just empty words.
Comment by iowahawk — March 2, 2013 @ 6:23 am
My home state of Tennessee not only needs the jobs but is relatively sane in their interpretation of the second amendment. The people here are hard workers and would whole-heartedly support you business should you decide to relocate. There are vendors through-out the state who cannot keep product on shelves, many of whom would would be happy to have an in-state source of product.
I feel that the stance you are taking is one of the best and most effective ways for us to work to retain our constitutional rights under the second amendment.
Bravo! and thank you so for your support.
Comment by Oliver Delong — March 2, 2013 @ 6:23 am
I think CHEAPER THAN DIRT should have a web page of the companies that will NOT do business with the federal government (and a link to their web pages so we can do business with them) and the state governments, then also show the companies that WILL (along with email address so we can tell them what we think) so we will then know NOT to do business with them.
Comment by Larry Reeae — March 2, 2013 @ 6:27 am
I applaud these companies taking a stand. I live in NY and hope that ALL firearm manufacturers follow suit. But we need big companies to do it also. I highly support the idea that if we cant have them then neither can the government. And it doesnt just apply to firearms. Ammo, magazines included too.
Comment by Jason — March 2, 2013 @ 6:29 am
I’m very proud of what the company’s are doing. Personally I think the should take it a step further and an just refuse all sales of any type of firearm or ammunition to any government agency. Just cut them off. The 2nd amendment is very clear and is non negotiable. Seems like the government wants to sell us to china. Send all are troops to bufu and Strip the american public of our guns. What and who left to protect us? Obama care? Tax increases? Sky rocketing gas prices?….They need to clean up the mess they created with the economy and bring jobs back to the states and fix schools instead of putting more hard working people out of business and jobs. I will not give up my guns with out a fight… We the people by the people for the people. Why are we letting the curropt pollitions dictate our lives. This used to be a free contry and everyday I feel less free….
Comment by Jeremy — March 2, 2013 @ 6:43 am
I will make these companies , my fist pick , from now on! A nobler statement,never made ;to show their support for us. The government and some le have gotten their Britches to big! They serve , the public;not ,the other way! My hat is of , an God speed!
Comment by Rik Atwell — March 2, 2013 @ 6:49 am
I am a law abiding citizen and love my country. We have rights that many other countries cannot comprehend. I served seven years of my life in the armed services to defend these rights. Our forefathers wrote the 2nd amendment with a purpose in mind. I stand behind the companies that choose not to sell to states that take away gun ownership rights. Let’s take it a step further and refuse as citizens to purchase any firearms from any gun manufacturer that deals in the gun banned states.
Comment by Larry — March 2, 2013 @ 6:54 am
The amount of respect I have for the gun companies taking a stand can not be accurately described. I hope to see more of the gun companies, companies that make shooting products in general, pull together to form a cooperative group, to show these states that are passing legislation, to make guns illegal for their residents to own and use, just how important the gun companies are to these states, the economies of these states, and the safety of their residents. It is not my desire to see a bunch of companies that produce guns and gun accessories move from their states, as that will cause much harm to their employees. It is my desire to see the combined efforts of all to squash this ridiculous anti-gun legislation within the states. If you own a gun, and do not belong to the NRA, you are not part of the solution, please join now.
Comment by Ryan Roberts NRA Life Member — March 2, 2013 @ 6:56 am
Its nice to see big firearm company’s standing for what they beleave in even if it’ll hurt there sales.
Comment by Thomas — March 2, 2013 @ 7:00 am
I’m glad we have manufactures that are making a political stand. But if they don’t do it now, they might be run out of business anyway.
Comment by James Stamper — March 2, 2013 @ 7:00 am
I stopped hunting and fishing in Canada when they began registering long arms at the border. Although Remington employs 1300 in my district of NY, I would support their move out of state, as I would any other firearm or accessory manufacturer that moves. Sorry to say, but this issue has divided America into two camps, and I am seriously considering leaving for a friendlier atmosphere, along with them. Vote with your feet…
Comment by T. Riso — March 2, 2013 @ 7:01 am
Support companies that are trying to ensure the govt has to live within its own laws? Heck, I want to BE them! These are the modern day equivalents of Patrick Henry, John Adams, and all the Patriots who pledged their lives and fortunes to the cause of freedom from tyranny! God bless them. I say let’s all write to those who’ve been elected to perform a function in the govt of the people, by the people, and for the people to let them know that they suck at their jobs. Let’s point out to them that their track record is abysmal (falling victim to their own sequester trap only the latest in a long line of examples). And let’s put them on notice that, because of what we know and see, we choose not to rely on the govt for our individual protection. In the next natural disaster, we’ll turn out to help and protect our neighbors while they fart around with political score keeping. When the next wacko decides to live out his video game hero fantasies in real life, we’ll be on hand to take him out while the police (God bkess them, too) log their 911 call and flip on their sirens. Oh, and for good measure, let’s make sure
that not one blinking incumbent gets to keep his job for the next 3 election cycles!
Comment by Jeff — March 2, 2013 @ 7:04 am
I fully support all of the above actions by the firearm and accessory manufacturers. I think “straw” purchases, which are subsequently transferred to these state agencies should also fall under this ban as well. We must fight back against this power grab now! We should organize a million person march in Washington and really have 1 million show up.
Comment by Mark Lord — March 2, 2013 @ 7:04 am
Here in Maryland last night debate on gun control, the pro gun people out weighted the anti gun people by a margin of 45 to 1. Still our governor wants to ram this bill down our throats. One interesting fact is that Governor O’Malley will let Beretta, who makes guns in Charles county in Maryland, keep making guns and selling them outside of Maryland, although some of those guns will be ban in Maryland.
Comment by Lee Robinson — March 2, 2013 @ 7:15 am
As I read some of the comments I am moved with all the passionate and sincere comments. I see this issue going way beyond gun control, this is about our freedom and the rights granted to us by our forefathers. God bless this country but not the anti-gun politicians.
Comment by Lee Robinson — March 2, 2013 @ 7:23 am
I live in Kansas and would love for gun makers to come to Kansas. Kansas is in the process of limiting the Federal Government power by passes laws that would allow gun owners to keep their guns regardless of the Federal Law. Anyone that lives in Colorado and doesn’t like their new gun laws move to Kansas.
Comment by Craig — March 2, 2013 @ 7:23 am
I appluad all the companies for taking a stand against the trampling of the 2nd amendment. But, the one thing I notice is that it seems that they are only refusing to do business with LEA,s in the state in which they are based. They need to say they will not do business with ANY state that restricts the rights of their citizens. We also need to get the BIG boys on board, Remington,S&W,Colt,Springfield,Beretta etc.
Comment by Steve Ritchie — March 2, 2013 @ 7:30 am
As a federal law enforcement officer assigned to the state of New York, I find the actions of these companies despicable! We didn’t ask to come to NY, we were assigned here. Just because we are in law enforcement, doesn’t mean we get whatever tools we need. For the most part, we purchase our own gear. My agency still use the Vietnam era magazines and rifles. So we purchase our own magazine and rifles to save not only our lives but the citizens we serve. We do not seize weapons from law abiding citizens but felons who ruin it for everyone and has no business owning a weapon. We are not saying we are better than the citizens we serve so we should be able to purchase certain type of weapons while they can not. We understand why certain manufacturers feel this way. It’s because whenever the president makes a speech about gun control, there is a swarm of law enforcement standing behind him. Let me tell you that they were chosen by the heads of an agency that are political figures themselves, and not the officers that are out there doing all the grunt work. It’s easy to bash law enforcement. For most of us, coming across a law enforcement officer is never a good experience. You are either getting a ticket or something terrible has happened. For that,we are sorry. But please, don’t enact policies that hurt us because of the actions or our politicians. Thank you
Comment by Paul — March 2, 2013 @ 7:32 am
You’re darned skippy I support the companies that refuse to do business with government entities that make these things illegal. I would also welcome them with open arms to my state, should they decide that they would like to move here. Hell, I’d probably see if they’d hire me.
I think that the officers would then be at a disadvantage on the streets, but then again – they are civilians just like us; if they are disadvantaged, then so are we. Unfortunately, the criminal is not, which is more the reason we need to show the states that their emotional capitalization on a tragedy to push their agendas of people control will not be tolerated. There has to be some way to show that there are repercussions when the force their personal agendas down our throats.
Comment by Christopher Sage — March 2, 2013 @ 7:35 am
I have to give props to Ronnie Barrett for doing this very early on with California. I believe a comprehensive list should be published by every gun related website such as AR15.com, NRA, etc. that allows users to quickly see a matrix of which companies stop doing business with tyrannical entities. Although it would be very risky, I think companies that do a lot of business with the military should threaten sales to them as well. Since the US doesn’t make it’s own guns, it would really escalate this into a national security issue.
Fortunately I live in a gun friendly state. If I lived in a ban State, I would make it a family priority to move, even if the logistics were painful. My family had to escape from a communist country and I see this as being along the same lines.
Comment by Miro — March 2, 2013 @ 7:40 am
And Paul…thank you for your service
In general, I would agree that we shouldn’t limit you guys – and that we should be able to have access to the same gear. Unfortunately, this is probably one of the few ways to show the politicians that these actions will not be tolerated. The state governments are always trying to lure in businesses for the tax revenue, and if they threaten to leave, that hurts their income and then they won’t be able to do all the wasteful (and helpful) things that they want to do.
Hopefully this will encourage those governments to stop pushing personal agendas in violation of the Constitution. Yes, we can try to vote them out, but some people (like that jackass Bloomberg) somehow stays in office (lots and lots of money helps in that department, I’m sure). And with most of the large cities being mostly democrat, it’s hard to get them to *not* elect a democrat – which means a lot more gun/people control agendas being pushed at this sensitive time.
Comment by Christopher Sage — March 2, 2013 @ 7:43 am
My wife and I travel west every year for at least two ski trips. We cancelled our second trip to Colorado this year. We were having some scheduling problems and when we considered all the foolish things going on in that state regarding firearms, the decision to cancel the trip was rather easy.
We normally spend 4 to 6 thousand dollars on each trip. I hope more people start to consider not vacationing in anti-gun states. We have already decided that next year’s ski trips will be to Utah and possibly Montana.
Oh yeah, as a compensation to myself for not getting that second ski trip this year, I’m getting ready to go out to the local gun store and by a new 357 revolver (I haven’t owned a revolver in many years)and as much ammo for it as they will sell me.
Comment by Jim — March 2, 2013 @ 7:51 am
Firearm, ammo, accessory manufactures as well as suppliers should not only refuse to sell to any governmental organization (or members of that organization) any item that is restricted to a normal citizen of that state. These manufacturers and suppliers should strongly and publicly consider moving out of a state that bans any of their products to its citizens. And, most importantly shooters in other states should think very strongly about the purchase of items from manufactures or suppliers that maintain operations in states that ban items to their own citizens.
Comment by Warren Cohen — March 2, 2013 @ 7:59 am
I am very happy to see that there are still individuals that will stand up for their rights. I first heard about this on a video blog by Molotov Mitchell and he was praising these companies for be proactive. I would love to see any and all manufactures come to the great state of Tennessee and set up shop. We have passed the Fireamrs Freedom Act and if up held Inwould like to see as many firearms and accessories built here as possible. Well done Cheaper Than Dirt and every other manufacturer that is being proactive in this battle for our constitutional rights.
Comment by Bert — March 2, 2013 @ 7:59 am
Not, just yes, but H#LL YES! Proudly own an Olympic Arms AR-15. My oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, doesn’t end when I take off my uniform at the of the day. These companies understand the true meaning of the Second Admendment, that the freedom and security of our nation belongs in the hands of law-abiding citizens.
Comment by Erik — March 2, 2013 @ 8:02 am
Plenty of room out here in Texas DPMS. Trust me, you will be welcomed with millions of open arms!!!! I just can’t grasp how politicians believe making it illegal for law abiding citizens to own a particular type of gun will effect criminal activity. Cocaine is illegal, methamphetamine is illegal anyone starting to see a point here?
Comment by John Hudson — March 2, 2013 @ 8:07 am
I will support any gun, or accessory manufacturer, and gun or accessory dealers, that will restrict Law enforcement sales to what their locality restricts their privwte citizens to. Furthermore, I will NOT purchase from companies that do NOT jump on board, and join the fight in doing so. I would also like to see ammunition manufactures, cut off sales to ALL federal agencies, and any local L.E. that is hostile to the 2nd Ammendment. The civilian population will gladly buy up that ammunition, as it is now unavailable, due to a government maufactured crisis, playing off the tragedy of Sandy Hook. As far as manufacturers relocated? Come on down to the Tennessee home of Ronnie Barret and company. Doesn’t get anymore friendly than here.
Comment by 1rebelyankee — March 2, 2013 @ 8:19 am
Where is Glock in this effort? The Maryland State Police use Glock. Maryland is considering some of the most oppressive gun legislation in the Nation. Beretta is threatening to move out of Maryland. BUT… I hear nothing from Glock! Where are they in the defense of the rights of their largest patrons? I hope we hear something soon! They should be telling Maryland no more support if anti-2A legislation passes!!
Comment by Don — March 2, 2013 @ 8:25 am
I certainly agree. If some of the ammo would start to divert some of the ammo they’re shipping to DHS and other federal agencies they certainly wouldn’t suffer much business loss. Has anyone tried to buy some 5.56 of 9mm lately? It’s three to four times the cost if you can get it. Come on Ammo manufacturers and step up to the plate and support the second ammandment.
Comment by Charles — March 2, 2013 @ 8:34 am
Here in Iowa, we would welcome firearm manufacturers and magazine manufacturers with open arms. There are many communities that would love having a new business in the area that support our second amendment rights.
Comment by Matt — March 2, 2013 @ 8:35 am
I think Ruger could easily move its Connecticut operation to its facility in Prescott, Arizona. The only problem being that they are already back ordered a number of months and the move would put them a couple of more months behind on the products being produced in Connecticut. Beretta is already threatening to leave Maryland completely. They moved one of their warehouses into northern Virginia already, and old man Beretta is getting tired of the BS from Maryland legislators. Many of these firearms manufacturers could move to Texas or Florida and save a fortune in taxes, and regulatory requirements.
Comment by Lt Scrounge — March 2, 2013 @ 8:38 am
This is simply outstanding and I am heartened by the actions of these companies. To answer the two questions, yes, I support the decision of firearm companies, whether weapons or accessories, in the decision to move to states that are friendly to the firearms industry. Go for it!
Second, I am in full support of these same companies not selling to LE agencies in states that restrict the 2nd amendment rights of the citizens. What a marvelous concept.
Thank you to those companies engaged in both practices. You can bet that when I need something in the lines they offer I will look to them first.
Comment by C. T. Tate II — March 2, 2013 @ 8:41 am
Thank You, I will purchase and fully support any manufacturer proving to be Americans and the rights written in the United States Constitution. God bless .
Comment by Papa214 — March 2, 2013 @ 8:44 am
Hell yea tell all the gov.agencies to kiss somthing that has a crack in it,and i dont mean the liberty bell !!!!!!!!!!!!! all of you fine patreotic gun manufacturers are more than welcom to come and set up shop right here in louisiana.we have enough gun lovers here to keep yall in buisness. LOVE MY GUNS AND MY RIGHT TO KEEP THEM !!!!!!!
Comment by R. OLA — March 2, 2013 @ 8:53 am
Come to Michigan. We need the jobs, and we have thousands of laid off former GM workers who have skills.
Comment by jim — March 2, 2013 @ 8:56 am
At age 62, I have had ample time to observe the degradation of American society, and the increasingly oppressive measures our government implements to gain a strengthening “upper hand” over its citizens. I’m a veteran, and I have watched the incremental take-away of freedoms we all once had. Yet our leadership (if that’s what you can call them) still spouts the rhetorical freedom phrase on a regular basis. I ask myself regularly – where’s the freedom? So do I agree with the approach being taken by industry to counter the oppression. Hell yes. In fact, I’d take it much further.
Industry has the right to charge what they wish for products. Why not charge government ten times… or twenty times the rate offered to general citizens… call it a company-imposed “anti-regulatory” fee for anything they wish to purchase. I recommend ammunition makers use this as a means of reducing citizens’ cost. I could ramble on, but this should get the creative juices flowing.
Comment by Vern — March 2, 2013 @ 9:00 am
My utmost respect and admiration to Mr. Bob Reynolds, president of Templar Custom, Inc., who said, “We will not sell arms to agents of the state of New York that hold themselves to be ‘more equal’ than their citizens.”…………………… BRAVO SIR !!!
As a person who believes in the 2nd amendment I will do every thing in my power to purchase any item I need from companies like yours who are taking a stand in what’s right. Again Sir, I Thank You for your courage.
All the public needs now is for someone to create a list of companies who have taken a stand, so others like me, will do business with only them so we can show our
support towards companies like yours.
Comment by Mr Wayne S. Bloch — March 2, 2013 @ 9:07 am
I support, 100%, the premise of state gov. equal to its people. I, also, believe that Fed gov be held to the same standards. What ever the people are not allowed to have all Gov. is banned from having. The 2nd amendment state that premise to the letter.
Comment by Dale Single — March 2, 2013 @ 9:08 am
Leave Cal and leave NY, Washington State will take you in.
And a big Thank You to those who are supporting the Constitution by not knuckling under to the folks in DC.
Comment by MSG John Laigaie — March 2, 2013 @ 9:12 am
I completely support these companies who have taken a stand against tyranny. I currently live in gun-hating CA (and I grew up in NY). Even though I have family back there, I’m not moving back; at least not until they free the state residents. If our clueless leaders in Sacramento persist in making several million law-abiding gun owners felons with their latest idiotic laws, I will be leaving this state as soon as my daughter finishes high school in a year.
Sadly, we had been considering CO as a place to land. But with this latest round of stupidity in the CO state legislature, we will probalby head somewhere else more friendly to things like the Constitution. I’ve already written to all the members of the CO Judiciary Committee informing them that not only will we not be moving or visiting there, but we’ll also not be doing business with any company located there.
Voting with dollars seems to be the only thing politicians listen to,
Comment by Mike Sessler — March 2, 2013 @ 9:16 am
I totally agree with this stance and will support the companies that take this stand with my future purchases. As a citizen of Alabama we would welcome any of these companies here and I will be willing to donate 10% of my commission earned, to NRA and another 10% to the Pro-gun group of their choice, on any real estate that they want to buy in the state of Alabama, if I am the agent representing either buyer or seller. I will also lobby our state government for tax abatements to move your company here. The people of Alabama or hard workers and would make excellent employees. I will also extend the above offer to any employee of these companies that wish to transfer here with their company.
It is time for us to stand up for our rights and to tell the Government that work for us and not the other way around.
Comment by Sam Heflin — March 2, 2013 @ 9:17 am
I think everyone should boycott All products and companies in states with restrictive rights on there people.
Yes it will hurt, but just maybe more then just firearms and related companies will relocate to more business friendly states.
And I will not do business with any company that sells any thing to the Fed Government or LE in restrictive states.
Comment by Sammy — March 2, 2013 @ 9:36 am
I fully support the companies that are respectful enough of their civilian customers to refuse sales to LE and Federal entities that would not allow the average, law abiding gun owner to purchase the same weapons. I wish Glock, Sig Sauer and the other high volume LE sales companies would jump on board. If CA could no longer purchase >10 round magazines for the LE community, or new Glocks, they perhaps may consider easing the gun restrictions. Many of us buy guns simply because we are fascinated with them and enjoy the shooting sport. We have one or two for necessity (defense, carry) and the rest are just a collection of things we like and have a RIGHT to own. Our own government would appreciate our collections if we were to be invaded because the millions of gun owners with more firearms than they can field, could arm their neighbors who would be willing to defend America, even though they do not own their own weapons.
Furthermore, if our government truly is verging on tyranny, it is important for the citizenry to be adequately equipped to fight such tyranny, as required by our Constitution.
Comment by Zak Taylor — March 2, 2013 @ 9:39 am
Powerful Nebraska stands firm in our 2nd Amendment Defense; and to welcome manufacturers of defense products to our State. We are still an island of calm
and common sense. WELCOME MAGPUL, DPMS and all others who face tyranny in your state!
Comment by Philip Michel — March 2, 2013 @ 9:41 am
I have and will continue to fully support these manufactures. To take this further if a company does not embrace this stand and start fighting for what is right, I will no longer be supporting these companies with my money. Although doing the right thing often comes at a cost a smaller earnings report is NOTHING compared to the sacrifices our forefathers made.
Comment by e ford — March 2, 2013 @ 9:43 am
Absolutetly! I am happy to see these companies taking a stand for freedom. The Second Ammendment was deemed necessary by our founders to prevent precisely what Cuomo did and especially the way he did it. It is time for the “citizens” of the USA to present our elected “representatives” with concequences for their abuse of power.
I think the New York State Sportsmen need to follow the example of the firearms companies and “not buy hunting or fishing licenses this year” Hit them in their pocketbook and they will listen; that’s all they care about and is the true motive for this gun issue. They are creating “more revenue” not a safer country.
Comment by Joseph Kobas — March 2, 2013 @ 9:43 am
These bans should be against all Federal and State agency’s – especially on ammo. While the Feds buy in the billions we are left with no ammo on the shelf.
Comment by Thomas Johnston — March 2, 2013 @ 9:57 am
I AGREE TOTALLY NOT SELLING TO LE IN STATES THAT WON’T SELL TO CITIZENS.
I ALSO WISH OUR AMMO MANUFACTURING WOULD QUIT SELLING TO THE GOVERNMENT
OF THESE STATES THAT BAN AR’S AND HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES.RIGHT NOW THE
GOVERNMENT HAS 1.7 BILLION ROUNDS OF AMMO FOR WHAT.SO YOU CAN’T FIND ANY
AND WHEN YOU DO YOU CAN’T AFFORD IT.THIS IS ANOTHER EFFORT TO HURT THE
CITIZENS AND YOUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS. NO AMMO USELESS GUNS.
Comment by MARK FUGLER — March 2, 2013 @ 10:00 am
I am 75 years old and have watched this country’s government deteriorate for many years. I fully support any manufacturers or distributors that take the second amendment seriously, seriously.
To LEO Paul: I fully trust and respect the officers in the field. This movement isn’t intended to make your work any harder or dangerous. It is simply to force legislators to start standing by their oaths of office in regards to our Constitution. I would be more than happy to back you up in any situation where you were endangered, but I want to be armed at least as well as our common enemies. I am as concerned as anyone about the mass slaughter of people and feel deep sympathy for them and their families, but stiff gun control laws have never worked to reduce those heinous crimes and only suffice to disarm the good guys, or to make them criminals by default.
Comment by Hytekhik — March 2, 2013 @ 10:10 am
As an LEO in the state of Texas and a veteran, I cannot believe that so many are overreacting to these proposed laws. I wholly support the second amendment. So fine, I won’t purchase these rifles from the manufactures that won’t support the protection of lives that the citizens of my town and state have appointed me to protect. I won’t go to the school, the mall, or the Luby’s where someone who has decided to take lives with a rifle that has been illegally acquired to which I have nothing but a pistol to defend those individuals or myself. I know let’s put a bell tower on the middle of Dallas that would call to arms the people who do have access to this rifles, so they can defend those scared and huddled masses of children tucked up away from the shooters. Or since technology is very useful, let’s send out a text alert, and hope that people can show up at a moment’s notice to defend the sons, daughters, mothers and fathers that are in shock at what is happening and are to afraid to move to save their own lives. Hell, I might as well just give up my post.
Some feel that every manufacturer of goods that military and law enforcement use to defend this nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic, should refuse to provide those products to those who defend the Constitution of the United States or the State Constitutions. Asinine and idiotic. I promise to rush into the movie theater where your brothers and sisters are being gunned down with my wooden baton swinging. Maybe I will make it so my son can wake up with me the next day in his life.
, continue to update the list of people my brothers, sisters and I don’t need to support or defend, so I may move on to those who actually want it.
Comment by James Clark — March 2, 2013 @ 10:12 am
I am all for restricting sales to the self chosen “elite”. I would encourage all firearm, accessory & ammunition manufactures to move out the free america of Arizona, Utah, Idaho, and other such states.
Comment by Steven Shipman — March 2, 2013 @ 10:14 am
Now if the ammo companies would just stop selling to the Feds. The same Feds who would eventually turn that ammo back on us, or at the VERY least is buying it with our money in order to prevent us from buying it. I know it’s tough to turn down a sale of millions of rounds but ultimately it would be in those companies best interest to do so.
Comment by Kenneth Cherevko — March 2, 2013 @ 10:15 am
i absolutely agree with and support these companies in there actions. the next wave i would like to see is from the manufacturers of ammunition, especially with all the ammo we are seeing bought by the feds. they are up to what now……like 2 billion + rounds of various calibers. calibers and bullet designs obviously to be used in a domestic setting. maybe all the patriots will move out of these commie states and make room for all libs and “progressives” to take there place. any company or individual supporting america and its constitution and bill of rights is welcome here NC.
Comment by aaron — March 2, 2013 @ 10:23 am
I give bug KUDO’s to every gun company that stands up for the 2nd Amendment buy not selling to LE & Govt Agencies that restrict the People from owning those guns. I hope DPMS comes to WISCONSIN , A state where each year 700,000 – 800,000 plus Deer hunters take to the woods with rifles of all types. Wiscosin is a very friendly pro gun, pro business state…
Comment by Bronson Smith — March 2, 2013 @ 10:25 am
All of the anti-gun rhetoric from the Left ignores the fact that, were it not for gun “violence”, Dianne Feinstein would just be another political wanna-be. Why shouldn’t citizens have the same access to protection that Law Enforcement has ?? If a (standard) 15-round magazine is “adequate” for Law Enforcement, why should the public be restricted to ten…or seven ?? Hoorah for the manufacturers who are pushing back, especially in New York. Here in California, a Third-World country at best, those of us who actually pay taxes and don’t live off the government applaud such a stance. If I were a manufacturer and was trying to do business here, I’d be relocating as quick as was possible.
Comment by William Campbell — March 2, 2013 @ 10:39 am
The 100 companies now refusing to do business with those LE and government agencies in states that are trying to repeal our inalienable right to keep and bear arms is a good start. Let’s hope that the other hundreds of US companies get on that band wagon too.
Comment by Popper29 — March 2, 2013 @ 10:44 am
I applaud and commend any and all firearms and accessory manufacturers who demonstrate the courage and conviction of principles reflected in these actions. May we, as citizens and customers fail to support such bold patriotism? Our forefathers pledged their fortunes and sacred honor to the cause of Liberty. Have we become callous and craven? I am sure the state of Kentucky would welcome any of these companies to the “Kentucky Rifle” state.
Comment by G.W. Smither — March 2, 2013 @ 10:44 am
I TOTALLY AGREE. STAND UP TO THE STATES THAT TAKE AWAY CITIZENS RIGHTS. DON’T PURCHASE ANYTHING OR VISIT THESE STATES FOR VACATION.SOMEWHERE THE DOLLAR FACTOR WILL TRICKLE INTO THE EQUATION,I WOULD HOPE.PLEASE STAY INFORMED AND DO ALL YOU CAN TO HELP.
Comment by MARK FUGLER — March 2, 2013 @ 10:47 am
Stalin – Marxist Socialism, and Beria’s NKVD.
Hitler – National Socialism, and Himmler’s Gestapo.
Obama – Democratic Socialism, and Napolitano’s Homeland Severity.
If government fears honest citizens arming themselves at their own expense, it should. A burden of citizenship is being individually willing and able to defend yourself, your family, your property, and your country against all threats. Politicians’ flashy mediocrity holds a vast audience diligently converting glitter into a tyranny of immersive falsehoods.
SUPPORT EVOLUTION – SHOOT BACK.
Comment by Al Schwartz — March 2, 2013 @ 10:50 am
I commend these manufactures and dealerships. I think it is about time that “We the People” need to only do business with those that support these kind of acts. I know that as of this date, I will no longer buy any products nor will I do any type of business from any agency that does not support the same as do these businesses.
Comment by Harold Newell GySgt USMC retired — March 2, 2013 @ 10:53 am
I could not agree more with these companies.I hope many more will follow their lead.They will get my business.
Comment by Rick — March 2, 2013 @ 11:16 am
I too applaud and respect all the companies that take a stand against selling in states that are anti-Second Amendment — including law enforcement. I would like to see ALL manufactures and dealers stop selling in any anti-Second Amendment. That would be a game-changer with the public in those states and a warning to other.
Comment by Tom Conley — March 2, 2013 @ 11:22 am
I live in Colorado and have been writing all the state reps opposing the bills before us. I have also been stocking up on high capacity magazines, even for guns I don’t own yet, like an SKS. The Beta Company is prioritizing orders for us unfortunate Coloradans. Thank you! I think I’ll order another one just because of the excellent service I’ve received.
To Mike Sessler (above): Please don’t stop doing business with Colorado companies just because of the lawmakers. Magpul is caught up in the middle of this, as they are located in the Republic of Boulder, Colorado. They have recently started Operation “Boulder Airlift: PMAGs for Coloradans” Even though I probably have enough PMAG gen3 magazines now, I plan on supporting them and buying even more.
We have also started a magazine wrapper campaign over at AR-15.co (not .com) where we are mailing in magazine wrappers to our lawmakers. Please support and send us your empty magazine wrappers!
http://www.ar-15.co/threads/91753-PMAG-Magazine-Wrapper-Campaign-SPREAD-THE-WORD
Comment by Alan Peterson — March 2, 2013 @ 11:28 am
I have tried buy ammo of all calibers and have paid triple prices for them, and I have tried buying a 223 semi=auto and they are price WAY above anything I can afford, thank you obamation and feincrap, I agree any ammo they do sell to the government would be bought be Americans, same with the guns.
Comment by Cat — March 2, 2013 @ 11:29 am
I have found it very interesting that 736 other American’s response feel that what CTD and the other companies are doing is the right thing to do. I read the additional comments made about Beretta, mainly the that they are considering moving to a more favorable state to which some politician said they could make a deal with Beretta to stay in Maryland bull, come to Alabama we have a legislature and Govenor that know what the 2d Amendment means.
Comment by Don Hammond — March 2, 2013 @ 11:32 am
I am so glad to see all this support for companies refusing to sell to state agencies that institute bans. I agree and support them and am happy to do what I can to help them with their stance that costs them revenue and will happily pay extra for their products. I myself have urged the CEO of Ruger to join the cause and urge all gun owners to get Colt on board with this stance. I have not seen a statement from them in regards to sales to these states. I also hope that Magpull follows through with their stance to leave CO, even though I know full well that it will be a detriment to our economy. Our lawmakers do not understand that criminals have never followed the law. So let local law enforcement fight back with only the weapons the criminals are allowed to get. A ban in s ban and no one person or agency should be exempted by it. I will do my part to get Chickencooper out of office in 2014 and take back CO as a state that respects the rights handed down to us by our nations forefathers over 200 years ago. Vote the liberals out. Because they won’t stop with the 2nd amendment. They’ll take every right we have if we keep them in office.
Comment by Scott Pilotte — March 2, 2013 @ 11:39 am
I think the time has come for a new Constitutional Amendment: Any state that passes regulations that restrict or deny It’s citizens the right to keep and bear arms or imposes prohibitive taxes or fees on ownership of these weapons or purchase of ammunition for said weapons will be either peacefully or forcefully removed from the Union of these United States.
Comment by Joe Burke — March 2, 2013 @ 11:43 am
Yes, I support the efforts of those companies that take a stand at the cost of sales and profits, and I will make an effort to purchase from those companies.
Remember that if they refuse to sell to municipalities and agengies who have large budgets, and spend large amounts on arms from these same suppliers, those sales, or at least the profits that would have come from those sales, need to be made us by sales to US.
Fewer sales at “retail” prices to us will go a long way towards supporting the lost profits from sales at “contract” prices to governmental agencies, so WE CAN (and must) MAKE a difference by supporting those companies who have taken a stand. Otherwise, they will not survive, or must change their position to survive. Who wins then? The anti-second amendment folks. Who loses? All of us.
Comment by RD — March 2, 2013 @ 11:47 am
Im sure everyone agrees & supports the new responses by the arms companies, as do I.
This is right out of ‘Atlas shrugged’ the novel by ayn rand in 1957. It depicted a future socialist police /welfare state of america in which these actions were taken by the resisters, ( such as we)and also where companies/owners had to secretly relocate to a hidden free zone to do business with only other free types while leaving the rest of america to collapse in its own demise. It seemed crazy at the time, but is actually understated now with the new “patriot act’. ( Think orwells 1984 ‘newspeak’ where the definitions are reversed).I myself as a business owner in wa state have seen my renewal fee go up 2500% per year while the state spends 900 mill on illegals each year.
Im buying a retreat in another state and look for gun /freedom laws as outlined in ‘retreat & relocation’ by j. rawles and by j. skousen. why stay put in a state where you have already lost your rights? an armed person is a citizen, and an unarmed person is a subject. I am an original hippie by the way & I think that the system is dividing the left & right to push its nwo agenda. everyone should look past the differences and work together against the common enemy of tyranny, and then bicker in a free environment.
Comment by amante — March 2, 2013 @ 11:48 am
We welcome your business in Texas. The regulatory climate is business-friendly; the customers are waiting. So, y’all come on down!
Comment by Theresa — March 2, 2013 @ 11:57 am
I fully agree with the manufacturers who have taken this stance and I will send whatever business their way that I can. I will ask our state representatives to offer incentives to any firearms/ammunition/accessories company that might consider a relocation to my state. I am very tired of our legislators who are acting more like our keepers than our employed representatives and strongly agree and support Mr. Reynolds statement and position. For some time it has been looking more and more Orwellian in this country with the self-appointed better element placing themselves above and separate from the rest of us. With apologies to Ben Franklin, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little (perceived) temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety….
Comment by Michael Ouimette — March 2, 2013 @ 12:13 pm
I must say that restrictions on magazines may be past due. After all the Constitution was written over two hundred years ago at a time when the founders could have no idea of the gains in technological achievement. If the Constitution truly is a living breathing document, then it must reflect todays realities. At the time of the founding, the press meant printing one page at a time using a manual printing press. There was no instant worldwide reporting of information on mis-information. I support a ban not only on magazines, but on newspapers and television “news” as well, for if the second amendment can be infringed upon it is only fair that freedom of the press should be limited as well. All joking aside, I do not support any new restrictions on the first, second or any amendments in the Bill of Rights but I do think some of the arguments put forth by the media should met with this type of rebuttal. I support those in the firearms industry’s decisions to move from states that are not friendly to them and to restrict their sales to those states’ government agencies as well. I would encourage the entire industry to adopt policies as described in the article. The second amendment was included because guns already existed and sometimes bad people had them, sometimes bad people are in government. “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”
― James Madison, The Federalist Papers
Comment by Tim Reilly — March 2, 2013 @ 12:23 pm
Hats off to all manufacturers putting there money were there mouths are and standing up for the American people and the Second Amendment . They have my moral support and my business . I also would like to see the American people Stand up and stop supporting any Firearms manufactures,Ammunition manufactures,that will not do the same !!
Comment by George — March 2, 2013 @ 12:25 pm
I think this is a great idea. Don’t sell to a state that denies it’s citizens. I’m from NY and fully support this total sellers ban.
If Senator Diane Finestein wants to ban anything scary, then ban all gun related items like uniforms, leather belts and holsters, boots that lace up with more then 7 eyelets, and really scary vehicles with sirens and blinking light like police cars, and police radios.
Comment by Vinnie — March 2, 2013 @ 12:29 pm
I totally agree with all the companies trying to protect my rights; however, after reading alot of these posts I may have to rethink where, and with whom I stand. I do not see god’s name on the 2nd amendment, so i don’t see it as a god given right. It’s a right made by the founding fathers. Also, I play all those video games – need for speed mostly, yet I don’t get in my vette and see how many cops I can get to chase me. My favorite movie has always been First Blood; however, I’ve never seen it fit to go to a small town and take on their inbred police force. Really people, lets quit blaming or trying to pass the blame on to other company’s products, playstations and all the hollywood movie companies. Just like the firearm companies are not to blame. Crazy people are crazy, and nothing we do will change that. Goverment is goverment, always trying to become more powerful, history has proven that. So having said that, it’s not god, it’s not other companies, and quit saying it’s not us, it’s them. Hell, if you guys keep this up we’ll be fighting a ban on computers, tv, movies, mabey even books. Isn’t that just trading the 1st amendment for the 2nd? I STAND BEHIND THE WHOLE BILL OF RIGHTS NOT JUST THE 2nd.
Comment by Dale — March 2, 2013 @ 12:39 pm
I am a Los Angeles County, California Deputy Sheriff and I fully support the current movement by firearms and accessory manufacturers to withhold sales to law enforcement/government agencies in the states that don’t allow their civilians the same rights.
For the record, I am a Patron life member of the NRA and don’t support my sheriff’s view on gun rights and bans. He is a liberal politician first and vehemently anti-gun. For the education of those who read this, I am not allowed to purchase an AR-15 style weapon or any other weapon on the California state ban list. I am not exempt just because I am a peace officer. The exception would be if my sheriff would sign a letter for me to privately own one. However, he refuses to allow his deputies to purchase the same weapons we can access and use during our duties. I’m referring to the AR-15 variants.
We all know the Senator Feinstein hates cops as much as she hates the armed public and the 2nd amendment. She has advocated in the past that we not be allowed to carry a concealed weapon off duty. She will continue her attacks on all of us until we (the people) put an end to her rule and those like her.
In 26 years of real law enforcement duty (mostly working patrol), I have never dealt with an illegal gun incident involving a true law abiding citizen. I am not saying they don’t occur, I am saying that they are so rare, that most cops don’t experience them. Conversely, I can’t even count how many times I have dealt with convicted felons and guns! Many times the same criminals (repeat offenders) I put in jail for gun related crimes. I fear the crooks and gangsters who have guns illegally and use them against cops and the public, but not as much as the liberal politicians and liberal elite gun haters who continue to support the freedoms of criminals, while banning and confiscating our rights.
Their desire to ban all guns and make us completely subservient to them is more of a threat to my liberty, freedom and safety than the armed dirt bag in the street.
I will continue to support our constitution as it was originally intended, and promise the following to my family, friends and the people of the United Sates of America: “I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC.”
Comment by Michael Liberty — March 2, 2013 @ 12:48 pm
Any Company that stand for the Constitution and proclaims their intent to close their doors to selling to anti Constitutional law making Governments and Law enforcement agencies that do not support said Constitution has my business and support. With my heartfelt thank you to those and the ones coming that support our Law of the Land. If they need help moving to a friendly environment I have 40 years as a Machinery Erector and offer my services.
Molon Labe
Comment by Steve Ramsay — March 2, 2013 @ 1:33 pm
Will Colt follow suit?
Hahahha hahahah
Comment by Rambo — March 2, 2013 @ 1:41 pm
Kudos to all companies exercising these restrictions! Although this is more of an symbolic effort, I am sure Mr. Bloomberg’s and Mr. Cuomo’s hired guns are NOT restricted to how many rounds ‘their’ magazines can hold, it none-the-less sends a message!
Ruger, a favorite, and any other gun related manufacturers, please DO MOVE to one of our more hospitable Southern states.
As many have already done, join and support the NRA or another gun rights organization – numbers are the only power! There are millions of gun owners in these states that are run by constitution usurping ‘criminals.’ Ban together and VOTE them out!!
Comment by Jim — March 2, 2013 @ 1:44 pm
Hi folks from Arkansas. I have read your letters on cheaper than dirt. It is good that you folks are standing up with and for us. As for the folks that make and repair fire arms, we will make you feels right at home here in Arkansas. We have the Arkansas River, the great big Mississippi river on the whole east side boundary of Arkansas. We will have a new steel plant coming soon in north east part of Arkansas. I served in the military in the 50′s and 60′s, I was issued a M1 Grand and later M14. I ate with it, slept with each and was my best friend. I never was issued an A.R. and never did think I would like one because of the caliber. I own a tree farm her in L.A. (Lower Arkansas); we have lots of land, trees, rivers, dear, turkey and fish, all you can ask for nest to heaven. So come on down and check us out. Thank you. Red and Rosey from the great stae of Arkansas.
P.S. I purchased a rifle for the wife in January of this year. It was an Olympia A.R. and she loves it. P.P.S. The vice president stated that to stop someone from coming in, you should shoot through the door. Hells fire, I would kill all my dogs; he should know better than that! Have a nice day! (: 4’2U.
Comment by Freddie McKinney — March 2, 2013 @ 2:08 pm
I support those companies that back the 2nd Amendment and, further, literally put their money where their mouths are by not selling to LE in states that are stomping all over our right to own firearms. I would even be willing to pay a surcharge on products that I purchase from these companies. As a resident of AZ, I would welcome those companies and any others that wish to relocate to our great, gun-friendly state.
Formerly from CA, I relocated to AZ because I was so tired of and maddened by the continued surge to the Left of the Socialist Republic of California.
It is only through efforts like these that we can keep the Libtards from confiscating our legally-owned firearms and ammunition. And, make no mistake, that is exactly what they intend to do as they work their way to ruining our great country by trying to turn it in to a European-style Socialist state.
The second front of the ongoing battle against this tyranny is the so-called Mainstream Media. They paint gun owners as wacko, home born terrorists who must be disarmed. With the exception of Fox News and a very few other media outlets, the MSM is conspiring with the Left Wing in government to destroy the Constitution and, with it, any semblance of traditional Conservative values.
Comment by Tim Shanahan — March 2, 2013 @ 2:11 pm
I would love for some of these fine companies to move to South Carolina! State legislators are working to get a law of manufactured in SC would be legal in SC. Get the Feds involved in areas they need to be. Not usurping our rights!
James Anderson
GySgt USMC RET
Comment by James Anderson — March 2, 2013 @ 2:20 pm
I fully support gun and accessory mfrs to relocate to 2nd ammendment friendly states, and to push back to states that violate this trust.
Comment by PeteChandler — March 2, 2013 @ 2:59 pm
Come to Oklahoma
Comment by PeteChandler — March 2, 2013 @ 3:01 pm
I greatly respect the manufacturers for their stance against the states who want to deny its lawful citizens of the constutitional rights to own firearms. I would encourage other commercial entities to do the same and sever their business dealings with the LE/Govt in those states. Let the LE/Govt. agencies in those states learn first hand what it will be liked to NOT have access to firearms, magazines or ammunitions to defend themselves.
Comment by Nghia Tran — March 2, 2013 @ 3:01 pm
Magpul already bitched out. Decided that $ was more important, and is now selling to LE and govt. agencies. Seems politicians aren’t the only sell-outs
Comment by JB — March 2, 2013 @ 4:02 pm
I salute these companies – and I hope they relocate to 2nd Amendment state- I will only do business with those companies that refuse to do dealings LS/Govt within those states that denies their citizens their rights.
Comment by Bob Luebbeert — March 2, 2013 @ 4:40 pm
This is great action on the part of these companies but only a couple that I saw may have an impact on the gov. All the “BIG NAME” companies need to make a stand (Remington, Smith&Wesson, Colt, Hornady and so on). Until this happens, it will not even make a dent in the gov. buying weapons of any kind. The companies are too greedy to make a stand. In the Marine Corps Times, there was an article about the military not having enough rounds to qual. all the men/women from all services..ummmmm, maybe if DHS, the postal service, and all the rest of the ABC gang’s weren’t buying up and hoarding billions of rounds our military could remain up to par with their training standards. I just hope the “Big Boys” hop on board and shut them down once and for all! By the way….come to Kentucky, we would be glad to have ya. Plenty of room to set up business around Rock Castle shooting facilities. How great would that be? (for KY anyway)
Comment by Dave S. — March 2, 2013 @ 4:55 pm
I don’t know if one exists, but there ought to be a database of companies that respect and revere the 2nd Amendment, so we may vote with our wallets and pocketbooks. Maybe a victim of Congress and the White House’s current employment record could find a way to make some money off of this idea.
Comment by Ken Jenkins — March 2, 2013 @ 4:58 pm
First off, move you comment entry block to the top so it more convenient for the reader.
To your point, absolutely support these manufactures who are moving their operations and/or refusing to sell to LE if the state does not allow the same weapons to be sold to citizens. Furthermore, we citizens can have a larger impact by refusing to visit or buy and products in the states imposing restrictions. I’m from VA and absolutely will not spend another dime in MD. I would hope Baretta USA will consider moving their operations out of MD. If not, I’ll not buy another Baretta product. This is a hard stand but these are hard times for gun owners. We must all stand together in solidarity or our rights will be eroded, state by state, day by day.
Comment by Mike — March 2, 2013 @ 5:09 pm
@Mike – Baretta is in the news here in Maryland saying that they will relocate if this Anti-2A legislation passes. The message came across as “We are Baretta, and we don’t play games!” They reminded the Gov that they moved a warehouse to VA in 1990 that last time MD took a run on guns. Baretta states “We are confronted with a state government that wants to ban our products at a time, by the way, when numerous other state governments are courting our investment.” 400 MD jobs and millions of tax revenue is on the line for MD. That’s Baretta’s dog in the fight YET Glock stays quiet and continues to sell to the MD State Police.
Comment by Don — March 2, 2013 @ 5:54 pm
I work in law enforcement and have sworn twice in my life to uphold the Constitution of the United States as well as of my state. I fully support the 2nd Amendment and the efforts of these companies. I believe the non-sworn populous has the same rights to protect themselves as anyone else. Law enforcement should be a visible symbol of law and not above it. We answer to the same law as those we police. It is NOT “us and them.” Lawmen here still count themselves among the people. The most disheartening thing, to me, is to see people have to worry that “we” will be sent for their guns one day. I won’t be coming for them, nor enforcing any law that conflicts with the US Constitution.
Comment by Bergeron — March 2, 2013 @ 5:58 pm
I, as do the authors of the 781 earlier submissions, completely support the actions of the companies making a stand for our 2d Amendment rights. A mix of bold leadership, patriotism, and astute business ethics, are fueling their actions. I too agree that more of the “big dogs” in the industry should muster the “testoserone” to join the cause and help lead us to victory over an insideous foe.
The liberals have again shown their penchant for distorting facts and lying to the American public. Anyone with an IQ above phytoplankton abhors the Newtown incident where children were killed. The libs have again, as some earlier submitters accounted, distorted the facts, so I’d like to reduce the argument down so even the most liberal of liberals can comprehend.
While the liberal, anti-gun nutcakes are raving about the dead children from Newtown and how an assault weapons ban is needed (handguns were actually involved), the same liberals are NOT crying out for banning surgical equipment used to abort children’s lives. Arguably, more children are murdered with abortion-associated surgical supplies than guns, but why would we let facts distort the liberal agenda, once they get on a roll? Both means have killed kids, so where’s the liberal outrage on abortion deaths? NEWS FLASH: Feigned liberal outrage rules the day. The anti-gun nut jobs are disingenuous and worthy of Darwin Award Winner front runner recognition…these buffoons serve as walking comedy props and are breathing proof that “you can’t fix stupid”. Sorry for the digression, so the analogy continues…the handguns of Newtown and the sugical instruments should be correctly labeled for what they are…inantimate objects incapable of inflicting harm without human intervention. Neither wish to debate the definition of human or be bored with a concocted story of a Maine Coon cat knocking a loaded gun off of a counter thereby killing a child…OMG…much too purrfect. My contention is that ignorant and/or defective people cause the problems based upon their actions, inactions, or garden-variety stupidity. HINT: If the liberals want to ban guns, then where is their “cry” for a similar ban on surgical equipment used in abortions? Fact Check: There is plenty of evidence that guns and surgical supplies both have killed children. So if the liberals want to sue gun manufacturers, then why not apply that line of liberal logic to the surgical supply manufacturer? Again, there is usually a defective human involved in the decision to shoot someone or to abort a child. Bottom line: You don’t have to be smart to breed, drive, or vote and the proof is all around us. I submit the current situation as proof of my hypothesis. It’s time to rally to the truth and drive out the wicked and clueless from this blessed (currently cursed) land. The truth is our Constitution and the sequel is our 2d Amendment. All of the businesses and citizens supporting this initiative are the “Standard Bearers of the 2d Amendment”. Stand united and be prepared to protect our freedom. The threat is clearly identified and if you’re not a “Standard Bearer” you are the problem. Get off of the fence you Big Dogs out there and “Let’s Roll” to victory over stupidity and elitism.
Comment by Michael Kreck — March 2, 2013 @ 6:08 pm
Bravo Zulu to CTD and the many other firearms and accessories manufacturers who have taken a strong stand against more restrictive laws. Feel good laws which do nothing to reduce crime but certainly infringe upon the rights of law abiding citizens. Will the liberal left ever come to the realization as stats have shown, it’s not the tool but the deranged holder of the tool which is the problem. That being said, they should focus their concerns on the real problem and not continue their fight to infringe on the rights of the law abiding citizens of this great nation. Should any of the businesses feel a need to relocate, I’m sure they would receive a warm welcome in South Carolina. Again, thanks for taking a strong stand on this issue.
Comment by Mel Benton — March 2, 2013 @ 6:19 pm
I support the companies that refuse to do business with LE/Govt agencies in states that restrict sales to the individuals, but isn’t this pep-rally of an article a little hypocritical of CTD??? The good folks of this country are being squeezed every which way regarding firearms and ammo, and CTD is also gouging the customers just to make a buck in the wake of the Newtown tragedy. They’re just as bad as the politicians in my eyes. Have you seen the PMAG prices on here lately?! $89 for a PMAG is ridiculous. $399 for box of 300 rounds of loose 5.56 ammo is also ridiculous. Don’t give the me Econ101 lesson of supply and demand, I understand it well. If a hurricane hits and gas stations jack up their price of gas 700% you better believe the state’s atty general would be filing a suit for price gouging. Same principle here CTD, remove the log from your own eye before you try to remove the speck from another’s eye.
Comment by Eric — March 2, 2013 @ 6:26 pm
I sure do support those companies, since ruger started their petition I am purchasing a ruger rifle. I will be more likely to order from companies denying government sales than to purchase from a company that treats the police better than We the People. I hope we see Glock S&w Beretta Mossberg Remington also jump on this bandwagon.
Comment by Jerry — March 2, 2013 @ 6:34 pm
“FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS”
I salute these mfg”s that support this “frame of mind”. They respect & would die for the same FLAG that I fly in my frontyard. “SEMPER PHI”
As our founding fathers predicted the “GOVERNMENT” must be contained. We the AMERICAN people have allowed our gvt. to get WAY OUT OF CONTROL. We must insist that there be TERM LIMITS for all of our representatives.
“All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree.”
C. James Madison 1793
“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.
C. Plato 333 B.C.
God bless us all.
Comment by James Cameron Paul Lawson — March 2, 2013 @ 7:03 pm
I feel that the manufacturers should not only stop providing to state law enforcement but to federal as well. Let it be know that I do have full respect for our men and women in uniform and wouldn’t want them harmed or placed in a situation without protection. IT IS well past time that WE THE PEOPLE stand up to those in d.c. who are attempting to abolish the law of the land – the CONSTITUTION -by undermining OUR RIGHTS that have been established by GOD and our forefathers who fought for those rights. The people who are damaging our rights haven’t got a clue what they are talking about. Diane Feinstein has no clue what she is talking about when it comes to weapons – go take a class and learn and leave law abiding citizens alone. I dont understand sewing and don’t go around saying “hey lady that is some dangerous looking sewing machine you got there. they should be banned!.”
stop playing theatrics with the prez and get to work finding a way to support OUR country and let the jehadists and wack jobs have their country and ideas. Cut their handouts of billions of dollars and have them hate U.S. for free.
GOD BLESS AMERICA.
Comment by bill evans — March 2, 2013 @ 7:32 pm
If civilians cant buy guns high capacity mags and ect then law enforcement or any kind of government funded branch except military should not be allowed to by them or get them this goes for optics ammo of any kind. We the people need to stand up now and not just sit back and watch tv or set around about this I would gladly give up a week of work or anything in my life that I do everyday and go with others like me and protest against this gun control. First they will disarm you they take all you have or slowly they will make it harder and harder for you to get, buy or receive any kinda food or dayly needs so you will give up your guns think about it you your family not haveing any food for a week because they want you to give up your guns and ammo and you cant eat the bullets so you will give up your 2 ammendment so you can have food. What im saying is all they gotta do is take away our food and make us go hungry till we give up the guns then we will all get on a bus to this (fema) camps every ones been talking about in all the major cities in the u.s and will house us there till we die. Sit back and think about that think about any way they could do that when you figure it out you will see its not hard so we the ppl need to get off our butts and stand together and rise against this and not stop till we win 1776 will happn all over again but it will be us against the government is how its looking its our god given right to have freedom of anything no one man or anyone cant take from any one person the right to have or do anything. Give me liberty or give me death
Comment by josh johnson — March 2, 2013 @ 7:57 pm
Awesome! We need more companies to get on board with this now. Sig, Glock, S&W, Ruger, etc… Manufactures, dealers, business owners’s & ceo’s of not only firearms, but ammo & accessories as well. Any and everyone in the industry who gives a damn need to stand together and shut this ridiculous spectacle of a debate down for good.
Comment by mike — March 2, 2013 @ 8:12 pm
Bravo to the afore mentioned companies. Bring your businesses to Arizona. Most of my children live in California, and due to its difficult licensing regulations, they have to illegally carry a weapon with ammunition in it.
Comment by gene — March 2, 2013 @ 8:44 pm
There is a listing over at http://www.thepoliceloophole.com/ . Might want to compare notes with them and perhaps merge the lists.
Lexington, NC has plenty of vacant manufacturing space, electricity and water. It has very good access to highway transportation and a regional airport. The city services are on a par with the best and the police department seems to be in favor of supporting the Constitution.
At this point in time there seem to be enough companies on board with this that there is exactly NO reason to do business with anyone else.
Comment by LexingtonNC — March 2, 2013 @ 9:09 pm
The death toll for over a decade of school shootings cannot equal the death toll of a single day of abortions.
The annual death toll for gun deaths is roughly the death toll from 10 days of abortions.
Liberals like abortions … fetuses can’t shoot back.
I can.
Comment by LexingtonNC — March 2, 2013 @ 9:15 pm
Yes, I support any business who let’s the Government know THEY WORK FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS NATION and not the other way around and as a private business, that business HAS THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE TO ANYONE, INCLUDING GOVERNMENT ENTITIES AND THEIR EMPLOYEES. As for New York and California, those rich elite types such as Bloomberg and Feinstein need to be voted out of office! They too, forget they are CIVIL SERVANTS in a position of trust to serve WE THE PEOPLE and not their own self-serving personal agenda. Why we are at it, Mr. Obama looks ridiculous trying to hold a shotgun, as if he know which end of the barrel the projectile even comes from??? And everytime Mr. Biden opens his mouth, it is either profanity or ignorance. It boggles the mind that people lacking common sense were ever elected to a public office.
Comment by RPK — March 2, 2013 @ 9:30 pm
I completely agree with refusing to sale to law enforcement in states that are violating the rights of their citizens. I will support any company who chooses to do this with all my future purchases.
Comment by Jeremiah Bucher — March 2, 2013 @ 10:21 pm
Any of these companies that under communistic attack promoted by obama and these idiot liberials we would welcome them to move to Tennessee. We still have sanity here.
Comment by Timber Wolf — March 2, 2013 @ 10:51 pm
It’s time for the manufacturers to fight back! Yes they will lose large quantity orders that LE agencies make but there enough of us out here that will support their actions by buying weapons and gear from those who fight for our right to bear arms. Add Maryland to the dumb ass law list. Baretta faught back and seems like they got a provision to continue to do buisness in the state but thats not enough. They need to pull out of MD and show those SOB’s how it feels to lose 200+ jobs, tax revenue and a future plant expansion and shut down the gov contract they have.
Comment by LB — March 2, 2013 @ 11:12 pm
The reaction of the American firearms industry to the federal and state governments recent intrusions on the Second Amendment is not only admirable, it is a shining example of the power and beauty of our free enterprise system.
Through the proper application of their power as manufacturers and suppliers of firearms to both the citizenry and the government, these companies have collectively demonstrated to tyrannical governments that they will not participate in efforts to strip the people of the United States of their rights. I applaud this effort and vow to respond in kind.
I will stand by, support and do business with ONLY those manufacturers who have chosen to stand with and support American citizens by REFUSING to do business with governments who have attempted to proclaim themselves as “superior” to their citizens. Not only will I stand by my promise to limit my business to these companies alone, but I vow to share this sentiment with everyone I know and encourage them to do the same.
As an instructor of hunting skills and a hunting dog trainer, my opinion impacts a good many people. I am happy to say that already, several “die hard” supporters of certain firearms companies have been encouraged to take their business elsewhere, based on how those companies have chosen to react to recent legislation.
Let it be known that WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT BACK UP, BACK DOWN OR LAY DOWN!!!
Comment by Dee — March 2, 2013 @ 11:31 pm
Wow….I thought I was all alone out here in the cold world. Yes, I 100% support these companies for taking this stance and will support them with my wallet. The 2nd Amendment is that last freedom we have…our government has suspeded all other freedoms as they now can do warrantless searches, hold you without charge, and drone attack you without due process.
I will admit however as I’ve aged I have mellowed on my stance on my guns as when I was a younger man the only way they could take my gun was from my cold dead hands but, as I said I have mellowed they now can take my guns from my WARM dead hands!
When the lead starts flying as it will help your neighbor to defends his life and property!!!!
Comment by Jeffrey Blose — March 2, 2013 @ 11:49 pm
I’m sure that any Company that has problems with States that unfriendly I’m sure will find a welcome home here in Texas.
I’m very proud of the companies that have taken the stances that they have. They make me proud to be an American!
Comment by Joe B. — March 3, 2013 @ 12:32 am
I as A very patriotic citizen I aplaud these companies that are taking a stand to
insure our 2nd amement rights. I would be very happy to any of these co. to move to
my state of WV.the Goverment has been attacking our constitution for to long now
in our countries history many brave men & woman have served this country and many of our
soldiers have given thier lives to protect our freedoms.I for one believe the Gov.
wants to disarm everybody for the simple fact that the citizens of our great Country
would be easier to control when the polititons incompatance throws our country into
such an unstable situation that the people might just say “I’ve had enough”and possibly totaly ignore the morons in gov. And think back when we were under British rule. And we all know how that turned out.Sorry “big brother” you cant control the citizens after all your efforts have failed and trying to dis arm us wont work.
So I strongly sugest every law maker in the country better start putting more thought
into what there trying to do. Or do all polititions lack commen sense ?
Comment by Robert Saunders — March 3, 2013 @ 1:43 am
I completely and fully support these firearms companies in their refusal to support, service, or sell their firearms, magazines, and firearm accessories to Federal, State, and Local governments that support or enforce the proposed bans on specific firearms and high capacity magazines. In fact, as a U.S. citizen, and even in this difficult economy, I fully intend to and WILL relocate from my current state to one more favorable to the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens “Right to Bear Arms” should my current State support this nonsense. I am an FAA licensed aircraft mechanic and USN Aviation Ordinance Veteran and have mechanical skills useful to the firearms industries interested in relocating due to “unfavorable business climates”. I wholeheartedly support their rights to sell to citizens under the second amendment.
Comment by Kevin Drye USN Veteran — March 3, 2013 @ 4:59 am
As a Veteran, I completely and fully support these firearms companies in their refusal to support, service, or sell their firearms, magazines, and firearm accessories to Federal, State, and Local governments that support or enforce the proposed bans on specific firearms and high capacity magazines. In fact, as a U.S. citizen, and even in this difficult economy, I fully intend to and WILL relocate from my current state to one more favorable to the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens “Right to Bear Arms” should my current State support this nonsense. I am an FAA licensed aircraft mechanic and USN Aviation Ordinance Veteran and have mechanical skills useful to the firearms industries interested in relocating due to “unfavorable business climates”. I wholeheartedly support their rights to sell to citizens under the second amendment.
Comment by Kevin Drye USN Veteran — March 3, 2013 @ 5:01 am
This is absolutely awesome news! and I’am very proud to say that I stand behind these companies and their decisions 200 percent!! and from here on out,I will only buy from these companies and any and all other companies that follow suit.Its about time that legislators in states such as New York and California and any other states that have passed or are even thinking about passing such unacceptable and tyranical gun laws against my fellow american citizens in those states be given a wake up call,and shown that their law enforcement agencies won’t be able to just get weapons and ammunition to repress the citizens anytime they want! Furthermore these legislators need to be shown that their law enforcement will not always be able to aquire weapons that are superior to what civilians can own. Finally in closing I would also like to encourage any and all firearms and ammunition manufactures in this country(or abroad)who do business with the federal government to please stop selling to ALL federal law enforcement agencies immediately! Please everyone! take a stand now! I fear this may be our last hope of stopping Barack Obama and his communist administration as well as the criminals in congress and the supreme court from establishing a dictatorship! To all the people living in New York,California and other states with similar gun laws my prayers are with you! GOD BLESS THE U.S.A.!!!!!!
Comment by Austin Robert Todd — March 3, 2013 @ 6:39 am
I fully support the decisions of these companies, and support them whole heartedly. We must all stand together as one voice!
Comment by Mike Rhone — March 3, 2013 @ 8:16 am
I applaud the manufacturers for making the stand against 2nd rate citizenship mentality the elected few seem to have. Why don’t they drop their protection we afford them & see what it’s like for once. Making the legit gun owners feel like criminals is akin to making good parents out to be child abusers w/o justification.
We are not children that have to be lead & told what & how to do things all the time, rules & guide lines are there for us. Whether we choose to follow them is where the problem lies, not banning & outlawing everything. Criminals will never follow the law, law abiders will become more vulnerable w/o the freedom & right to protect themselves.
There’s lot of posturing & speeches to make a point about guns & rights there of but you will never legislate morality & responsibility, that you have or you don’t.
Comment by Carlos — March 3, 2013 @ 8:18 am
hopefully all companies adopt this stance
Comment by jon — March 3, 2013 @ 9:42 am
God bless the companies that are fighting back against the criminal state and federal legislators. They are true patriots I support them and will send a check to help fund a move to a gun friendly state if they do move. I will also write to my state gov. in Florida and ask that those companies get a tax break and or incentives.
I would also like to say that ALL gun and ammo sales to LE in anti gun states should be stopped!as well as sales to the criminal feds. Boycotts of goods or lottery tickets from the anti gun states will also put pressure on these Marxist state governments.
Moves like this will give the silent majority in these states incentive to vote the anti gun people out of office.
I can’t say much more than has already been said by others. I have seen or constitutional rights slowly being taken away piece by piece over the years while the people slept and were wrapped up in their day to day lives until now we are in a crisis. The feds are in our homes eating our food and telling us what to eat how to dress. and mandating how we should raise our children, the list if you think about it goes on and on. I guess the 2nd amendment is where we make our stand but the whole constitution has been violated by the government for many years now.
Lets take our country back, protect the whole constitution. It is the only thing between us and tyranny and eventual slavery.
CTD i was concerned about you, for a while it looked like you might fold to the anti-gun pressure, welcome back.
Jim
Comment by jim — March 3, 2013 @ 10:00 am
I agree with the manufactures standing up against big brother, who is hell bent on destroying the rights and financial lives of many Americans in an effort to impose their narrow minded thinking. I will continue to buy supplies and firearms from USA mfg’s when I can. All government agencies are not above the rest of us and should live by the same rules as the general public. My concern is the government will lift it’s import ban for LE only and will start importing all their equipment from foreign companies. I am sure those companies would be more than happy to supply our government with cheap, more expensive, defective equipment……..
Comment by Timothy Lucas — March 3, 2013 @ 10:08 am
I think we should take this a step further and CTD and all other firearm dealers stop selling S&W, Glock, Sig, or any other mfgs products unless they support this movement.
I own two S&Ws and a Sig and if they don’t jump onboard I will never buy another one.
Just my two cents…
Comment by Drew Windham — March 3, 2013 @ 10:14 am
The government of the State of New York has told the citizenry they have two choices: obey state law or obey constitutional law. The government of the state of New York has formally rejected the U. S. Constitution’s guarantee of rights – known as the “Bill of Right” – the first ten Amendments to the Constition. These Amendments predominantly provide for restricting the infringement of God given rights.
Let us focus on my personal interpretation of a tiny part of New Yorks new “law”. “When confronted with a deadly threat you must relinquish tactical advantage to your attacker’. I plan to visit New York later this year. I will be leaving my opinion on the steps of the capital. The Urine will dry, but the other part will remain longer so as to help moderate the stench of these foul treasonous jackals who call themselves representatives of the people.
Comment by Sheldon Padawer — March 3, 2013 @ 11:00 am
Thank You, Thank You, Thank You, for standing up for us and with us. Remember “United we stand, Divided we fall”
Comment by Luis Gonzalez — March 3, 2013 @ 3:24 pm
I commend LaRue for their products, and their leadership and moral courage. I will only patronize those companies which take a similar stand. My state of PA has so far been more supportive of responsible gun ownership than many states, I hope this continues, and that companies forced out of other NE states might consider making PA their home.
Comment by Corey — March 3, 2013 @ 5:49 pm
Where are the big players in this? It would go a long way if Glock, Sig, S&W, Colt, etc. would stand up and make this same commitment. It is time to stand together to stop this tyranny.
Comment by Deanocraft — March 3, 2013 @ 7:09 pm
As a police officer, I highly support relocation of companies and them denying sales to governmentworkers. This needs to be done by all companies.
Comment by Jason — March 3, 2013 @ 7:22 pm
I am a CA. resident. I have been to firearms stores where high capacity magazines are sold to LE officers only. Magazines with no LE use. 30 round mags for a Ruger 10-22 or an 30 round AK type mag. They need these why? If they leave their depts they just keep them? They are no more law abiding than I am. The Glock Gen 4, LE only in CA. Why? A magazine safety? I commend these corporations for standing up for the citizens of our country. Thank you.
Comment by Don Cook — March 3, 2013 @ 11:32 pm
As an USMC veteran and a current Federal Officer I wholeheartedly support and applaud all of these companies and organizations. I have spent my entire adult life in support of our constitution and protecting the American people. I have fought for their right to feel, believe and behave differently, with values that I do not share. If you make ANYONE, myself included, “more equal” than others when it comes to freedom and Constitutional protection, that all becomes wasted effort. I am not alone in the Law Enforcement and Veteran communities, but we all need to be strong and stand firm together on our principles or they will tear us down one little brick at a time. We all need to support these companies for their integrity and fortitude. Let them know, pat them on the back and encourage them. God bless them and us all as it is going to be a hard fight I think… It seems that the inmates are running the asylum.
Comment by HK (dwilly) — March 4, 2013 @ 9:03 am
for Don Cook: if I were you my friend I would have gotten away from The Socialist Republic of Calf. a LONG time ago.
Y’all are welcome to come to Texas we can buy whatever we want here.
Comment by Joe B. — March 4, 2013 @ 10:29 am
I am very impressed with these companies and that they are taking this stand. I know this could cause them a great deal of finacial hardship but, this shows that they care more about principals than money. If a company has to leave my State (Calif)I would still support them it is not their fault it is the states fault for having such intrusive gun laws.
Comment by Scott Hansen — March 4, 2013 @ 11:04 am
I applaud ANYONE who is willing to protect their Rights under the US Constitution! The same goes for those willing to walk the walk and (unlike politicians)not merely talk the talk. I will DEFINITELY continue to support any company that leaves an oppressive regime and moves to a freedom loving and nurturing State. I would LOVE any and ALL companies seeking the freedom to produce and sell firearms and accessories in a new, friendlier, environment to consider strongly Oklahoma. We have an excellent attitude, combined with a hard-working, educated and skilled workforce. This State has several military bases, premium colleges, several Federal education hubs (USPS and FAA), is part of this Country’s Aviation Triangle and is heavily involved in the automotive industry. We have the skills, the ethics and the inclination to be a welcoming environment for new businesses within the firearms industry. Did I mention being at the crossroads of America as well as access to America’s major waterways? Y’all come to this good State and ask Gov. Fallin for a hand-shake and howdy meeting and you will see for yourself that what I am saying is true. Hope to see your doors opening on a new and bright future in Oklahoma! I am a Yankee by birth, Okie by choice. I am retired military (only we weren’t allowed to have firearms…) and have been in Federal employ. One way or another, I have been a servant of my fellow Americans, with few and short periods to the contrary, my whole adult life. I, too, have sworn an oath to “protect and defend” and when I was out-processing from military duty I was never ONCE released from that promise, nor would I ever choose to be. I am a Patriot, and a Sheepdog. I wish to make a clear point in the face of all these arguments about firearms: it is an American’s RIGHT to own firearms. PERIOD. These questions of “what is needed, or what type we can have is utterly beside the point. Just as a 400 horsepower SUV is not necessary to get your kids to school, it is your American RIGHT to own such a vehicle if only because you WANT IT!! NO firearm, nor accessory, should be banned, limited or forbidden from ownership by an American UNLESS that person has PROVEN themselves to be dangerous to others while possessing one. Even fully automatic weapons are not a threat to others when in the hands of law-abiding citizens! They may, in fact, be of benefit to over-stretched, beleaguered law enforcement (read: Katrina). In such a case, the law abiding would NOT take the law into their own hands, but would work closely with, and subordinate to, law enforcement (can you say MALITIA???. Therefore, I support the principles of companies who elect to withhold sales to LE of States who prevent sales to civilians, as well as support any who relocate their production to another State to further their protests. THAT, friends, is what makes America GREAT!
Comment by Roger Fanjette — March 4, 2013 @ 11:06 am
I live in southern california and I support the actions made to include le/govt. agencies to have to fallow the same restirctions they would impose on the citizens who pay there paychecks. I would hope more firearms companies would do the same and extend this police to all states instead of just focusing on Ny; whoem I am told are allready not exempt from there awb(I could be wrong on that). I would have liked to have seen the same effert taken years aggo for my state to help humbel our leos and make them remember that they are not king and lords in charge of us lowly serfs and pesants but employes intrested to protect us even from themselves if needs be. I would happaly give up all my firearms if you can garantee that not a singel person on the face of this earth will ever be courupted or do an unkind thing ever again. As long as people are capable of evil deeds then I will keep any tool at my disposal to aid me in protecting myself from those people whoeve they may be.
Comment by Rumbum — March 4, 2013 @ 11:20 am
It is past time that “We the People” show that we can react in more ways then voting. Please help the firearm’s company by doing the same that they are talking about doing.
When a business or manufacture bows to this anti gun institutions without applying the same restrictions on all law-enforcement and military, boycott those businesses and manufacturing industries.
Believe it or not there are those that will bow to the anti-gunners so that the business can remain profitable. But everyone needs to know that “We the People” are standing our ground and there is no more cooperation from us anymore. Every time we allow them to apply their way, the next thing is another restriction. Say no more restrictions.
Also the ammunitions manufacture’s need to stop allowing the government to buy up all munitions manufactured to cause empty shelves and higher prices to citizens. If it isn’t military ammo don’t sell it to them.
Comment by Harold Newell GySgt USMC retired — March 4, 2013 @ 12:37 pm
I have been a NRA member for 20 yrs., 10 of them a life member. I support these companies and i am glad they are fighting back! I live in Michigan, i know this state would be glad to have them, and i would gladly work for any of them !
Comment by Rick — March 4, 2013 @ 3:12 pm
I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THE REASON FOR THE 2ND AMENDMENT TO OUR CONSTITUTION.THE ENTIRE REASON WE THE CITIZENS OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY ARE ALLOWED TO OWN FIREARMS IS TO REMAIN A FREE COUNTRY. OUR FORE FATHERS KNEW NEVER TO TRUST YOUR GOVERNMENT.AS LONG AS WE HAVE FIREARMS, IT KEEPS OUR GOVERNMENT IN CHECK.PEACE.
Comment by STAN KOSTECKI — March 4, 2013 @ 4:11 pm
I would be pleased if firearms related manufacturers and distributors, located in firearm restrictive states, relocated to Texas. We have a good business climate and a very nice quality of life.
Comment by Ralph Gruebel — March 4, 2013 @ 5:26 pm
I live in Houlton Maine. We already have a S&W plant here. I think the Springfieild,Mass. operations should move the whole plant to Maine,however,the Southern part of Maine is just a Northern extention of Boston,Cambridge,Newton, bunch or anti gunnies,Liberals.They give Northern Aroostook County a bad rap,but there are a lot of gun owners here.The Northern Mass. residents that call Portland Maine their home have the same ideoligies as the Massasoits. C’mon up to northern maine.DeWayne Brink
Comment by DeWayne Brink — March 4, 2013 @ 6:11 pm
I will support any company, that stands against local and federal agency’s, that think they are better than the people they serve. I have bought items from several of these company’s even thought I don’t need them right now. As long as I have money ,I will continue to support brave company’s,and people, that stand for what is right. Furthermore Alabama has many county’s that are,(and always have been) friendly to gun ownership and the gun industry. Most county’s in Alabama would bend over backwards to have these manufactures come to their county. Who wouldn’t want more jobs ,except a brain dead morons . (NY Chicago and many more) Some states aren’t even America anymore.
Comment by Dan Mitchell — March 4, 2013 @ 6:52 pm
I applaud the companies not selling to LE agencies in states that do not support private gun ownership. I live in Texas where there is strong support for gun ownership. I would be proud to have manufacturers move to Texas if they are operating in states that don’t support their business. I also support the companies that are taking a stand.
In my opinion, I don’t think this was or is an action that these states throught about or have plans to deal with. These companies should also be putting pressure on the federal government. The US governement has to purchase it’s equipment from a manufacturer as well. Imagine the military branch getting behind the US citizens to block Feinstein and her crew?! That would be a huge win for us. I know that it would be a significant loss to the companies that have federal contracts, but we are not just fighting for our 2nd ammendment rights, we are fighting for all our rights. If we let them taken one of our Constitutional rights, what will we do they start to take away the next one?
Comment by Eric Christie — March 5, 2013 @ 11:32 am
I too applaud the various manufacturers who are proudly refusing to do business with states’ agencies where restictive gun laws have been passed.
I have also decided to boycott in another small way. When I am browsing the news on Google ( or other general websites ) I am careful to avoid publications from New York, Chicago, Bloomberg, Washington Post etc. etc. Probably my commerce or lack thereof won’t be felt, but if we all are careful we can hit them in their wallets.
Comment by William Mitchel — March 5, 2013 @ 5:25 pm
This is great what SOME of these companies are doing to support our 2nd Amendment rights and stand next to us regular folks. I fully support those companies and have bought from several of them, but I haven’t seen the news that breaks my heart. Armalite and Magpul both have said they will continue to sell to LE/Gov. I have a ton of Magpul product and not sure what to think now. I see their point of wanting to help the cops that help us…..but when it comes down to it when the gov. says go take the guns from us reg. citizens or your job is gone, well, I don’t want to find out how many LE are talking crap about standing with us and the 2nd.! Sounds like it is all about the bottom dollar for Magpul. And Magpul said they couldn’t help with the pricing from their distributors……I beg to differ. Cut them the hell off from gouging us and sell them your self from your site. Sorry all, needed to rant, but to the rest of those companies out there standing strong….I thank you. Also, sorry I can’t remember the article about Magpul and Armalite to reference and link. If I find it again I will post it. It may be on their sites.
Comment by Dave S. — March 5, 2013 @ 6:02 pm
I have bought a lot of products from both Magpul and Armalite, and I am here to state that I will no longer patronize either of these company’s or any others that deny the support our rights to arm ourselves in accordance with the 2nd Amendment. If they can respect the rights of “We the People” to defend our families and our property as designed by the Constitution, I will continue to with hold buying any products that they sell or indorse.
Comment by Harold Newell GySgt USMC retired — March 6, 2013 @ 9:44 am
Think about it for just a second. High profile killings were all done without what is being called ”ASSULT WEAPONS”. Lincoln was shot with a single shot black powder pistol, Kennedy was assassinated with a five shot bolt action rifle, MLK was shot with a five shot hunting rifle, Oklahoma bombing was done without the use of a single gun, Twin Towers was committed without a single gun, Japan’s deadly subway killings was done without even one gun, and the list goes on. Admit it! Politician’s want to get rid of all weapons that threaten them and keep them from doing what they really want to do.
The real reason
Most people mistakenly think that the 2nd Amendment was added to the Constitution so that “We the People” could defend their person and property. This is not true. The 2nd Amendment was written and added to the document by Alexander Hamilton so that the people could guard the public from the dangers of a government gone astray or a tyrannical government coming to power, or if our military decided to overthrow the government to make a Dictatorship.
“This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future.” (Adolf Hitler 1935)
“The attention of the government ought particularly to be directed to the formation of a select corps of moderate size, upon such principles as will really fit it for service in case of need,” “By thus circumscribing the plan, it will be possible to have an excellent body of well-trained militia ready to take the field whenever the defense of the State shall require it.” “This will not only lessen the call for military establishments, but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens.” “This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist.” (Alexander Hamilton 1774)
Comment by Harold Newell GySgt USMC retired — March 6, 2013 @ 9:48 am
I fully support any company willing to put the power back in the hands of the people.
Comment by Danny Peterson — March 6, 2013 @ 8:30 pm
I absolutely support all efforts by all parties involved and will make it a point to do business with these companies whenever possible. I just wish the major firearms manufacturers and distributors would get on board. It is my firm belief that there are many more people in the US who support the 2nd amendment as written than those who do not. I do not believe the mainstream media and their biased poll results. If firearms owners / enthusiasts do not take a stand NOW we will lose the 2nd amendment altogether piece by piece. Pay attention to history.
Comment by jeff godowski — March 6, 2013 @ 10:49 pm
I think that what all this companies are doing,is very brave and is the right thing to do. I Tip my hat to all. I also think that all the ammunition makers should stop selling and supplying ammo to all federal, state, and city governments in anti-gun and anti-2nd amendment states like New York.Cut them off.There are plenty of friendly states and you can always make the difference.Keep up the good work.
Comment by Arthur Fernandez — March 7, 2013 @ 7:49 pm
There were a few ol’ boys back a couple hundred years ago that saw this comming and wrote some documents to prevent this from happening. They believed every man should be free from a government controlling their every move. They got fed up and decided to stand and fight! Now I am ready to fight for the same things. The second ammendment is not just about your right to protect yourself from criminals, its also about protecting yourself from from a government that wants to control you! First its high capacity magazines, then its rifles they make sound evil by sticking “assault” in front of it then its all guns no matter what type or caliber! I agree completely with what these companies are doing! I hope they dont have to move but if they do please come to the upstate of south carolina! I would love to come work for you! GO GET EM’ SENATOR GRAHAM!!! If they strip Americans of their guns what will keep our enemies from just invading? They dont invade now because they know we have more guns than they do!!!! Wake up America before its too late!
Comment by Cameron R. — March 8, 2013 @ 2:42 pm
“it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran” (then make it clear before you pass it Diane-DB)
Thirty yrs ago my exfather in law,WW2 vet wounded multiple times, refused the free Purple Heart licince plate for his car. He told me it never pays to draw unneeded attention to yourself. It is advice to heed today too.
In Maryland they want to put a “W” in the restrictions area of the Drivers License to ID the person as a VET. A W on your DL will end your right to own a weapon in the USSA in the future.
Feinstein: Veterans May Have PTSD And Should Not Be Exempt From Assault Weapons Ban
At a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting on Thursday, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California) opposed an amendment to her Assault Weapons Ban legislation that would allow military veterans to continue to buy the firearms that would be banned. Feinstein says a veteran may be mentally ill and should be prevented from purchasing firearms.
SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN: If I understand this, this adds an exemption of retired military. As I understand our bill, no issue has arose in this regard during the 10 years the expired ban was in effect and what we did in the other bill was exempt possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States. So that included active military.
The problem with expanding this is that, you know, with the advent of PTSD, which I think is a new phenomenon as a product of the Iraq War,it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran, and that there was no impairment of that individual with respect to having a weapon like this.
So, you know, I would be happy to sit down with you again and see if we could work something out but I think we have to– if you’re going to do this, find a way that veterans who are incapacitated for one reason or another mentally don’t have access to this kind of weapon.
Comment by DB Cooper — March 9, 2013 @ 6:46 am
in every other of the first ten amendments to our noble founding document “the people” means the people. why should the second article in the bill of rights be treated any differently? those who allege intentional ambiguity specific to the second amendment as some sort of pulse of a living document do a disservice to our founding fathers. certainly the constitution is, and must be, a living document- witness abolition. certainly also, the “god given” rights espoused in the bill of rights must be recognized as the rights of all of humanity regardless of race, color, creed, or place of residence. social contract and individual liberty do not have to be mutually exclusive, but when proponents of social contract seek the restriction of liberties acknowledged by our constitution, and then attempt to use that same document as some semantic weapon for their own purpose, individual liberty must be staunchly defended. the manufacturers and retailers who are refusing sales to le agencies in states with disproportionately restrictive firearms legislation are to be praised for their efforts in support of THE PEOPLE.
brian schuetz, the man at the helm of olympic arms, is to be lauded for his concise and articulate statement to this effect. i will go out of my way to do business with those who sacrifice law enforcement contract money to support the principle of individual freedom. i hope this sentiment resonates in the vast community of american (and all) gun owners.
Comment by mbrd — March 10, 2013 @ 10:37 am
Reply to mbrd (#843) — Very well said Sir!
I truly hope that all firearms manufacturers and associated companies move out of the sorry state of Colorado now that the legislature there has approved the most onerous of anti-gun laws. I will stop doing business with ANY company based in Colorado until they fight back and tell the liberal politicians of that state that banning firearms based on “how scary they look” is the most asinine thing going. They need to enforce the laws that are already on the books instead of making up new ones that mean absolutely NOTHING to the criminal element.
Comment by CC — March 10, 2013 @ 11:56 am
Finally the dollar bill is not as important as the Constitution. I applaud those companies that see fit not to send their products to those states that outlaw those products.
Obviously, we as U.S. citizens must help those companies that uphold the U.S. constitution by supporting them and keeping them in business. It now becomes our duty to help those who wish to do the correct thing. Why ? Because our Constitution is in jeopardy and is flagrantly being discussed by our politicians openly and audaciously.
We must not allow the U.S. to fall prey to the socialist that now run our country. I believe that we can win this war by voting out all politicians that are liberals and socialists.
To do this we must help all companies who support what the U.S. stands for. We are still the greatest Nation on this earth.
Comment by Joaquin Soares — March 10, 2013 @ 1:38 pm
I say the manufacturers of ammunition also restrict sales to LE/Govt in Chicago, NY, etc. See how naked they feel then. No ammo, no parts, no arms. Give them back their billy sticks and let them go on patrol. We’ll see how LE reacts then. Good on the arms manufacturers to punch back!
Comment by A — March 11, 2013 @ 10:18 am
I’m so glad that someone is on the side of gun owners,i don’t want to see anyone loose there jobs, but enough is enough. we must not allow the u.s.to fall prey to the socialist that run this country,( AMERICA )we must take a stand now.
Comment by david — March 12, 2013 @ 1:56 pm
As I already own an Olympic AR, looks like my next on will be Larue reguardless of how long the backorder time is. I fully support these companies and will limit all future purchases to these companies as my budget will allow.
Comment by Sandy — March 14, 2013 @ 3:08 pm
As a colorado native, in my wildest dreams did I ever see my state get so anti gun. I will support any manufacturer that leaves to a more friendly state and hope that state will keep the anti gunners out. I will vote against every anti gunner out there. What needs to happen in the state of colorado if you could get a few hundred thousand people to just show up and no firearms and just shut things down. Then they would have to use their FEMA camps we all hear about because they don’t have enough room in the jails.
Comment by weiss46 — March 16, 2013 @ 8:42 am
Hello all.
I live here in Sandy Hook and NO MATTER what your televisions are telling you, do not believe that we all want to ban guns. In fact the exact opposite is the reality here. There are a couple hundred well meaning and emotionally traumatized people who are very actively focusing all their angst on the gun and as such are being very exploited by the media. BUT there are thousands more in this town who fully understand the issue.
The task force meetings that have been taking place are largely pro-freedom, and out of every 100 speakers there may be 6-10 that are uninformed. We are being used and misrepresented – even our own “leaders” have called this their “opportunity”
I will say now, that all the backlash that is happening in this country…… COOL!! These things all need to happen. Time to draw the line and stand on the correct side.
I am actually quite hopeful seeing these things happen nationwide, don’t let these poor slaughtered people be used this way – Do Not Give Up!!!! Kathy
Comment by Kathy — March 16, 2013 @ 10:16 am
As an upstate NY resident I support all companies who stand up to the elitists in power who can arm themselves to the teeth with our tax money yet deny our Second Amendment Rights! All but one upstate county (outside of NYC) have now either proposed or passed legislation against the UN”safe” act. If the big gun companies would now join the ranks and break contracts that could turn the tide for good!
Comment by Dave — March 16, 2013 @ 10:55 am
AMMUNITION needs to be next on the not for sale list to government entities to really put the heat on. I can’t buy a box of 9mm anywhere to go & practice so why should government be able to contract all avail ammunition for them. I believe our government has nefarious intentions @ our expense & aimed @ us (shooting citizens)
Comment by Jerry McNeill — March 16, 2013 @ 2:36 pm
It is my honor to applaud all of the gun and gun related businesses and even those businesses that are not gun related that have taken a stand against the continued erosion of the rights that are in our constitution. I also applaud those local Sheriffs that have stated they will protect their citizens against laws that strip away the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens, by not enforcing said laws. I realize that these decisions will come with a price, either lost income or lost job at the next election. I pledge my support to this effort by supporting those companies with my dollar and my local Sheriff with my vote. It saddens me greatly to see the direction this great nation is going. I believe, if we stand together we can again stand tall.
Comment by Warren James — March 18, 2013 @ 9:53 pm
While not wishing for things to turn the way it has, I was hoping that the industry would see the hammer falling on all gun events and sells. It has been coming long before Obama but he has defiantly taken it to a whole new level. If this country was to abolish all guns in this country and make everyone one of them disappear over night, does anyone know what the outcome would be? Think about it for just one minute. What parts of our economy would not be touched? Virtually every thing in this country would be either destroyed or dramatically effected by it. It goes well beyond just guns. Think about it. Hunting industries would be out of business, clothing industries, steel manufactures, outfitters, recreational businesses, metal industries, gun powder manufactures, hotel and motel businesses, sporting good businesses, dinning and other traveler used business, cell phone companies, map makers, the fuel industry, hunting licenses in all states, taxes paid on all sporting goods equipment, and the list goes on and on. You would have to be totally insane to desire this to happen at this juncture of our financial times of this country. We all need to support everything associated with the demise of this gun grabbing crowd that we have in this country. As a life member of the NRA for over twenty years, a retired United States Marine, and a strong believer in the defense of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights I for will do all I can to promote people to boycott any business supporting anti-gunners, or fails to do all in their power to prevent these things from happening. Remember the famous quote of a person of historical value.
“This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future.” (Adolf Hitler 1935)
Comment by Harold Newell GySgt USMC retired — March 20, 2013 @ 1:18 pm
In short, yes. I have a great collection and don’t really need more guns. But each company that puts me the civilan on the same level as law enforcement I will buy more of their products and add to my collection to support them.
Comment by july4th — April 9, 2013 @ 11:02 am
Hope they all now add Maryland to the list of no sale to. Barretta is moving out of the state and taking its 400 jobs with it. Liberalism truely is a mental disorder.
Comment by DB Cooper — April 9, 2013 @ 3:07 pm
I support any company that FULLY supports the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution. Now we need to stop all ammo supplies to these so called Law Enforcement Agencies. Today I went to 4 different places to buy common .30-06 ammo with no success…WHERE is all the AMMO ? ? ?
Comment by Home of the Free NO LONGER — April 10, 2013 @ 1:39 pm
I would like to see ALL firearms manufactures leave the states that infringe on the 2nd Amendment. They are more than welcome here in Texas.
Comment by Joe B. — April 10, 2013 @ 3:23 pm
I will definitely support the companies that stand up to legislators who want to restrict any constitutional right that we as Americans enjoy. As a resident of Georgia, I would love to see any or all of the gun industry move to my state. Furthermore if I don’t start hearing about my state representatives trying to encourage the gun industry to move to Georgia, I will be voting for some else when the elections come around.
Comment by Jeremy Richardson — April 24, 2013 @ 2:49 pm